solve for x
4x+5(5x-39)=153

Answer:

144

Step-by-step explanation:

360/5 x 2  = 144

Answer:

119000

Step-by-step explanation:

The median is the middle value when placed from smallest to largest

95000, 112000, 126000, 13000

The middle is between 112000 and 126000 so take the average

(112000+126000)/2 =238000/2 =119000

Answer:

d = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

2d - 5d = -3d

10 - 4 = 6

-3d = 6  

d = -2

Kono Dio Da!!!

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 2d to both side of the equal sign. The 2ds cancel out and the 5d becomes a 3D.

Then subtract 10 to both sides to get -6.

The you divide -6 by 3. To get -2

Hope this helps

Please mark me as Brainliest

Answer:

5/30

Step-by-step explanation:

5/30 = 1/6 =0.166666666...

The fraction equals a repeating decimal is 5/30.

A decimal numeral system is the standard system for denoting integer and non-integer numbers. The way of denoting numbers in the decimal system is often referred to as decimal notation.

Now the given fractions are,

30/50

13/25

5/30

13/10

Converting them into decimals we get,

30/50 = 0.6

13/25 = 0.52

5/30 = 0.1666..

13/10 = 1.3

Thus the repeating decimal is 0.1666..

So, the fraction with repeating decimal is 5/30 = 0.1666..

Thus, the fraction equals a repeating decimal is 5/30.

To learn more about fraction :

brainly.com/question/1301963

#SPJ2

Answer:

Option D: 5591.93

Step-by-step explanation:

The best way to understand this question is to apply the formula in an indirect manner;

P - Principle number, Starting Value

T - Time

I - Interest

Let us convert the interest into decimal form, such that 3.8% is shifted two decimal points to the right ⇒ 0.038. Now add 1 to this value to get ⇒ 1.038. By PEDMAS, you would first raise this value to the span of 3 years as such:

(1.038)^3 = 1.118386872.......

The final step would by to multiply the starting value (investment $) $ 5,000 by this continuing value of 1.118386872:

5,000(1.118386872) = 5591.93436 ⇒ Rounded to (About) 5591.93

Answer:D

Step-by-step explanation:

principal=p=$5000

Rate=r=3.8%

Time=n=3 years

amount=a

a=p(1+r/100)^n

a=5000(1+3.8/100)^3

a=5000(1+0.038)^3

a=5000(1.038)^3

a=5000 x 1.038 x 1.038 x 1.038

a=5591.93

a=$5591.93

the answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

and I would love 20 points

Answer:

0.004

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of rolling any number is 1/6 so that times 3 is 1/216 that as a decimal i 0.004

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. The complete question is

The management of Discount Furniture, a chain of discount furniture stores in the Northeast, designed an incentive plan for salespeople. To evaluate this innovative plan, 12 salespeople were selected at random, and their weekly incomes before and after the plan were recorded.

Salesperson Before After

Sid Mahone $320 $340

Carol Quick 290 285

Tom Jackson 421 475

Andy Jones 510 510

Jean Sloan 210 210

Jack Walker 402 500

Peg Mancuso 625 631

Anita Loma 560 560

John Cuso 360 365

Carl Utz 431 431

A. S. Kushner 506 525

Fern Lawton 505 619

Solution:

Corresponding income of salespersons before and after form matched pairs.

The data for the test are the differences between the income is salespersons.

μd = the​ income before minus their income after.

Bedore after diff

320 340 -20

290 285 5

421 475 - 54

510 510 0

210 210 0

402 500 - 98

625 631 -6

569 560 0

360 365 - 5

431 431 0

506 525 - 19

505 619 - 114

Sample mean, xd

= (- 20 + 5 - 54 + 0 + 0 - 98 - 6 + 0 - 5 + 0 + - 19 - 114)/12 = - 25.92

xd = - 25.92

Standard deviation = √(summation(x - mean)²/n

n = 12

Summation(x - mean)² = (- 20 + 25.92)^2 + (5 - 25.92)^2 + (- 54 + 25.92)^2+ (0 + 25.92)^2 + (0 + 25.92)^2 + ( - 98 + 25.92)^2 + ( - 6 + 25.92)^2 + (0 + 25.92)^2 + (- 5 + 25.92)^2 + (0 + 25.92)^2 + (- 19 + 25.92)^2 + (- 114 + 25.92)^2 = 17784.5168

Standard deviation = √(17784.5168/12

sd = 38.5

For the null hypothesis

H0: μd ≥ 0

For the alternative hypothesis

H1: μd < 0

1) The distribution is a students t. Therefore, degree of freedom, df = n - 1 = 12 - 1 = 11

2) The formula for determining the test statistic is

t = (xd - μd)/(sd/√n)

t = ( - 25.92- 0)/(38.5/√12)

t = - 2.33

3) We would determine the probability value by using the t test calculator.

p = 0.02

4) Assume alpha = 0.05

Since alpha, 0.05 > than the p value, 0.02, then we would reject the null hypothesis. We can conclude that at 5% significance level, there is a significant increase in the typical salesperson’s weekly income due to the innovative incentive plan

Answer:150 branliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

150

Step-by-step explanation:

360/(5+7)=30

30*5=150

Answer:

Yes, customers that deal on cars

But no, if not car customers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Most customers of cars want lower interest rate because it gives them opportunity to work for a longer period and gradually make the profit and pay back.

Even if it will take time that was why the dealer made it longer time.

But this might not apply to customer to other services because they might have their own principles or government/policies or interest rate to their customers.

Answer:

It cost $0.91 10 years ago.

It takes 10.24 years for the cost of bread to double.

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for the price of bread after t years has the following format:

[tex]P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}[/tex]

In which P(0) is the current price, and r is the inflation rate, as a decimal.

If we want to find the price for example, 10 years ago, we find P(-10).

Inflation is at a rate of 7% per year. Evan's favorite bread now costs $1.79.

This means that [tex]r = 0.07, P(0) = 1.79[/tex]. So

[tex]P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}[/tex]

[tex]P(t) = 1.79(1+0.07)^{t}[/tex]

[tex]P(t) = 1.79(1.07)^{t}[/tex]

What did it cost 10 years ago?

[tex]P(-10) = 1.79(1.07)^{-10} = 0.91[/tex]

It cost $0.91 10 years ago.

How long before the cost of the bread doubles?

This is t for which P(t) = 2P(0) = 2*1.79. So

[tex]P(t) = 1.79(1.07)^{t}[/tex]

[tex]2*1.79 = 1.79(1.07)^{t}[/tex]

[tex](1.07)^{t} = 2[/tex]

[tex]\log{(1.07)^{t}} = \log{2}[/tex]

[tex]t\log{1.07} = \log{2}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{\log{2}}{\log{1.07}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 10.24[/tex]

It takes 10.24 years for the cost of bread to double.

Answer:

Denote B(x, y), we have:

-10 + x = 2 x (-16) => x = -22

  8 + y = 2 x 6 => y = 4

=> B(-22, 4)

Hope this helps!

:)

Answer:2c^2

Step-by-step explanation:

34c^3 and 2c^5

34c^3=2 x 16 x c x c^2

2c^5=2 x c^2 x c^3

Greatest common factor =2 x c^2

Greatest common factor =2c^2

Answer:

  0.6 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume is the cube of the edge length, so the edge length is the cube root of the volume.

  ∛(0.216 ft³) = 0.6 ft

The edge length is 0.6 ft.

Answer:

k=21

Step-by-step explanation:

x=7 X y=3 = 21

7 x 3 = 21

Answer:21

Step-by-step explanation:

xy=k

k=xy x=7 y=3

k=7 x 3

k=21

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The parallelogram in C has a base of 2 units and a height o 4 units.

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936[/tex]  

The p value can be founded with this formula:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-0.936)=0.175[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X_{1}=7.6[/tex] represent the mean for Gibbs products

[tex]\bar X_{2}=8.1[/tex] represent the mean for the competitor

[tex]\sigma_{1}=2.3[/tex] represent the population standard deviation for Gibbs

[tex]\sigma_{2}=2.9[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation for the competitor

[tex]n_{1}=40[/tex] sample size for the group Gibbs

[tex]n_{2}=55[/tex] sample size for the group competitor

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] Significance level provided

z would represent the statistic

Hypothesis to verify

We want to check if babies using the Gibbs brand gained less weight, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}< 0[/tex]  

The statistic would be given by:

[tex]z=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936[/tex]  

The p value can be founded with this formula:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-0.936)=0.175[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

distance between point x and z is 8 units

distance between point z and y is 4 units

8 * 4 = 32

formula for area of a triangle (l * w)/2

plugin: (8 * 4)/2 = 16

Answer:

X>-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope I helped

Do u want the steps ?

Answer: x > -3

Step-by-step explanation: -5(4x + 7) <25

                                              -20x - 35 < 25

                                              -20x -35 + 35 < 25 + 35

                                              -20x/20 < 60/20

                                              x > -3

Answer:

1. y=-2x+b

2. y=-2.5x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i think its 248m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a kite

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x=30\\y=68\\z=82[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

x = measure of the first angle

y = measure of the second angle

z = measure of the third angle

The sum of the measures of the second and third (y+z) is five times the measure of the first angle (=5x)

[tex]y+z=5x[/tex]

The third angle is 14 more than the second

[tex]z=y+14[/tex]

And remember that the sum of these three angles must be equal to 180.

[tex]x+y+z=180[/tex]

Let's take these equations

[tex]y+z=5x\\z=y+14\\x+y+z=180[/tex]

If you take a look at the first equation, we have y+z = 5x and we have y+z in the third equation as well, we can replace that....

[tex]x+y+z=180\\x+(y+z)=180\\x+(5x)=180[/tex]

Distribute the + sign

[tex]x+5x=180[/tex]

Combine like terms;

[tex]6x=180[/tex]

Divide by 6.

[tex]x=\frac{180}{6}\\ x=30[/tex]

We have now defined that the measure of the first angle is 30º.

Let's take another equation... for example [tex]z=y+14[/tex]

I'm going to take this one because if I replace x and z in the third equation, all I'll have left will be y.

[tex]x+y+z=180\\30+y+(y+14)=180[/tex]

Distribute the + sign and Combine like terms;

[tex]30+y+y+14=180\\44+2y=180\\[/tex]

Subtract 44 to isolate 2y.

[tex]2y=180-44\\2y=136[/tex]

Now divide by 2.

[tex]y=\frac{136}{2}\\ y=68[/tex]

We already have the value of x and y. Once again, replacing this in the third equation will leave us with z to solve for.

[tex]x+y+z=180\\30+68+z=180\\98+z=180\\z=180-98\\z=82[/tex]

Answer:

Define two roughly identical sets.

Reduce the chance of bias.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this experiment, Daniel performs a random assignment in order to stablish two separate groups with roughly equivalent ability to do barbell curls. Two different treatments (verbal encouragement and silence) are then applied in order to verify for a cause and effect relationship. If the groups were not randomly assigned, then the experiment could be biased.

Answer:

$0.39:1

Step-by-step explanation:

$0.39:1

Dividing the amount by the cost of the bottles.

Answer:

0.072

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:0.072

Step-by-step explanation:

7.2% = 7.2/100

7.2 ➗ 100=0.072

Answer:  C   (-2, 2), (1, -1), (3, 1). (2,4)

It will help to rotate the image so the x-axis is horizintal and the y-axis is vertical.

Step-by-step explanation:

Imagine the prefigure twirling on a parallel bar like a gymnast.

When it's up-side down the point that was at  (1,1) flips to (1. -1) and the point that was at  (3 -1) flips to (3, 1)

As you chech your choices, that knocks out most of the other possibilities.

But you should still verify the other cocorinates.

Hint: if the reflection is across the x-axis, the x values will be the same in the pre-image and the reflection, the y- values will change accorfing to their distance from the x-axis.

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

The total number of marbles

10+4+7 = 21

P(blue) = blue marbles / total marbles

            = 7 / 21

            = 1/3

Answer:

C.  [tex]\frac{\sqrt{5} }{8}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This expression can be rewritten as [tex]\frac{\sqrt{5} }{\sqrt{64} }[/tex].

Since the square root of 5 is prime and does not have any perfect square factors, it cannot be simplified. However, the square root of 64 is equal to 8, so our final simplified radical expression would be [tex]\frac{\sqrt{5} }{8}[/tex], which is option C.

HOPE THIS HELPED! :)

Answer:

C is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to rewrite as [tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex]/[tex]\sqrt{64}[/tex]. Then you have to simplify the denominator which is 8. That is how you get your answer.

Hope this helps.