False. The determination of whether a teenager who gets arrested can be considered and treated as an adult by the criminal justice system is not solely determined by constitutional authority at the federal level.
The age at which a juvenile can be charged as an adult, as well as the procedures and protocols surrounding the transfer of juvenile cases to adult court, are largely determined by state laws and regulations. While there are some federal laws and guidelines that influence how juveniles are treated in the criminal justice system, such as the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, the specifics of how these laws are implemented and enforced can vary widely from state to state.
To know more about criminal justice system, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ1
The permanent employment laws in many countries have resulted in differences between the Untied States and countries like France and Germany. Which of the following is an example of these differences?
a. The possibility of firing someone quickly without cause is a simple matter in Germany
b. It is a simple matter to fire an employee in France after a relatively short probationary period
c. German workers get an average of four time more severance pay than U.S. workers
d. In France, 45 hours is the legal weekly work limit for all employees
The differences between the United States and countries like France and Germany regarding permanent employment laws are: German workers get an average of four times more severance pay than U.S. workers.
Hence, option C is the correct answer. Labor laws across the world vary significantly, and it's fascinating to look at different countries' labor laws.
Europe is known for its more extensive labor protections, such as maximum workweeks and more significant vacation time. One of the most important areas of difference between US law and that of many European nations is labor law. In the US, it is relatively easy to hire and fire employees, while in Europe, there is a lot more job security in exchange for more challenging hiring procedures.
Permanent employment means that you are hired to work for a business, organization, or agency and will continue to work there as long as you like, provided that you follow the rules and do your job well. The only way your employment could come to an end is if you decide to quit or if the company has a valid reason to terminate you.
To know more about permanent employment laws refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14128742#
#SPJ11
T/F. In minority-dominated neighborhoods, residents are more likely to find it appropriate to call the police.
Residents are more likely to think it is proper to contact the police in areas where minority-dominated or predominate. True.
The percentage of whites (12%) and blacks (11%) who had police-initiated interaction did not differ statistically significantly. Whites (12%) were more likely than Latinos (10%) to be approached by the police. Accepting bribes from people who trade in the vices of gambling, prostitution, illegal drinking, and illicit drug usage is the most prevalent kind of police corruption.
The primary responsibility of law enforcement personnel is to assist and safeguard the public. Most law enforcement agencies are successful in doing this. Law enforcement officials, however, are seen negatively by many individuals. Citizens should know more about law enforcement and the reasons behind the measures that cops take under particular conditions.
Learn more about minority-dominated Visit: brainly.com/question/28547316
#SPJ4
the private securities litigation reform act imposes additional requirements on public companies reporting to the sec and their auditors when group of answer choices A. senior management and the board have not acted properly to correct for the act. B. the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements.
C. all of these choices are additional requirements. D. the failure to correct for the action is reasonably expected to warrant a departure from the standard audit report.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act imposes additional requirements on public companies reporting to the SEC and their auditors when the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements. (B)
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act is a piece of legislation that was signed into law in 1995. It's a United States law that was enacted to reduce the number of frivolous securities lawsuits filed against public companies, according to the Library of Congress.
The act imposes a number of additional requirements on public companies reporting to the SEC and their auditors when the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements. (B)
This is the main answer in 40 words.In other words, if the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act imposes additional requirements on public companies reporting to the SEC and their auditors.
If the illegal act does not have a material effect on the financial statements, no additional requirements are imposed on public companies reporting to the SEC and their auditors.
To know more about financial statements click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14951563#
#SPJ11
If a subsequent event occurs after the report date but prior to the release date of an audit report, resulting in management's revision of the financial statements of a non issuer, then the auditor may do any of the following, EXCEPT:
A) Maintain the original date of the report and state that the opinion is limited to the financial statements as they existed prior to the subsequent event.
B) Perform audit procedures necessary to obtain assurance about the revised financial statements.
C) Include an additional date in the audit report that is limited to the revision to the financial statements.
D) Revise the date of the audit report to reflect the necessity of additional audit procedures.
The auditor may do any of the following, EXCEPT revise the date of the audit report to reflect the necessity of additional audit procedures (option D).
An auditor is a qualified professional who reviews and validates the financial records and accounting statements of businesses or organizations to ensure that they comply with accounting principles and regulations. Auditors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of an entity's financial reports, which may include annual financial statements, tax returns, and other financial documents. They have the expertise and knowledge to evaluate and certify the reliability of an entity's financial records and disclosures, as well as to detect errors, omissions, or fraudulent activities.
Auditors play a crucial role in ensuring that businesses and organizations operate in a transparent and ethical manner and that the public can trust the financial information they provide.
Learn more about auditor at https://brainly.com/question/29785593
#SPJ11
Which of these is an act, belief, or characteristic which violates group norms and typically results in censure or punishment?
a. deviance
b. explanatory theories
c. Differential association
d. felony
The act, belief, or characteristic which violates group norms and typically results in censure or punishment is deviance. Option A is the correct answer.
Deviance is the act of deviating from the norms of society, and it is one of the key topics in sociology. A deviant act is one that is in violation of the norms or values of a specific group or society. Deviant behavior is judged to be unacceptable by the majority of society's members, and it is typically accompanied by censure or punishment. It is often referred to as a socially constructed category because it varies depending on the time and place.
Deviance is a broad concept that includes a variety of behaviors. Some examples of deviant behavior include murder, drug addiction, theft, and alcoholism. However, other behaviors, such as homosexuality or cross-dressing, can also be considered deviant depending on the norms and values of the society in which they occur.
You can learn more about Deviance at
https://brainly.com/question/7582033
#SPJ11
when deciding whether and when to interview close associates of the suspect(s), which of the following is not a concern for the investigation?
When deciding whether and when to interview close associates of the suspect(s), the investigation should consider the relevance of the information the associate can provide, the possible motivations and biases of the associate, and the potential of the associate to be a source of new information. The concern of whether the associate is a friend or not should not be taken into account when making this decision.
When deciding whether and when to interview close associates of the suspect(s), not being in a position to show the suspects their statements is not a concern for the investigation. An interview is a method of collecting information from people in which an interviewer asks questions in a pre-defined sequence. Interviews are a valuable approach of information gathering that may aid the investigation.
They may be used to learn about an incident, such as who was present, who saw what, who did what, who said what to whom, and what happened next, and to collect statements from victims, witnesses, and suspects. When deciding whether and when to interview close associates of the suspect(s), Investigators should be careful to obtain and verify as much information as possible about persons of interest before conducting an interview.
Investigators must assess the potential for contamination of statements and limit contact with people of interest as much as feasible to avoid undermining the investigation's integrity. Investigators must keep track of their interactions with people of interest in order to maintain an accurate record of events.
For more such questions on investigation
https://brainly.com/question/30541237
#SPJ11
which of the following is closest to the average annual growth rates in the united states from the 1950's to 2019?
The average annual growth rate in the United States from the 1950s to 2019 is closest to 2%.
The average annual growth rate in the United States from the 1950s to 2019 can be calculated by taking the average of the annual GDP growth rates over this period. According to the World Bank, the United States' average annual GDP growth rate from 1950 to 2019 was approximately 2.6%. Therefore, option A) 2% is the closest to the average annual growth rate during this period.
It is important to note that the United States' GDP growth rate has fluctuated over time due to various economic factors, such as recessions, booms, and changes in economic policies. For instance, the United States experienced a period of high economic growth during the 1960s, with an average annual GDP growth rate of around 4.4%. In contrast, the country experienced a recession in the early 1980s, which led to an average annual GDP growth rate of only 1.8% during that decade.
To learn more about annual growth rates visit;
https://brainly.com/question/23287647
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Which of the following options is closest to the average annual growth rates in the United States from the 1950s to 2019?
A. 1%
B. 2%
C. 3%
D. 4%
Which of the following are reasons due to which shareholders could dissolve a corporation under the RMBCA? (Check all that apply.)
- Assets are being wasted or used improperly.
- The corporation is not making a large enough profit.
- Directors are acting in illegal, oppressive, or fraudulent ways.
- Directors are deadlocked in managerial decisions and harming the corporation.
- The corporation has less than five members in its board of directors.
Directors are deadlocked in managerial decisions and harming the corporation is a reasons due to which shareholders could dissolve a corporation under the RMBCA.
The corporation's legal existence ends with its dissolution, which is essentially its "death." It is not the same as liquidation, which is the process of paying the creditors and distributing the assets. Until dissolved, a corporation endures, despite the vicissitudes of the economy or the corporation’s internal affairs.
In the event that the directors cannot agree on how to manage the company's affairs and the shareholders are unable to resolve the impasse, a shareholder may file a lawsuit asking the court to dissolve the company. In addition, shareholders may file a lawsuit for liquidation if they believe that the company's assets are being misused or wasted, or if the directors or those in charge are acting dishonestly, illegally, or oppressively.
Learn more about shareholder at:
brainly.com/question/29803660
#SPJ4
representatives in congress have attempted to repeal the twenty-second amendment several times. since 1997, representative jose e. serrano (d-ny) has sponsored at least nine different bills to achieve this goal. none has ever reached the floor for a vote. which of these arguments against the repeal is supported by the constitution?
Representatives in congress have attempted to repeal the twenty-second amendment several times.
Since 1997, representative Jose E. Serrano (D-NY) has sponsored at least nine different bills to achieve this goal.
None has ever reached the floor for a vote. Which of these arguments against the repeal is supported by the constitution?One argument against the repeal of the twenty-second amendment is that the Constitution limits the number of times a president can be elected to two.
The twenty-second amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1951 and restricts presidents from being elected to more than two terms.
The amendment was passed in response to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms in office (1933-1945).If the twenty-second amendment is repealed, there would be no term limits for the presidency, and a president could theoretically serve as many terms as they were elected for.
This would contradict the Constitution's original intent of having a president who was not an authoritarian figure.
To know more about twenty-second amendment click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/3268023#
#SPJ11
true/false. system of colonial government in which the imperialist power controlled all levels of government and appointed its own officials to govern the colony.
The statement is true. The system described here is known as direct colonialism, which was a common method of colonial government in which the imperialist power maintained complete control over the colony and its inhabitants.
This meant that the imperial power controlled all levels of government, appointed officials to govern the colony, and made all important decisions regarding economic, political, and social affairs.
Direct colonialism was often characterized by a strong military presence and a lack of political and civil rights for the indigenous population. This system was used by various European powers during the colonial period, including Great Britain, France, Spain, and Portugal, and had a profound impact on the development and structure of many modern nations.
To learn more about imperial power visit;
https://brainly.com/question/4013820
#SPJ4
Dana, an engineer, is hired to oversee construction of a new bridge in San Francisco. When the bridge collapses due to faulty construction, Dana is sued by those injured in the collapse under a theory of Negligence. As a professional, Dana is held to the same standard of care (duty of care) e) as:A) the ordinary reasonably prudent person in general society B) reasonably prudent member of her profession in the same or similar communityC) a person of average intelligenceD) none of the above
As a professional, Dana is held to the same standard of care (duty of care) as a reasonably prudent member of her profession in the same or similar community. The correct answer is B.
This means that Dana is expected to possess the knowledge and skill that is ordinarily possessed by members of her profession and to exercise a reasonable degree of care and diligence in the performance of her professional duties. The standard of care is higher for professionals than for ordinary people, as professionals are expected to have specialized knowledge and expertise in their field, and are therefore held to a higher standard of accountability.
The correct answer is B.
You can learn more about professional duties at
https://brainly.com/question/29975203
#SPJ11
parts i and ii of chapter 464 in the 2019 florida statutes applies to which individuals?
Parts I and II of Chapter 464 of the 2019 Florida Statutes apply to mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, and psychotherapists.
Part I of this chapter outlines the standards for licensure and provides definitions for these professionals. It also establishes the Board of Clinical Social Work, Marriage & Family Therapy and Mental Health Counseling, and specifies the purpose of the board and its powers and duties. Part II of this chapter covers topics such as examinations, fees, and renewals for licenses, continuing education requirements, and other topics related to the practice of mental health counseling, marriage and family therapy, and psychotherapy. It also outlines the disciplinary actions and penalties for failing to comply with any provisions of Chapter 464.
Know more about Florida Statutes here:
https://brainly.com/question/29355127
#SPJ11
why do you think the delegates focused on the right to vote?
The delegates focused on the right to vote because it was one of the essential aspects of establishing a representative government.
By conferring the power to vote on the people, they could select individuals who would represent their interests in the government. The right to vote allowed citizens to participate in the government, providing them with a sense of ownership in the government's decisions. It gave the people the power to elect representatives who would stand up for their interests and prevent the government from becoming too authoritarian, as the representatives would be accountable to the people who had elected them.
Apart from this, delegates also focused on the right to vote because they believed that all people, regardless of their social status, should have a say in how the government was run. In other words, the right to vote was a way of promoting equality in society. It gave a voice to the poor, the marginalized, and the disenfranchised and ensured that their interests were not ignored by the government.
To learn more about Government :
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ11
Which of the following dictated that the same 10-year penalty be imposed for the possession of 50 grams of crack cocaine as for the possession of 5,000 grams of powder cocaine in the 1980s
The Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act
The Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 mandated that the same 10-year penalty be imposed for the possession of 50 grams of crack cocaine as for the possession of 5,000 grams of powder cocaine.
This Act was passed with the intention of targeting the sale and possession of crack cocaine, which was more accessible and affordable in inner-city communities.
The Act failed to consider the racial implications of the disparity between the sentences, as the African-American population was disproportionately impacted by the harsh penalties.
This discrepancy was addressed in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the disparity in sentencing.
To know more about racial implications click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30942487#
#SPJ11
In 100 words or more, discuss what the different options are for sketch perspectives and what the forensic lab plays within crime scene investigation.
when filing an appeal, an appellant usually must show
Which of the following is not a reason for which the States Treasurer may deny an applicant or notary public a commission
The States Treasurer may nοt deny an applicant οr nοtary public a cοmmissiοn fοr any reasοn that wοuld viοlate the persοn's right tο equal prοtectiοn under the law, such as discriminatiοn based οn race, gender, religiοn, οr οther prοtected class. Thus, οptiοn 1 is cοrrect.
What is an applicant?An applicant is a persοn whο applies fοrmally fοr sοmething, such as a jοb, prοgram, οr lοan. The act οf applying is the prοcess οf prοviding details abοut οneself tο the οrganizatiοn οr entity that is οffering the οppοrtunity. Generally, an applicant will prοvide infοrmatiοn such as their name, cοntact details, qualificatiοns, and relevant experience.
Depending οn the οppοrtunity, the applicant may alsο need tο submit a resume, cοver letter, and οther dοcuments. The οrganizatiοn οr entity typically reviews the infοrmatiοn prοvided by the applicant and decides whether οr nοt tο accept the applicatiοn.
To learn more about applicant
brainly.com/question/30363307
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Which of the following is not a reason for which the States Treasurer may deny an applicant or notary public a commission
Any reason that would violate the person's right to equal protection under the law, such as discrimination based on race, gender, religion, or other protected class.Failure to comply with P.L. 2021, c. 179 (N.J.S.A. 52:7-10et seq.)A fraudulent, dishonest, or deceitful misstatement or omission in the application for commission as a notary public submitted to the State TreasurerA conviction of a crime of the second degree or above, but nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to supersede P.L. 1968, c. 282 (N.J.S.A. 2A:168A-1et seq.)This purpose of joint operations is to defend national interests, not only in conflict but throughpreventative measures to deter potential adversaries who could threaten the vital interests of theU.S. or its partners.
Project power despite anti-access/area denial challenges
Deter and defeat aggression
Maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent
The purpose of joint operations is to defend national interests by deterring potential adversaries and projecting power despite anti-access/area denial challenges. It aims to deter and defeat aggression, while also maintaining a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent to protect the vital interests of the U.S. and its partners.
Project power despite anti-access/area denial challenges: In order to defend national interests and prevent potential adversaries from accessing or denying certain areas, joint operations must be able to project power. This involves the development of technologies that can overcome obstacles, such as long-range missiles or other types of weaponry that could be used to deny access to certain areas. Deter and defeat aggression: Joint operations must be designed to deter and defeat aggression. This requires the development of strategies that can be used to prevent potential adversaries from engaging in hostile actions against U.S. or partner interests. This can include the use of military force, economic sanctions, or other types of pressure.Maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent: Joint operations must also be designed to maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent. This involves the development of strategies that can be used to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by potential adversaries. This can include the deployment of missile defense systems, the use of diplomatic pressure to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and the development of advanced nuclear technologies that can be used to deter potential adversaries.Learn more about Deter and defeat aggression: https://brainly.com/question/31133759
#SPJ11
Even without discriminating, the criminal justice system can exacerbate problems faced by minorities when it
.
a. does not allow people convicted of felonies to vote
b. gives sentences in the same way regardless of race
c. penalizes those who have fewer resources
d. does not account for the overrepresentation of minorities in jail
The criminal justice system can exacerbate problems faced by minorities when it "does not account for the overrepresentation of minorities in jail". Thus, Option D is correct.
Minorities, particularly Black and Latinx individuals, are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system. When the system fails to account for this overrepresentation, it perpetuates systemic inequalities and further disadvantages these groups. For example, sentencing guidelines that do not consider the systemic biases that lead to overrepresentation can result in harsher sentences for minorities.
Additionally, policies such as felon disenfranchisement, which prevent those with criminal records from voting, further disenfranchise minority communities who are already underrepresented in the political process. It is important for the criminal justice system to acknowledge and address these issues to promote a fair and just society.
Learn more about criminal justice system https://brainly.com/question/30647496
#SPJ11
Deborah sells her property to Juan, but Juan fails to record the deed. Which of the following statements is true about unrecorded deeds?1) The conveyance is invalid2) The deed is still valid between Deb and Juan3) The deed provides constructive notice that Juan is the owner4) The property with the unrecorded deed will escheat to the county where it is located when Juan dies
Deborah sells her property to Juan, but Juan fails to record the deed, The deed is still valid between Deb and Juan. The correct option is 2.
Executing a deed is the method used to transfer ownership, also known as "alienation of title," from one party to another. An official document known as a deed is used to transfer ownership rights to real property from one person or organization (the grantor) to another (the grantee). A deed is typically filed with the county recorder of deeds in the area. The public is informed by the deed's recording that the grantee is now the property's legitimate owner.
For the grantee, not recording a deed can lead to issues. They might not be able to sell the property, get a mortgage, or get insurance on it. Even more problematically, an unrecorded deed might allow the grantor to sell the property to one buyer and then sell it to a different buyer later on. As a result, the original purchaser who neglected to record the deed might lose ownership of the property. The correct option is 2.
Learn more about deed at:
brainly.com/question/17214313
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. The majority of correctional activity takes place at the ________ level.
The majority of correctional activity takes place at the state level.
Involuntary commitment, parole, and probation are all considered to be under "correctional control," as are federal prisons, state prisons, local jails, youth detention centers, and Indian Country jails. The most common type of correctional control, probation, allows offenders to live in the community while being closely monitored by a probation office, ostensibly as an alternative to incarceration.
In US academia, terminology changed from "penology" to "corrections" in the 1950s and 1960s as a result of a shift in emphasis toward rehabilitation. It was accompanied by actual changes made in some prisons, such as granting inmates more privileges and making an effort to foster a more communal environment.
Learn more about Involuntary commitment at:
brainly.com/question/14318641
#SPJ4
what does the public law regulate
Public law sees on constitutional, administrative and criminal law. Public law is the part of law that governs relations between legal persons and a government.
Also between different institutions within a state, between different branches of government and relations between persons of direct interest to society.
An illustration of a public law?The entitlement to social benefits, which are only available to natural persons and are given by administrative action of the state budget, is a prime illustration of public law. Slippage laws could say to both public and private legislation.
Does it mean in the legal context?Not private; under the control of the government; or belongs to and accessible to the public. It could be referring to a thing, an organization, or something you do.
To know more about Public Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29358001
#SPJ1
which countries received weapons from the u.s. under the lend-lease act.
Under the Lend-Lease Act, the United States provided military aid, including weapons and equipment, to various countries during World War II.
Some of the countries that received weapons from the U.S. under the lend-lease act are as follows: United Kingdom: The United Kingdom was the largest beneficiary of U.S. military aid, receiving over $31 billion worth of lend-lease supplies, including aircraft, tanks, ammunition, and other equipment.
Soviet Union: The Soviet Union received over $11 billion in lend-lease aid, including trucks, jeeps, aircraft, and tanks. This aid was critical in helping the Soviet Union defeat the Germans on the Eastern Front. China: China received over $1.5 billion in lend-lease aid, including aircraft, trucks, and ammunition. This aid was crucial in the Chinese resistance against the Japanese during World War II.
France: France received lend-lease aid totaling over $3 billion, including aircraft, tanks, and trucks. The aid helped to support French forces fighting in North Africa and the Mediterranean, as well as the French resistance movement.
Norway: Norway received lend-lease aid totaling over $300 million, including aircraft, tanks, and other equipment. This aid was critical in the Norwegian resistance movement against the Germans during World War II.
To learn more about Lend-Lease Act :
https://brainly.com/question/30392276
#SPJ11
Detective Smith wants to bring a forensic geologist to help her with her current case. Why does the detective most likely need assistance?
The detective most likely needs assistance from a forensic geologist because they specialize in studying and analyzing geological materials and processes that may be relevant to a crime scene.
Forensic geologists can help identify and analyze evidence such as soil, rocks, minerals, and other natural materials found at the scene of a crime. They can also help determine the origin and age of these materials, which can be useful in determining the timeline and location of events related to the crime. Additionally, a forensic geologist can provide valuable insight into natural disasters and other geological events that may have contributed to the crime or affected the evidence.
Learn more about detective
https://brainly.com/question/27524117
#SPJ4
Although several events in U.S. history led to bureaucratic growth, one event stands out for leading to policy changes that dramatically increased growth in both bureaucratic agencies and personnel. That event was
The event that dramatically increased bureaucratic growth in both agencies and personnel in the U.S. was the New Deal of 1933, which was the name given to a series of economic and social reforms created by President Franklin Roosevelt.
The New Deal included laws and reforms that sought to help those affected by the Great Depression and strengthen the economy. It created a number of new governmental programs, including the Social Security Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The New Deal also increased the size and role of the federal government, with its many new agencies, and expanded the power of the President. It provided jobs for millions of Americans and new regulations for businesses.
The New Deal also increased taxes and strengthened labor unions, allowing for workers to have greater job security.
Overall, the New Deal was responsible for significantly expanding the size and scope of the federal government and its bureaucracy.
To know more about Great Depression click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
Elaborate on the evidence that shows the Hooman Khanloo's (appellant) exclusive use of room No. 1109? in case Dato ARahman
Answer:
The case of Dato ArRahman involves a dispute over a property at the Platinum Park, Kuala Lumpur. One of the key pieces of evidence in the case is related to the exclusive use of room No. 1109 by Hooman Khanloo, the appellant in the case.
According to the evidence presented in the case, Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for a period of time. The evidence shows that the appellant was the only person who had access to the room and had the authority to use it. The evidence also shows that Hooman Khanloo had been living in the room for some time and had made significant changes to the room to make it his own.
In addition to this, the evidence shows that Hooman Khanloo had been paying the rent for the room and had been using it for his personal and business purposes. The appellant had also made significant investments in the room, such as purchasing and installing furniture and equipment.
The evidence presented in the case also includes witness testimony that supports the claim of Hooman Khanloo's exclusive use of the room. Witnesses who had interacted with Hooman Khanloo in the past testified that they had seen him using the room for various purposes, including business meetings and personal use.
Overall, the evidence presented in the case suggests that Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for a significant period of time and had made significant investments in the room. This evidence is important because it helps establish the appellant's claim to the property and supports his argument that he had a right to continue using the room.
A new goal of punishment that has emerged over the last decade is called justice. This process advocates a type of punishment that is designed to repair losses to the victim and the community while attempting to keep the offender connected to society.
a. retributive
b. restorative
c. reconstructive
d. restrictive
Restorative justice is the type of punishment that advocates repairing the losses of the victims and the community while simultaneously trying to connect the offender to society. Option (b) is the correct answer.
Retributive justice: Retributive justice is the punishment of criminals, which includes imprisonment or fines as a consequence of a crime.
Its goal is to deter the individual from committing crimes in the future by making him or her fearful of the punishment that would follow.
Restorative justice: Restorative justice, on the other hand, emphasizes repairing the injury and reestablishing communication between the offender and the victim.
This helps in maintaining healthy relations in society. Reconstructive justice: Reconstructive justice is a system that emphasizes improving society's overall framework to prevent individuals from committing criminal acts in the first place.
Restrictive justice: Restrictive justice is a type of punishment where the offender is confined and kept away from society. The punishment is in the form of imprisonment, probation, or parole, and it intends to ensure that the offender does not engage in criminal activities again.
To know more about Restorative justice refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28913925#
#SPJ11
Describe the THREE (3) elements of possession that were established in Dato ARahman case.
Answer:
In the Dato' Menteri Othman bin Baginda & Anor v Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim case, which is commonly referred to as the "Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim Sodomy II" case, there were three elements of possession that were established by the Malaysian courts. These elements are:
Actual possession: This refers to physical control over an object or thing. In the case of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, he was found to have had actual possession of the semen-stained mattress on which the alleged sodomy occurred.
Exclusive possession: This means that the person in possession has the right to exclude others from using or accessing the object. In this case, the court found that Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim had exclusive possession of the mattress, as no one else had used or accessed it since the alleged incident.
Intention to possess: This element refers to the mental state of the person in possession, in that they must have the intention to possess the object. In this case, the court found that Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim had the intention to possess the mattress, as he had kept it in his possession for several years and had not disposed of it.
"Why are minorities (Predominately Black & Latino) arrested/incarcerated at a higher rate than other races"
Explanation:
Black and Latinx Americans in each state, identifies three contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in imprisonment