The factors of the polynomial are
A.(x + 1)(2+ix)(2-ix)
B.(x-1)(2+ix)(2-ix)
C.(x-1)[x-(3+1)][x-(4-1)]
D.(x+1)(x+(2+1)][x- (2-1)]
E.(x-1)[x+(2+1)][x- (2-1)]

Answer:

You don't need experiments to ask people questions

Answer: C electricity

Step-by-step explanation:

It is

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = 3x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 3x−5

This is in slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

m =3

Parallel lines have the same slope

We have the slope m=3 and a point (2,0)

y = mx+b

y = 3x+b

Substituting the point into the equation to solve for b

0 = 3(2)+b

0 = 6+b

b = -6

y = 3x-6

Answer:

y = 3x - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slope,

So m = 3

y - 0 = 3(x - 2)

y = 3x - 6

Answer:

Jumbo burger with fried is 75%

chicken with salad is 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

you first split the burger and sides. You add up the sides to find the salad. Then add up the sides and burgers

Answer:

What is the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwich with a Salad? Make an area or tree diagram to help with the problem.

Answer to question: 20% for Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries and 10.5% for Chicken Sandwich with a Salad.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are going to find the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwhich with a Salad by using a area model or a tree diagram. Although you ddin't ask me to solve it, I'm gonna help you with it anyways.

Sandwhiches:

50% - Jumbo Burger (JB)

30% - Chicken Sandwich (CS)

20% - Regular Burger (RB)

Sides:

40% - Curly Fries (CF)

35% - Salad (S)

25% - Regular Fries (RF)

Acronyms

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Curly Fries (CF) = JBCF

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Salad (S) = JBS

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Regular Fries (RF) = JBRF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Curly Fries (CF) = CSCF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Salad (S) = CSS

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Regular Fries (RF) = CSRF

Regular Burger (RB) + Curly Fries (CF) = RBCF

Regular Burger (RB) + Salad (S) = RBS

Regular Burger (RB) + Regular Fries (RF) = RBRF

Probability of combinations:

JBCF = 0.5 x 0.4 = 0.20

JBS = 0.5 x 0.35 = 17.5

JBRF = 0.5 x 0.25 = 12.5

CSCF = 0.3 x 0.4 = 12

CSS = 0.3 x 0.35 = 10.5

CSRF = 0.3 x 0.25 = 7.5

RBCF = 0.2 x 0.4 = 8

RBS = 0.2 x 0.35 = 7

RBRF = 0.2 x 0.25 = 5

Your tree diagram should look something like this:

         CF(40%)- outcome - JBCF (20%)

          /  

(50%)JB ---  S(35%)-  outcome - JBS (17.5%)

           \            

           RF(25%)-  outcome - JBRF (12.5%)

         CF(40%)- outcome - CSCF (12%)

          /

(30%)CS ---  S(35%)- outcome - CSS (10.5%)

            \

            RF(25%)- outcome - CSRF (7.5%)

           CF(40%)- outcome - RBCF (8%)

           /

(20%)RB ---  S(35%)- outcome - RBS (7%)

          \

          RF(25%)- outcome - RBRF (5%)

Hope this helps because this took forever :D

answer would be A because it u factor it out you will get your initial equation

Answer:

If Raven's monthly payment were $125, the amount of the loan that she is considering taking out  would be less than $43,205.56.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you think about it this way it may be more simple. If the APR stays constant then a greater payment will result in a greater loan. The opposite is also true meaning a lesser payment will result in a lesser loan. If the amount Raven pays is greater than $145 then the loan will be greater than $43,205.56. If the amount she pays is less than $145 then the loan will be less than $43,205.56. Of the options, only one of these situations will be present. In my case, the correct option was a payment of $125 will result in a lesser loan than $43,205.56.

Answer:

If Raven's monthly payment were $125, the amount of the loan that she is considering taking out  would be less than $43,205.56.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

b) [tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=130[/tex] represent the sample mean for the amount spent each shopper

[tex]s=40[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=80[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =120[/tex] represent the value to verify

t would represent the statistic    

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value f

Part a

We want to verify if the shoppers participating in the loyalty program spent more on average than typical shoppers, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

The statistic for this case would be given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.09

because I multiplied...

Answer:

0.09

Step-by-step explanation:

36/ 10 x 25/ 1000 = 18/ 5 x 1/40 = 9/100 = 0.09

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B. 1/3 multiplied by k=7

Step-by-step explanation:

7 ÷ ⅓ = k

Multiply both sides by ⅓

7 ÷ ⅓ × ⅓ = k × ⅓

7 = k × ⅓

Answer:24

Step-by-step explanation:

Height =4

Base=6

Area of parallelogram=base x height

Area of parallelogram=6 x 4

Area of parallelogram=24

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

It should just be 104 divided by 8 which equals=13

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

  Draw perpendicular bisectors of two the sides

Step-by-step explanation:

The point that is the same distance from each of their houses is the point called the "circumcenter." It is the center of the circle that passes through the vertices of the triangle. Then each of the vertices is the same distance from the center.

The circumcenter is the intersection point of the perpendicular bisectors of the sides of the triangle. To find it, the group needs to draw perpendicular bisectors of two of the sides.

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

EDGE2020

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the PMF of the points that the team receive, we must determine the probabilities of winning each of the games.

Consider the firt game. We know that the probability of not losing is 0.4. Since the team can either lose the game or not, we have that the probability of losing it is 0.6. We are told that given that the team does not lose, the probability of winning or having a tie is the same. Recall that, given events A, B, the conditional probability P(A|B) (which means probability of A given B) is given as

[tex]P(A|B) = \frac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)}[/tex]

in our case, we have that B:= not losing the game. Consider A:= To win the game, C:= To tie the game. We know that P(A|B)=P(C|B). When the team doesn't lose, then the team either ties or wins, this means that

[tex]P(A|B)+P(C|B) = 1[/tex]

So we get that P(A|B) = P(C|B) = 1/2. Let us find P(A)

[tex]P(A|B) = \frac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)} = \frac{P(A)}{P(B)}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Then [tex]P(A) = \frac{P(B)}{2} = 0.2[/tex]. By an analogous calculation we have that P(A) = P(C) = 0.2.

We will define the following events: [tex]W_i[/tex] is the event that the team wins the game i, [tex]T_i[/tex] is the event that the team ties the game i and [tex]L_i[/tex] is the event that the team loses the game i. In this notation, we have that

[tex]P(W_1) = P(T_1) = 0.2, P(L_1) = 0.6[/tex]

By reasoning the same way for the second game, we can calculate that

[tex]P(W_2)=P(T_2)=0.35, P(L_2) = 0.3[/tex]

To calculate the PMF we must check all the possible outcomes of the results of both games. Since we can either win (W), tie(T) or lose(L) a game, we will express the outcome as follows TW(3) means that the team ties  the first game and wins the second one, for a total of points. In this way, the possible outcomes are

WW(4), WT(3), WL(2), TW(3), TT(2), TL(1), LW(2), LT(1), LL(0)

We see that the number of possible points are 0,1,2,3,4. Let X be the number of points, to get the pmf of X is to give the probability P(X=k) for k=0,1,2,3,4 explicitly. Note that since each game is independent of each other, to get the probability of one of the outcomes it suffices to multiply the probability of each event. For example we have that [tex]P(WW) = P(W_1)\cdotP(W_2) = 0.07[/tex]

Then, the pmf is given by

[tex]P(X=0) = P(LL) = 0.18[/tex]

[tex]P(X=1)=P(LT)+P(TL) = 0.27[/tex]

[tex]P(X=2)=P(LW)+P(TT)+P(WL) = 0.34[/tex]

[tex]P(X=3)=P(WT)+P(TW) = 0.14[/tex]

[tex]P(X=4)=P(WW)= 0.07[/tex]

Answer:

vertex is: (4,-9)

y intercept= (0,7)

roots= (1,0) and (7,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

so we can use factoring to solve this quadratic equation real quick:

x^2-7x-1x+7

x(x-7)

-1(x-7)

(x-1)(x-7)=0

x-1=0

x=1

x-7=0

x=7

(1,0) and (7,0) are the roots

axis of symmetry: 8/2=4

substitute axsis of symmetry in equation to get vertex:

4^2-8(4)+7

16-32+7

-16+7=-9

vertex is: (4,-9)

y intercept= (0,7)

roots= (1,0) and (7,0)

Hope this helps

Answer:

[2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

[0,1), [0,1),[0,1),[0,1)

[1,2), [1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2)

[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3)

[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4)

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

  y = -7x +8

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope-intercept form of the equation of a line is ...

  y = mx +b

where m represents the slope, and b represents the y-intercept. The y-intercept is the value of y when x=0. Here, you have m=-7 and b=8. Your equation is ...

  y = -7x +8

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Ummmm 2 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

35%

Step-by-step explanation:

The total number of cinema seats can seat 280 people. Since 98 people take up 98 seats of the cinema, they are taking up 98 cinema seats out of the 280 cinema seats originally available.

As a fraction this would be written as  [tex]\frac{98}{280}[/tex] .

What you want to do is then divide 98 by 280 or 98/280, to get 0.35.

To get the percentage of seats filled, you must multiply the decimal you get by 100.

So it should look like this and your result should be 35%.

[tex]\frac{98}{280} = 0.35 *100=35[/tex]%

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the numbers greater than nine are: 10,11,12

1,3,5,7,9

So that is nine numbers

9/12 can be simplified to 3/4 if you divide by 3

if you like my answer please give me the brainliest. I'm trying to boost my rank and I'm really close