Answer:i think its A
Explanation:
true or False : Privileged communication is a legal concept that protects clients from having their confidential communications revealed in court without their permission
It is true to say that Privileged communication on is a legal concept that protects clients from having their confidential communications revealed in court without their permission.
The attorney-client privilege is one such privilege that has been in existence for a long time and is applicable in all legal contexts. Communications between an attorney and a client made with the intention of receiving legal counsel may not be divulged without the client's agreement. There are legal restrictions on everything, even disclosure by one of the parties. A privileged communication relationship can be invalidated by several exceptions, though. Additionally, privileged communication may be waived in a number of situations, whether on purpose or accidentally. Relationships between a lawyer and a client, a doctor or therapist and a patient, and a priest and a parishioner are frequently mentioned as examples of situations in which privileged communication exists.
Know more about the Privileged communication at: https://brainly.com/question/29679349
#SPJ4
kat is fifteen. in most states, for contractual purposes, kat would be considered a minor until she is
kat is fifteen. in most states, for contractual purposes, kat would be considered a minor until she is eighteen.
The primary purpose of a contract is to formalize a new relationship and outline the various legal obligations each party has to the other. Today, most contracts are between companies rather than between individuals.
In a contract, the intent is the decision of the parties to act or perform in a particular way. This is the state of mind in which the parties enter into their contractual obligations.
The contractual agreement is another term sometimes used instead of "contract". A contractual agreement is therefore a legally enforceable agreement made by two or more parties that they may or may not do one or more things specified in the contract.
Learn more about contractual purposes here
https://brainly.com/question/29311983
#SPJ4
measuring the criminal justice system impacts of marijuana legalization and decriminalization using state data
State data indicates decriminalising & legalising cannabis have little influence on overall crime rates; in some cases, it may even reduce crime rates. Local studies reveal retail sales after legalisation may have conflicting impacts on crime rates.
Removing all governmental restrictions on cannabis is the procedure of legalising it. Similar to how cigarettes and alcohol are available to the general adult population for purchase and usage at will with regard to cannabis. Decriminalization is the process of eliminating criminal penalties from a behaviour, item, or act. Cannabis would still be illegal if it were decriminalised, but no one would be prosecuted for possessing less than a certain quantity. Instead, there would be a spectrum of sanctions, including no sanctions at all, civil fines, drug education, and drug treatment.
To know more about cannabis:
brainly.com/question/28701225
#SPJ4
Tax planning motivations usually predominate over other objectives in deciding whether to create a trust.
It is untrue that when deciding whether to create a trust, tax planning considerations typically take precedence over other goals. Instead, the choice to establish a trust is made before considering the tax implications.
Financial planning aimed at reducing taxes is referred to as tax planning. It aims to lower one's tax obligations and make the best use of benefits, tax breaks, and exemptions.Making financial and business decisions to reduce the impact of tax is a part of tax planning.Although there are many ways to approach tax planning, it primarily entails three fundamental strategies: lowering your actual income, maximizing the amount of tax deductions you claim throughout the year, and utilizing certain tax credits.Long ago, the fundamentals of effective taxation were established. The four pillars of efficiency, fairness, certainty and convenience were proposed by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776).Therefore, it is false that tax planning concerns tend to take primacy over other objectives when deciding whether to create a trust.
Learn more about Tax planning here: https://brainly.com/question/28330970
#SPJ4
sweden government owns several important industries, but much of the property remains in private hands, and political freedom is widespread
Sweden is generally defined as a social democracy, or democratic socialist country
A blend of private freedoms, centralised economic planning, and government regulation make up Sweden's mixed economic system. Member of the European Union is SwedenBecause the government participates in planning the use of some resources and has the power to impose restrictions on privately owned enterprises, mixed economic systems are not pure laissez-faire systems. The private sector may be taxed by governments in an effort to redistribute wealth, and they may also use tax revenue to advance social goals.To know more about Economy here
https://brainly.com/question/18760376
#SPJ4
the effort by congress, through hearings, investigations, and other techniques, to exercise control over the activities of executive agencies is known as which of the following?
The effort of Congress, through hearings, investigations, and other techniques, to exercise control over the activities of executive agencies is called congressional oversight.
The congressional oversight can be referred to or considered as practice that takes place in a number of initiatives taken by the Congress. Moreover, the oversight is done by a separate committee formed for the purpose of the same. In addition to that, evaluation of the congress staff and organizations is also done by the committee of congressional oversight.
Learn more about congressional oversight here:
https://brainly.com/question/813888
#SPJ4
Complete question
The effort of Congress, through hearings, investigations, and other techniques to exercise control over the activities of executive agencies is called ___________,
the equal employment opportunity commission (eeoc) has completed its investigation regarding jeremiah's discrimination case against his employer. if the eeoc decides not to sue his employer, it will issue jeremiah a .
The federal organisation that upholds the laws against workplace harassment and discrimination is the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. the federal law that forbids employers from paying women and men different wages for work that is substantially equivalent.
The EEOC began operations on July 2, 1965, after being established by Congress to uphold Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C., and as of 2021, it operated 37 additional field offices in 15 different districts across the United States.If a company has 15 or more employees, it must comply with the law (20 or more employees for age discrimination cases). All workplace practises, such as hiring, firing, promotions, harassment, training, pay, and benefits, are subject to the laws.The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for upholding federal laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of a person's race, colour, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information.In light of this, the United States is the federal entity that upholds the laws prohibiting workplace harassment and discrimination.
Learn more about EEOC here: https://brainly.com/question/14774625
#SPJ4
populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are
Populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are it has institutions such as a parliament, prime minister, or other public officials.
It is frequently associated with anti-established order and anti-political sentiment. The term developed inside the late nineteenth century and has been applied to numerous politicians, events and movements considering that that point, frequently as a pejorative.
The Populist motion changed into a rise up through farmers within the South and Midwest in opposition to the Democratic and Republican events for ignoring their pastimes and difficulties. For over a decade, farmers had been suffering from crop disasters, falling charges, negative advertising, and lack of credit score facilities.
Farmers inside the South and Midwest revolted against the Democratic and Republican parties for ignoring their concerns and issues, resulting in the Populist movement. Charismatic or influential figures who gift themselves as the "voice of the people" regularly lead
They demanded an increase within the circulating forex (to be executed by the limitless coinage of silver), a graduated earnings tax, authorities possession of the railroads, a tariff for sales simplest, the direct election of U.S. senators, and different measures designed to bolster political democracy and deliver farmers .
Learn more about Populism arises here
https://brainly.com/question/11716977
#SPJ4
who among the following dominated the politics and government of the republic of texas? multiple select question. sam houston allan shivers bill clements stephen austin mirabeau lamar
Out of the choices provided above, it can be said that Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar dominated the politics and government of the Republic of Texas. Therefore, the options A and D hold true.
The Republic of Texas was an independently governed state, and was not a part of the United States for a prolonged period of time. Its constitution was completely different from that of the United States, and the national constitution was not applicable or enforceable in the state of Texas. Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar were the political leaders who dominated the Republic of Texas.
Learn more about the Republic of Texas here:
https://brainly.com/question/12880388
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. in multiparty negotiations, research shows that parties who approached multiple issues simultaneously achieved lower quality agreements and decreased the likelihood of achieving agreement compared with groups that approached the issues one at a time, in a fixed or negotiated sequence.
A group of three or more people, each representing their own interests, engage in a multi-party negotiation in an effort to overcome apparent conflicts of interest or cooperate to accomplish a common goal.
The following are the distinctions between two-party and multiparty talks that make multiparty negotiations more complicated, demanding, and tough to manage: Parties: There are more negotiators present in multiparty discussions. Informational and computational complexity - Multiparty discussions include the introduction of more topics, viewpoints on issues, and overall information. Social complexity - The social setting shifts from an individual conversation to a group discussion. As a result, all the small-group dynamics start to influence how the negotiators act. The parties' motivational orientations toward one another may affect how the process develops. There could be social pressure for the group to behave in unison.
learn more about multiparty negotiations here:
https://brainly.com/question/29741447
#SPJ4
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as ____________ powers.
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as legislative powers.
Legislative power is the capacity of a legislative chamber or actors within that chamber to thwart, encourage, or compel actions by others. introduction. energy is a hard concept to outline and possibly even harder to measure.
All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it's miles the only part of the government that could make new legal guidelines or trade current legal guidelines. govt department groups problem policies with the full pressure of law, but these are only below the authority of laws enacted by Congress.
The legislative branch of government is liable for enacting the laws of the country and appropriating the cash necessary to operate the government.
Learn more about Legislative here: https://brainly.com/question/13267720
#SPJ4
The number of federal government employees has
There are 18.83 federal government employees.
The federal government is the highest authority in the United States. It is a federal republic with 50 states, a city inside a federal district, five significant autonomous territories, and several island possessions. Washington is the colloquial name for the federal government's legislative, executive, and judicial branches. According to the U.S. Constitution, these branches are each under the control of the president, the Congress, and the federal courts. Acts of Congress, such as the establishment of executive agencies and courts that are subordinate to the Supreme Court, further clarify the roles and responsibilities of these bodies.
Learn more about government from
brainly.com/question/220248
#SPJ4
which of the designs violate(s) the first law of thermodynamics? give the letter(s) of the design(s) in alphabetical order, without commas or spaces (e.g., acd).
A perpetual motion machine of the first sort is a device that defies the First Law of Thermodynamics by producing energy.
The second law's validity is statistical rather than mathematical because it rests on the fact that the bodies we deal with are made up of millions of molecules. Because of this, any efficiency tiny set of molecules consistently and significantly violates the first law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics is broken by a heat engine that claims to be more efficient than the Carnot efficiency. The first law clearly states that no apparatus that produces heat or meaningful work can exist without using energy from some source. Since it was established 140 years ago, there have never been any exceptions to this rule. These kinds of machines are unreal and go against the first law of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics has a flaw in that it says nothing about the direction in which heat flows. No efficiency is given as to whether the procedure is spontaneous or not. The process cannot be reversed. In reality, not all of the heat is converted into work.
Learn more about first law of thermodynamics here:
brainly.com/question/3808473
#SPJ4
Joint rate means a rate which applies over the lines or routes of 2 or more carriers, which is made by arrangement or agreement between such carriers, and which is evidenced by concurrence or power of attorney." Joint tariffs " are those which contain joint rates.
Joint rate refers to a rate established between places on and over the permitted lines or routes of two or more carriers and supported by a power of attorney or concurrence. Such a tariff is referred to as a "combined tariff."
A rate established by agreement and published in a single tariff by all transportation lines to which it applies, and applicable from a point on one line to a point on another. The Commission gives filers the option of choosing between individual tariffs or a single market-based rate tariff for their whole company family. Corporate families can more easily arrange their computerized tariff databases, tariff records, and reporting requirements thanks to these so-called shared tariffs. When a corporate family uses a shared tariff, only the designated filer is required to submit tariff updates, such as when the category status changes or when the language in the tariff that has been approved by the Commission needs to be updated.
Learn more about Joint rate from
brainly.com/question/22595619
#SPJ4
in california, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
Indeed in California, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
About Exculpatory Clause
A contract's exculpatory provision forbids one party of holding the other party accountable for harm caused by the contract. Exculpatory clauses are frequently included in purchases like those that come with a ticket to a theme park or a flight. Courts may strike down exculpatory terms when they are buried inside a contract or have too broad of scope that goes against public policy. Courts frequently disapprove of exculpatory clauses since they allow a party to avoid accountability.
It is a clause in a contract that aims to absolve one party of responsibility if the other party suffers harm.
To know more about Exculpatory Clause:
brainly.com/question/27222495
#SPJ4
based on the above table, which information provides an example of individual interest groups maximizing their chances of creating influential relationships in congress
Interest groups in securities, investments, and real estate contributed approximately $50 million, or a nearly equal share, to each congressional political party can be said to be attempt of interest groups maximizing their chances.
About Interest groups
Interest groups, also known as special interest groups, advocacy groups, or pressure groups, are associations of people or organisations that are often formally constituted and that aim to sway public policy in their favour based on one or more common concerns. All interest groups have the common objective to influence governmental policy in order to advance their causes or themselves. Their objective may be a policy that only helps a certain set of people or a particular sector of society (such as government aid for farmers) or a policy which furthers a larger societal aim (e.g., improving air quality). By exerting pressure on decision-makers to change policy outcomes in the favour, they try to lobby in order to achieve their aims.
The question is incomplete so I have answered it in general sense as per my knowledge.
To know more about Interest groups:
brainly.com/question/28590155
#SPJ4
Which are rights of U.S. citizens who are convicted of a crime?
the right to join the military
the right to a speedy trial
the right to talk to an attorney
the right to an education while in jail
the right to make at least one phone call every day
Select all that apply.
Answer: The right to make at least one phone call and the right to talk to an attorney
Explanation:
Which of the following Article of the Indian Constitution contains Fundamental Duties?
(a) 45 A
(b) 51 A
(c) 42
(d) 30B
Article 51A of the Indian Constitution addresses fundamental duties, which are non-justiciable in nature. The Russian constitution served as a model for the concept of fundamental duties.
The 42nd constitutional amendment act of 1976 added fundamental duties to the Indian constitution.
How does Article 51A work?h) to cultivate an attitude of scientific inquiry, humanism, and reformation; i) to avoid violence and protect public property; j) to constantly strive for excellence in all areas of individual and collective activity so that the nation continuously achieves greater heights.
Are Articles 21 and 45 equivalent?It has added Article 21A (Right to Education as a Fundamental Right), replaced Article 45 (Early Childhood Education) of Directive principles of State policy, and amended Article 51A (Fundamental Duties) to include a new obligation on the part of parents to educate their children between the ages of six and fourteen.
To learn more about Indian Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/28391653
#SPJ4
In order to conduct a legal search, officers must show that ______ exists that evidence of a crime will be found.
a. reasonable suspicion
b. reasonable doubt
c. probable cause
d. clear and convincing evidence
Option C is correct. In order to conduct a legal search, officers must show that probable cause exists that evidence of a crime will be found.
About probable cause
According to American criminal law, a police officer must have probable cause before being granted a warrant for the arrest of just a suspect or the issuance of a search warrant. Probable cause does not have a standard meaning or wording. One common definition, which derives from the 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision Beck v. Ohio, asks whether the circumstances and facts that [an officer] knew about and had reasonably reliable information about at the time of [the suspect's] arrest [were] sufficient to justify a prudent [person] in having faith that [a suspect] had involved or was committing an offence. Additionally, it serves as the benchmark for indictments of criminals by grand juries.
To know more about Probable cause:
brainly.com/question/29617865
#SPJ4
The US Supreme Court ruling that mandates that people arrested receive certain rights and have those rights explained to them is
a. Hammer v. McCulloch.
b. Marbury v. Madison.
c. Griswold v. Connecticut.
d. Miranda v. Arizona.
The US Supreme Court ruling that mandates that people arrested receive certain rights and have those rights explained to them is Miranda v. Arizona.
The right to stay silent, the right to have legal representation present while being questioned, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer if the suspect cannot afford one are all examples of what are known as Miranda rights. In court, defendants cannot be penalized for remaining silent. Pre-Miranda silence, on the other hand, is when a suspect is silent after not having had his or her Miranda rights read to them. Then, silence can be interpreted as strange and suspicious.
By saying something like, "My attorney has always taught me not to give comments without him present," a suspect may be able to escape the harmful effects of silence.
Learn more about Miranda right here: https://brainly.com/question/2242029
#SPJ4
char and dill sign a written contract for the sale of dill's bbq food truck to char. the parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement. later, dill disputes some of the provisions in the deal with char. if the dispute results in litigation, a court will most likely exclude evidence that
The correct option (b) contradicts the written terms
An employer must give written terms (a 'written statement of employment particulars') explaining pay, working hours and other rights and responsibilities, to both employees and workers. Employers must provide written terms: no matter how long the person's employed for. on or before the person's first day of work.
The written statement is made up of: the main document (known as a 'principal statement')
The principal statement must include at least:the employer's name.the employee's or worker's name, job title or a description of work and start date.how much and how often an employee or worker will get paid.Learn more about Written trems To visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/13169523
#SPJ4
Char and Dill sign a written contract for the sale of Dill's BBQ Food Truck to Char. The parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement. Later, Dill disputes some of the provisions in the deal with Char. If the dispute results in litigation, a court will most likely exclude evidence that
A. duplicates the written terms
B. contradicts the written terms
C. reinforces the written terms
D. supports the written terms
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non-verbal expressions is known as a symbolic speech. Therefore, the option A holds true.
A symbolic speech can be referred to or considered as a speech wherein the expression is done in completely non-verbal modes of communication with the audience. Moreover, it may also involve actions and gestures to be used as symbols in the scope of development of a speech to connect better with the audience.
Learn more about symbolic speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/29794726
#SPJ4
Complete Question
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
Symbolic Speech
Seditious Speech
Commercial Speech
Judy owns 425 shares of stock, with a basis of $2712. The stock split 3 to 1. Judy now owns what?
Answer:
Explanation:If the stock split 3 to 1, this means that for every 1 share of stock that Judy owned, she now owns 3 shares. Since Judy owned 425 shares of stock before the split, she now owns 3 * 425 = 1275 shares of stock.
The basis of the stock, which is the original cost of the stock, does not change as a result of a stock split. Therefore, Judy's basis for the 1275 shares of stock is still $2712.
Based on the information, Judy now owns 1,275 shares and the price per share is $2.12
What is Stock?The holding certificates of any corporation are referred to as "stocks". Stocks signify ownership in a public company's business. The company's stock is made up of those little shares, and by purchasing stock in the company, you are depending on its long-term success and growth.
The quantity of outstanding shares increases by a fixed amount whenever there is a stock split. In the event of a 3 for 1 stock split, each shareholder will now own 3 shares instead of only 1.
Number of shares owned = 425 x 3 = 1,275 shares
The price of the stock decreases per share when there is a stock split.
Value per share = $2712 / 1,275 = $2.12
Hence, Judy currently owns 1,275 shares at a cost of $2.12.
learn more about stock splits, here:
brainly.com/question/25513890
#SPJ2
discribe about the posibile impact of respecting cultural gambr reliogion and political equality multc nation states like
through which of the following theories can an employee-plaintiff prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964?
Through the following theories, an employee-plaintiff can prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964
Disparate treatmentDisparate impactDisparate equityDisparate treatment, disparate impact, and disparate equityDisparate treatment and disparate impact, but not disparate equityWhat is Disparate impact?Generally, In the context of employment and housing law in the United States, the term "disparate effect" refers to actions that negatively affect one group of persons with a protected feature more than another, despite the fact that the laws implemented by employers or landlords are legally neutral.
An example of a disproportionate effect would be the employment of more males than women in the construction industry due to physical height or strength requirements (unintentional discrimination).
Read more about employee-plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/28547296
#SPJ1
in troll line fishing company's suit against uniharvest, inc., the jury returns a verdict in troll line's favor. uniharvest files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to troll line, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. this is a motion for
Uniharvest files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to troll line, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for judgment n.o.v.
A decision as a matter of law that is occasionally given following a jury trial is known as judgement notwithstanding the verdict, also known as judgement non obstante veredicto, or JNOV. Non obstante veredicto, which can be translated as "notwithstanding the verdict," is the Latin phrase for which the abbreviation NOV was created. In the context of JNOV (judgement non obstante veredicto), NOV or non obstante veredicto is typically used to refer to a judgement entered for one party despite a jury's verdict.
To know more about jury
https://brainly.com/question/28580385
#SPJ4
in a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of what entity that the defendant is guilty?
In a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of victim's family that the defendant is guilty.
What is bench trial?Bench trials, as opposed to jury trials, are judge-led trials. To distinguish the type of trial, the term is most appropriately used in relation to any administrative hearing regarding a summary offense. Bench trials are used in many legal systems for most or all cases, or for particular types of cases.
In a bench trial, the judge determines the procedural and evidentiary matters and serves as the fact-finder in place of the jury. The judge will render judgments, consider the evidence, and determine whether or not the defendant is guilty.
The trial procedure should be the same whether it is a bench trial or a jury trial, and if you are found guilty, you have the right to appeal your conviction to a higher court.
Learn more about bench trial
https://brainly.com/question/1150855
#SPJ1
cases in which the government charges an individual with violating a statute enacted to protect public health, safety, morals, or welfare fall under
Criminal law cases are when the government charges an individual with violating a statute enacted to protect public health, safety, morals, or welfare fall under.
government . noun. the exercise of political authority over the movements, affairs, and so on, of a political unit, human beings, and so forth, in addition to the overall performance of sure capabilities for this unit or frame; the action of governing; political rule and administration. a central authority is the system to govern a state or community.
The Columbia Encyclopedia defines authorities as "a device of social control beneath which the right to make legal guidelines, and the proper to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society". a government is an institution via which leaders exercising electricity to make and enforce legal guidelines. a central authority's simple capabilities are imparting management, retaining order, providing public offerings, providing country wide security, imparting financial security, and imparting monetary assistance.
Learn more about government here: https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
the party whips assist which person(s)? responses the president the president the military in drafting men the military in drafting men judges during legal hearings judges during legal hearings the party floor leaders during voting the party floor leaders during voting
The party whips assist the party whips assist which person.
On the House Floor, the Democratic Whip supports the Democratic leadership in overseeing the party's legislative agenda. The Whip gives the Democratic Members a communications network and organizes them for significant party proposals that are up for a vote. The phrase "party whips" is a term used in the House of Commons of Great Britain, where they have existed since the late 18th century. The name was taken by the British Parliament from foxhunting, when the person in charge of keeping the pack of foxhounds together was known as the "whipper in." Whips have acted as a two-way link between the leadership and the rank-and-file in the U.S. House.
Whips, who traditionally act as assistant leaders, are primarily in charge of tallying votes and gathering party members for quorum calls. On occasion, they also fill in for the majority or minority leaders when they are not present.
To know more about party whips refer:
https://brainly.com/question/18866400
#SPJ4
true or false: according to sutherland, the offense element relates to crimes in which the rich and powerful use their occupational positions to accrue more wealth and power
It is true that according to Sutherland, the offense element relates to crimes in which the rich and powerful use their occupational positions to accrue more wealth and power.
About Sutherland
George Alexander Sutherland was an American politician and lawyer who was born in England (March 25, 1862–July 18, 1942). Between 1922 through 1938, he worked as such an associate justice on the US Supreme Court. He additionally served as Utah's representative in both chambers of Congress as a Republican.
Sutherland, who was born in England's Buckinghamshire, relocated towards the Utah Territory with his family in the 1860s. Sutherland opened a law office in Provo, Utah after graduating from the University of Michigan Law School, and he was elected to the Utah State Senate. Sutherland was elected to the US Senate in 1905 as well as the US House of Representatives in 1900. Sutherland supported a number of progressive initiatives while serving in Congress, although he mainly favoured the party's conservative edge.
To know more about Sutherland:
brainly.com/question/5987286
#SPJ4
