Answer:
A. *politics for the "common man."
What was the importance of the Jacksonian democracy?The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.
The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’
Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’
From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.
Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.
Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.
Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.
Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-
Suffrage/Voting rights
Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.
Manifest Destiny
Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.
In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.
1. After reading the topics, summarize some of the reasons that global migrations occurred in the
1750-1900 time period:
2. How do you think industrialization played a role in increased migrations in this time period?
3. How did environmental factors play a role in increased migrations in this time period?
4. How do you think global capitalism played a role in increased migrations during this time period?
Answer:
1. Global migrations occurred in the 1750-1900 time period due to various reasons such as economic opportunities, religious persecution, political instability, wars, and natural disasters.
2. Industrialization played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. As industrialization led to the growth of factories and manufacturing industries, there was a need for more labor. This led to the migration of people from rural areas to urban centers in search of work.
3. Environmental factors such as droughts, floods, famines, and other natural disasters also played a role in increased migrations during this time period. These environmental factors often led to crop failures and food shortages, which forced people to migrate to other areas in search of food and better living conditions.
4. Global capitalism also played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. The growth of capitalist economies and the search for new markets and resources led to colonization and imperialism. This, in turn, led to the forced migration of people from colonized territories to other parts of the world as laborers or slaves. Additionally, the growth of international trade and commerce led to the migration of skilled laborers and entrepreneurs in search of economic opportunities in other countries.
After other smaller German states had instituted liberal reforms in their territories, a confrontation occurred between revolutionaries and the Prussian army in Berlin. As a result, King Frederick William of Prussia
After other smaller German states had instituted liberal reforms in their territories, a confrontation occurred between revolutionaries and the Prussian army in Berlin.
As a result, King Frederick William IV of Prussia, who had initially promised to support the liberal cause, ultimately rejected the demands of the revolutionaries and instead implemented more conservative policies.
The confrontation in Berlin took place in March 1848, when a group of revolutionaries demanded that the king grant civil liberties, including freedom of the press and the right to assemble. The king initially agreed to these demands, but as the situation became more volatile, he changed his stance and began to crack down on the revolutionaries. The Prussian army was called in to restore order, and a number of people were killed or injured in the ensuing conflict.
After the confrontation, Frederick William IV issued a new constitution that was more conservative than the one demanded by the revolutionaries. The new constitution granted some civil liberties, but also strengthened the power of the monarchy and restricted the ability of the people to participate in government. This marked the end of the liberal reforms that had been sweeping through Europe in the wake of the French Revolution and the beginning of a period of conservatism and reaction that would last for several decades.
To know more about liberal reforms here
https://brainly.com/question/471976
#SPJ4
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
[06.05 MC]
Excerpt taken from The Historic Rise of Old Hickory by Suzanne B. Williams
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, but he did not win it in each state. Jackson and Adams both won many electoral votes. Jackson won the most with 99. However, a candidate needs an absolute majority of electoral votes to win. In 1824, Jackson needed 131 to win. When there is not majority winner, the election goes to the House of Representatives. This has only happened twice in U.S. history.
Even though he won the popular vote and many electoral votes, Andrew Jackson lost the presidency in 1824. John Quincy Adams was the Secretary of State at this time. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, receiving the least, was left out. However, as a leader in the House of Representatives, he had influence over the other members. Clay openly hated Jackson and there were rumors that Clay made a deal with Adams in exchange for his support. The House election declared John Quincy Adams president. Soon, he chose Henry Clay to fill the seat he left vacant, Secretary of State. Jackson was shocked and enraged. Although there was no inquiry of possible wrongdoing, Jackson accused Adams and Clay of making a "corrupt bargain."
John Quincy Adams was a disappointment as president. Many of his goals created divisions like federal funds for internal improvement. Some states thought that taking federal funds would force them to follow certain rules. They felt this reduced their rights as independent states. Jackson took advantage of issues like this one to gather more support. More Jackson supporters found their way to seats in Congress. He was as a man of the people and said Adams could never understand the common man’s concerns.
John Quincy Adams ran against Andrew Jackson in the 1828 election. Personal attacks grew even more vicious, but Andrew Jackson appealed to many. He believed government was for the common man. He believed in strict reading of the law and limited internal improvements. He also believed in states’ rights.
Andrew Jackson easily won the 1828 election, winning both the popular vote and a majority of electoral votes. Historians note the sectional nature of the voting. Support for Jackson was concentrated in South while Adams’ support was mostly in the North. Jackson was so popular because he brought changes to the government. He also wanted to make sure the government was responsible for its actions. Jackson pushed settlement into the frontier. He supported the Indian Removal act. He also defended the spread of slavery. Though his support was heavier in the South, he was determined to keep a unified nation. The rise and presidency of Old Hickory is memorable to Americans today.
Which statement makes a true comparison of the 1824 and 1828 elections?
The losers in 1824 were the main candidates for president in 1828.
Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828.
Candidates were more divided on the issues in 1828 than in 1824.
More people voted in the election of 1824 than they did in 1828.
The true comparison can be seen in the sentence "Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828."
What was the great impact that the elections of 1824 and 1828 had?They reinforced the population's need to choose their political leaders.Strengthened the two-party system.He highlighted the political differences between the south and north of the country.In 1824 the country realized how influential sectional divisions were in national politics. This caused many politicians and parties to establish strategies that ensured greater relevance in parts of the country. This became even more relevant and strong in 1828.
Learn more about the sectional divisions between the 1824 and 1828 elections:
https://brainly.com/question/2117462
#SPJ1
What does building socialism mean
The Shocking Cynicism Behind the Voyage of the “St. Louis” and Its Ship Full of Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany
What is the author referring to when he says, “And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?”
What is the “shocking cynicism” that the author refers to in the title of the article?
Answer:
\ The author is referring to the belief held by some in the US government at the time that Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany were not a priority and that it was more important to focus on admitting refugees who were deemed politically favorable, such as those who were anti-Nazi or potential allies in the war effort. The author suggests that this attitude led to a lack of action on the part of the US government to help the Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis, and instead they were turned away and sent back to Europe.
Explanation:
dr kings tome and style contrast with the kinds of political speech we most often hear today. why do you think that is and what does it say about his contect and ourds
Dr. King's speeches were unique in that they were rooted in strong moral values, emphasized the importance of unity, and advocated for nonviolent civil disobedience. His approach stands in stark contrast to the divisive and often partisan language used in modern political discourse. This speaks to the timelessness of Dr. King's message and the continued relevance of his work today.
Dr. King's tone and style contrast with the types of political speech we mostly hear today. Why do you think that is, and what does it say about his context and ours?Dr. King's tone and style differ from the types of political speeches we hear today because his speeches have a more profound and meaningful approach. Dr. King's speeches focused on the human experience rather than the politics of it. The context in which Dr. King gave his speeches was quite different from the context in which political speeches are given today. Dr. King was focused on ensuring civil rights for all individuals, regardless of race, and he used his speeches to inspire and motivate people to work together to achieve this goal.Dr. King's speeches are seen as classic and memorable, and his words still inspire people today. The current political speeches have a negative and partisan approach, which only serves to widen the gap between different groups of people. The current political speeches often lack empathy, and it only highlights the divisive nature of the politics today. It says that Dr. King believed in unity and bringing people together, and he wanted everyone to be treated equally. It says that our current society needs to focus more on inclusivity and empathy, rather than being negative and divisive. Dr. King believed that everyone has the right to be heard and to live in a world that is just and equal, and his speeches have played a significant role in bringing positive change.
For more such questions on civil disobedience
https://brainly.com/question/8144430
#SPJ11
How did the Industrial Revolution affect family life in the North? Responses It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of living. It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of living. It largely ended the practice of families working together in the same business. It largely ended the practice of families working together in the same business. It led to increased access to healthcare. It led to increased access to healthcare. It caused the influence of the father on the children to increase.
The Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on family life in the North
It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of livingHow the Industrial Revolution affect family life in the NorthHigher wages and a higher standard of living: The Industrial Revolution created new job opportunities in factories, mines, and mills. This led to higher wages for many workers and improved their living standards. With more money, families could afford better food, clothing, and housing.
End of the family business: Before the Industrial Revolution, many families worked together in cottage industries, such as weaving, spinning, or shoemaking. However, as factories emerged, the practice of families working together declined. Instead, family members often worked in different factories, which meant less time spent together.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution at:
https://brainly.com/question/546336
#SPJ1
as described in the passage, the pattern of economic development in russia in the nineteenth century differed most strongly from which other pattern of economic development during the same period? responses the emergence of resource export economies, such as those in colonial south asia the emergence of resource export economies, such as those in colonial south asia the expansion of transnational businesses, such as global banking and insurance companies the expansion of transnational businesses, such as global banking and insurance companies the implementation of economic policies to promote industrialization, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in egypt the implementation of economic policies to promote industrialization, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in egypt the transition from preindustrial to industrial production through the actions of private entrepreneurs or companies
The pattern of economic development in Russia in the nineteenth century differed most strongly from the transition from preindustrial to industrial production through the actions of private entrepreneurs or companies, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in Egypt.
About RussiaRussia, country that stretches over a vast expanse of eastern Europe and northern Asia. Once the preeminent republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.; commonly known as the Soviet Union), Russia became an independent country after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991.
Russia is a land of superlatives. By far the world’s largest country, it covers nearly twice the territory of Canada, the second largest. It extends across the whole of northern Asia and the eastern third of Europe, spanning 11 time zones and incorporating a great range of environments and landforms, from deserts to semiarid steppes to deep forests and Arctic tundra.
Russia contains Europe’s longest river, the Volga, and its largest lake, Ladoga. Russia also is home to the world’s deepest lake, Baikal, and the country recorded the world’s lowest temperature outside the North and South poles.
Learn more about Russia at
https://brainly.com/question/17907644
#SPJ11
The policy of appeasement made Hitler stop his attacks and avoided war.
after the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black americans from voting.
After the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting.
After the Civil War, the Southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications, and this permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting. This period was known as the Jim Crow era, which began in 1877 and lasted until the mid-1960s.
It was a time when many African Americans were barred from voting due to laws and regulations that aimed to prevent them from doing so.
These laws and regulations included literacy tests, poll taxes, and property ownership requirements, all of which made it difficult, if not impossible, for many African Americans to vote.
In some cases, even African Americans who met the qualifications required by law were denied the right to vote due to poll taxes, intimidation, or outright fraud. As a result, many black Americans were effectively excluded from the political process for many years.
To know more about civil war refer here
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
who were the first group of people targeted by huac? doctors government workers screenwriters and actors
The first group of people targeted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) were screenwriters and actors.
What was the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)?The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was a congressional committee established in 1938 to investigate individuals and organizations with alleged ties to communism. It became more active in the 1940s and 1950s, with a focus on investigating alleged communist influence in the film industry, universities, and government agencies.
Several prominent figures in the entertainment industry, including screenwriters and actors, were called to testify before the committee and were blacklisted for their political views. This led to many people losing their jobs and facing significant personal and professional consequences.
Therefore, the correct answer is: ''Screenwriters and actors.''
See more about HUAC at https://brainly.com/question/1130666.
#SPJ11
The clause iS vague but gives the national government responsibilities_ very broad grant of power t0 carry out it$ enumerated powers full faith and credit supremacy necessary and proper
The Clause you are referring to is the Necessary and Proper Clause, which is part of Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." In other words, this clause grants Congress broad power to make laws necessary to carry out its other powers. The clause is vague but gives the national government responsibilities very broad grant of power to carry out its enumerated powers full faith and credit supremacy necessary and proper is referring to the Elastic Clause
.What is the Elastic Clause?The Elastic Clause refers to a clause in the United States Constitution's Article I, Section 8. It is also called the "Necessary and Proper Clause." The Elastic Clause specifies that Congress has the power to make any legislation that is necessary and proper to carry out the duties of the United States Government.According to the Constitution, the national government has been given limited powers. However, the Elastic Clause allows the government to extend its authority when required. It is known as the Elastic Clause because it allows the government to stretch its powers as and when required. In conclusion, the clause mentioned in the question is referring to the Elastic Clause that provides the national government with broad power to carry out its enumerated powers.
For more such questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/23497087
#SPJ11
In 1492, Columbus arrived in North America. What century was that?the 2ndthe 13ththe 14ththe 15th
15th
Because the 15th century of the world was from January 1401 (MCDI) to 31 December 1500 (MD)
An Italian trader bought merchandise in China and now wants to return home with it. However, he doesn't want to return via the Silk Road. Choose all the spots on the route he can take to reach Italy
Sea route: The trader can send his product from a Chinese Italian port through sea. This route passes across the Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the South China Sea. Depending on reach
A trader is a person or organisation that participates in the profitable purchase and sale of financial products like stocks, bonds, commodities, or currencies. Traders can either work for a financial organisation or for themselves, trading their own funds. To evaluate market trends, choose whether to purchase or sell, and control risk, they employ a variety of tactics. In order to help them make decisions, traders may specialise on a certain kind of financial instrument or market, such as stocks or foreign currency, and employ cutting-edge tools and technology. Strong analytical abilities, a thorough awareness of market dynamics, and the
Learn more about trader here:
https://brainly.com/question/29733491
#SPJ4
Help! 50 points + Branliest!
Explain how the policy of appeasement leads to Hitler’s taking of the Sudentenland in Czechoslovakia and how this lead to the beginning of World War II. (200 Words)
Answer:
The policy of appeasement was the approach taken by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany in the years leading up to World War II. Instead of confronting Adolf Hitler's territorial ambitions in Europe, these nations sought to appease him by making concessions with the hope of avoiding war. This policy, however, ultimately failed and contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
One of the most notable examples of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which Britain and France allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. This was done without the consultation of the Czechoslovakian government and was an attempt to appease Hitler's territorial demands. The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, famously declared upon his return from Munich that he had achieved "peace for our time."
However, Hitler's occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 demonstrated the failure of the policy of appeasement. This aggression led to Britain and France realizing the futility of appeasement and declaring war on Germany on September 3, 1939, beginning World War II.
The policy of appeasement ultimately failed because it gave Hitler the impression that he could act aggressively and that the other European powers would not respond. It also allowed Hitler to re-arm Germany and consolidate his power without opposition. The failure of appeasement taught the world a valuable lesson that aggressive dictators cannot be appeased, and that the only way to stop them is to confront them directly.
b) explain one way in which the mass destruction of specific populations impacted societies after world war ii.
One way in which the mass destruction of specific populations impacted societies after World War II was by creating a demographic, environmental, psychological, and historical trauma, pain, fear, terror, and instability in people.
When a specific group of people is targeted for mass destruction, it can lead to the destruction of their social and cultural values. Which could include damage of their homes and their physical environment, and can take years or even decades to rebuild.
The consequences of violencePeople who experienced such violence and loss of their loved ones may suffer from PTSD and other psychological disorders. This can lead to behavioral changes, such as fear, anger, and even violence. The societal impact of mass destruction can be immense and long-lasting, often leading to generational trauma.
Learn more about World War II: https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
the changes in described in the excerpt most strongly support the argumen that in the late nineteenth century worker's ideas were evolving with regards to
The changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
What the author is saying in this excerpt is that the struggle for the eight-hour workday was not just about that specific issue, but was part of a broader movement for workers' rights and recognition. Workers were beginning to realize that they had power in numbers, and that by joining together and fighting for their rights they could achieve greater equality and respect in society.Therefore, the changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
For more such questions on late nineteenth century
https://brainly.com/question/11579840
#SPJ11
Early on, Hitler joined the
Answer:
Deutsche Arbeiterpartei aka German Workers' Party
I think thats what your answer should be
Explanation:
Adolf Hitler's rise to power began in the newly established Weimar Republic in September 1919 when Hitler joined the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (DAP; German Workers' Party). He rose to a place of prominence in the early years of the party.
briefly explain one example of how religion and science were a source of conflict in american society during the 1920s. b) briefly explain one development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition. c) briefly explain one important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods.
a) The conflict between religion and science in American society during the 1920s can be exemplified by the Scopes Monkey Trial. The trial was a court case held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, where a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The case became a national spectacle and pitted proponents of evolution against those who believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Although Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, the trial brought the issue of evolution to the forefront of American public discourse and highlighted the tensions between science and religion.
b) One development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition was the rise of organized crime. Prohibition, which banned the sale and consumption of alcohol, was enacted in 1919 with the ratification of the 18th Amendment. However, the law was widely flouted, and many people continued to drink and buy alcohol illegally. Organized crime syndicates, such as the mafia, saw an opportunity to profit from the demand for alcohol and began to smuggle and sell it on a large scale. This led to an increase in violence and corruption, and many Americans began to view prohibition as a failure.
c) An important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods was the introduction of quotas. The Immigration Act of 1924 established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from each country. The quotas were based on the percentage of each nationality that was already present in the United States in 1890, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and restricted those from Southern and Eastern Europe. This marked a departure from earlier policies that had favored open immigration and reflected a growing nativist sentiment in American society.
For more such questions on American society
https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ11
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was
a. agriculture
b. glassmaking
c. metalworking
d. pottery
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was A) agriculture.
The Roman Empire's economy was fueled by agriculture, and it was the foundation of the empire's wealth. The Roman economy was primarily based on A) agriculture, as was the case in most ancient civilizations. Rome's prosperity was founded on its agricultural resources, which were significant because they offered food for the populace and contributed to the empire's wealth.
Agriculture was the primary source of income for the Roman Empire. It was the foundation of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. Romans were well-known for their skills in constructing an irrigation system to transport water throughout the arid land.
In the Roman Empire, there was a lot of land that was perfect for agriculture. They produced crops such as wheat, corn, and barley, and livestock such as cattle, goats, and sheep. The majority of the crops were utilized to feed the Roman population, with a small percentage being exported to other nations.
The wealth that Rome generated from agriculture was used to fund its military campaigns, construct public buildings, and maintain public works like aqueducts and roads. Agriculture was the primary source of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. As a result, it is safe to say that Rome's agricultural sector was the backbone of its economy, and without it, the empire would not have been able to achieve such a high degree of wealth and success.
For similar questions on "Agriculture" :
https://brainly.com/question/3161950
#SPJ11
identify the statements that describe the marbury v. madison decision and its significance.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803, was the legal decision that established the use of judicial review. In that case, the Supreme Court found that Congress's Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court established the principle that it has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and so null and void.
who is the youngest person to win an academy award
The youngest person to ever win an Academy Award is Tatum O'Neal.
She won the award for Best Supporting Actress in 1974 at the age of 10 for her role in the film "Paper Moon". O'Neal played the role of Addie Loggins, a young girl who travels with a con artist pretending to be her father. The film was directed by Peter Bogdanovich and also starred Ryan O'Neal, Tatum's real-life father. O'Neal's win was a historic moment for the Academy Awards, and she remains the youngest person ever to receive an Oscar. Despite her early success, O'Neal faced personal struggles in her life and career, but her achievement as a young actress in Hollywood remains a significant milestone in film history.
To learn more about Academy Award refer to:
brainly.com/question/15096407
#SPJ4
Entries Write three journal entries as if you were living during the Great Depression. Each entry must be 3 full paragraphs and be sure to include the emotions the people were feeling talk about how people live during the dust bowl and stuff like that.
Answer:
Journal Entry 1: October 29, 1929
Today was a day that will go down in history. The stock market crashed and with it, all of our hopes and dreams for a prosperous future. The news spread like wildfire and panic set in. The value of stocks and bonds plummeted, and many people lost everything they had invested. My family and I were fortunate enough to not have invested in the market, but we still feel the effects of the crash. People are losing their jobs left and right and businesses are closing their doors. It's hard to imagine how we will survive this economic catastrophe.
To make matters worse, we are also living through the dust bowl. The skies are constantly dark with dust and the wind is relentless. The dust gets in everything - our clothes, our food, our lungs. It's hard to breathe and even harder to work. Farmers are struggling to grow crops and many are forced to abandon their farms. My family is lucky to have a small plot of land where we can grow some of our own food, but it's not enough to sustain us. We're doing our best to stay strong and hopeful, but it's becoming harder and harder every day.
Journal Entry 2: May 15, 1932
It's been three years since the stock market crash and things have only gotten worse. The country is in the grips of the Great Depression and it feels like there is no end in sight. Unemployment rates are at an all-time high and people are struggling to make ends meet. I've seen people begging on the streets and standing in long lines for soup kitchens. It's heart-wrenching to see the desperation in their eyes.
The dust bowl is still raging on and it's taking a toll on everyone. The soil is so dry and brittle that it's almost impossible to grow anything. We've had to resort to eating things we never thought we would, like cactus and tumbleweeds. The dust storms are getting worse and it feels like we're constantly fighting a losing battle against nature. But we're determined to survive. We're doing everything we can to keep our heads above water and help our neighbors do the same. It's a tough road, but we're not giving up.
Journal Entry 3: December 7, 1941
Today, our country was attacked by the Japanese. It's a day that will live in infamy. It's hard to believe that things could get any worse, but they have. The war has plunged us deeper into the Great Depression, as resources are diverted to the war effort. Rationing is now a way of life and everything from food to gasoline is in short supply. It's a struggle to make do with what we have, but we're making it work.
The dust bowl seems like a distant memory now, but we still bear the scars. The land is slowly recovering, but it will never be the same. We've learned to adapt to the changing conditions and to appreciate the little things in life. We've come a long way since the stock market crash of 1929, but we still have a long way to go. The future is uncertain, but we're hopeful that we can build a better world for ourselves and for future generations.
The three journal entries of the Great Depression period are given below:
The Journal EntriesJournal Entry 1: August 1, 1932
Today, I woke up feeling heavy-hearted. It's been years since the stock market crashed and the Great Depression began, but it seems like things keep getting worse. My family and I have been struggling to make ends meet. We've had to cut back on everything, and some days, we don't even have enough to eat. We've had to make do with what we have, and that's not much. The dust bowl hasn't helped things either. Every day, it seems like the dust gets worse. It's hard to breathe, and it's even harder to grow crops. Many farmers have lost everything. I can't help but feel hopeless sometimes, but I try to stay positive. I know that we'll get through this somehow. We have to.
Journal Entry 2: October 10, 1934
Things are getting worse. The dust storms are relentless. They come in waves, one after another, suffocating us and destroying what little we have left. It's hard to imagine life without them. The dust has taken over everything, and it's hard to remember what the world looked like before. The economy is still struggling too. Jobs are scarce, and even when you can find work, the pay is barely enough to survive. My family and I have had to move from place to place, searching for any kind of stability. It's a hard life, but we're not alone. Everyone is in the same boat. We all share the same struggles, the same fears, and the same hopes. We try to help each other out when we can, but there's only so much we can do. We're all just trying to make it through the day.
Journal Entry 3: May 5, 1938
It's been almost a decade since the Great Depression began, and things are finally starting to look up. The dust bowl has mostly passed, and the economy is slowly starting to recover. Jobs are starting to become available again, and people are beginning to feel hopeful about the future. My family and I have managed to hold on through the tough times, and we're starting to see some rewards for our perseverance. We've learned to be resourceful, to make do with what we have, and to be grateful for the little things. The Great Depression has taught us many lessons, and I hope that we don't forget them when times get better. I know that we still have a long way to go, but I feel hopeful that we'll get there. We've come a long way, and we can't give up now.
Read more about the Great Depression here:
https://brainly.com/question/441267
#SPJ1
the compromise of 1850 removed the slavery question from congressional debate. yet, the new fugitive slave act made further controversy inevitable. which of the following provisions of the fugitive slave act proved controversial?
Federal commissions now decided the fate of fugitive slaves who have been arrested in the North, independent of state and local regulations.
Which were the main tenets of the 1850 Compromise?The laws set a boundary with Tex and the The Us, abolished the slave market in Washington, DC, that revised this same Fugitive Slave Act in addition to calling for the entrance of California as just a "free state" and territory governments for both New Mexico and Utah.
Why did Wilmot object to slavery being introduced to the new lands?Wilmot opposed the expansion of slavery into in the Mexican Cession and not just because he cared about African Americans but rather because he thought that slavery was bad for white labor and that lands should not be ceded to slaves. The government should use its newly acquired resources to strengthen the situation of white seasonal workers and small farms.
To know more about fugitive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31036916
#SPJ1
on march 3, 1918, what treaty did russia sign with germany and the central powers ending their involvement in world war 1?
Answer:
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (also known as the Treaty of Brest in Russia) was a separate peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between Russia and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire), that ended Russia's participation in World War I.
Explanation: I really hope this helps!! Mark me brainliest!!
Have a good evening!! :))
After the fall of France in 1940, what was the only nation left fighting Germany?
Soviet Union
Great Britain
United States
Italy
Switzerland
Answer:
Explanation:
Great Britain was the only nation left fighting Germany after the fall of France in 1940.
as demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
The documentation of events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising allowed for the dissemination of information that may have been suppressed or distorted by traditional media outlets (option A).
Social media and citizen journalists provided real-time updates and footage of the protests, allowing for a global audience to witness the events as they unfolded. This helped to galvanize international support for the protesters and put pressure on the Ukrainian government to address their grievances. Additionally, the documentation of police brutality and human rights violations helped to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Overall, the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising include increased transparency, accountability, and support for social and political change.
Option A is the correct answer.
"
Complete quesion
As demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A- The documentation of events on a grassroots level.
B- The hindrance of events.
"
You can learn more about Ukraine uprising at
https://brainly.com/question/26824054
#SPJ11
How might your life be different had George iii accepted the olive branch petition
Explanation:
Britain's King George III, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written by John Dickinson, appealed directly to the king and expressed hope for reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain.
Relevance of understanding the philippine poetry and prose during the spanish colonial period
Understanding Philippine poetry and prose during the Spanish colonial period is important because it provides insight into the country's cultural and historical identity.
Literature during this period reflects the struggles and resistance of Filipinos against Spanish colonization, as well as their attempts to preserve their own cultural traditions and values. It also shows how Philippine literature was shaped by Spanish influence and how it evolved over time. Moreover, it highlights the role of literature in shaping the Filipino consciousness and in promoting nationalism and social awareness. By studying Philippine literature during the Spanish colonial period, we gain a better understanding of our cultural heritage and the ongoing struggle for social and political liberation.
To know more about Spanish colonial period click here:
brainly.com/question/4488404
#SPJ4
What is the best definition of a "city-
state?"
A. The capital of a kingdom.
B. A palatial complex of buildings that housed a
monarch.
C. An independent, self-governing territory.
city-state, a political device consisting of an unbiased town having sovereignty over contiguous territory and serving as a centre and chief of political, economic, and cultural life.
What is the dictionary definition of city-state?city-state. noun. a kingdom consisting of a sovereign town and its dependencies. Among the most famous are the terrific impartial cities of the historic world, such as Athens, Sparta, Carthage, Thebes, Corinth, and Rome.
A city-state is an independent, self-governing united states contained completely inside the borders of a single city. The ancient empires of Rome, Carthage, Athens, and Sparta are regarded early examples of city-states.
Learn more about city-state here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500968#SPJ1