Discuss the difference between foriegn policy and domestic policy
Answer:
Domestic policies are those that affect or apply to people or institutions within a particular country and tend to be internal. Foreign policy has to do with policies between two or more nations and is external. It focuses on building networks with other countries.
Many New Orleans officers responding to crime in the wake of Hurricane Katrina wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges. Which nineteenth-century organization was among the first to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms with its three-quarter-length royal blue coats, white trousers, and top hats?
Answer:
The first London Metropolitan Police
Explanation:
On the 29th of August, 2005, New Orleans was hit with a fatal natural disaster, which was called Hurricane Katrina and it resulted in the widespread destruction of properties through flooding and storm.
During the Hurricane Katrina, many police officers serving in New Orleans wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges while responding to criminal activities.
The first London Metropolitan Police was established by Robert Peel in 1829, under the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829.
The first London Metropolitan Police is a nineteenth-century organization and it is considered to be among the first paramilitary unit to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms.
Additionally, the first London Metropolitan Police wore royal blue coats of three-quarter-length, white trousers, and top hats to match.
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
what role correctional officials have to play in offenders life?
Answer:
The Correctional Official is the single most important person who mediates between an offender and society. The Official is expected to be a good role model for others in her or his presence. It is this official who holds the power over an offender's head. S/he can use this power to humiliate, and degrade the offender
a learning style through which a skill is acquired when a student learns through experience is called
Ways to avoid emotional stress when
driving include:
a Always have the radio off
b Obey the rules-of-the-road
c Never change lanes
d Always go
with the flow
Answer:
I will go with D always go with the flow
g Which type of case would be appealed automatically to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Group of answer choices A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence A state jail (fourth-degree) felony conviction A first-degree felony conviction A civil case involving a sum of over $100,000
Answer:
A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence.
Explanation:
The Texas Court of the Criminal Appeals is the last and the highest court of appeal incase of any criminal matters. It is situated in the Supreme court building with the Presiding judge. The court exercises a discretionary review over the criminal cases.
The only cases the Court must hear are only those cases that involves the sentence of a capital punishment or a denial of a bail. A capital felony of conviction which imposed a death sentence to the accused can be automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Qualifications for Jury Service
• Never have been convicted of a felony
• Not be currently on active duty in the military
• Not be already serving on another jury
• Be able to read and write in English
. ?
Which other qualification must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a
jury?
A. Be at least 18 years old
B. Have completed military service
C. Not be enrolled in college
There are several qualifications for a citizen to be able to serve in a jury and one of them is that they should A. Be at least 18 years old.
What are the requirements to serve on a jury?Only people who are aged 18 and above can serve in a jury because they are considered to be more mentally mature.
The person also has to be able to read and write in English and should have a clean record.
#SPJ5
Find out more on jury duty at https://brainly.com/question/5137364.
A. Be at least 18 years old
mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại tròn xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật đúng hay sai? Giải thích
Answer:
Sai lầm
Explanation:
Mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại trong xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật.
Sai. Các quan hệ xã hội của chúng ta được điều chỉnh bơi các quy phạm đao đức và các quy phạm pháp luật, mà các quy phạm đạo đức thì có thể đượec thể chế hóa và đưa lên thành các quy phạm pháp luật nhưng không phải quy phạm đạo đức nào cũng được dưa lên thành luật cả. Tồn tại xã hội quyết định ý thức xã hội cho nên các quy tắc ứng xử đựoc coi là các chuẩn mực đạo đứa đó đó không nhất thiết phải được xem là pháp luật mà nó song song tồn tại trong xã hội
Which of the following is not an instruction that would be given to witnesses to prepare them for trial?
If asked to give exact times or measurements, "approximate" your responses.
It is best to elaborate and give detailed answers to questions.
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand.
Always tell the truth and testify with confidence.
Answer:
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand
Explanation:
Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.
What is the first step when investigating an arson?
Photograph the scene of the fire.
Question witnesses who observed the fire burning.
Identify the "plant"—the material used to set the fire.
Identify the point of origin of the fire.
Answer:
identify the plant - the material that used to set the fire
Are foreign policy and domestic policy two faces of the same coin.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcohol and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Answer:
Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light
The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because the driver was not in custody for Miranda purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.
Explanation:
The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening. At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication. The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed. Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.
Can an impaired driver crash into you or someone you love? Yes or no
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
A plaintiff sues her employer for sexual harassment. During the trial, the plaintiff attempts to introduce into evidence company records that include written complaints from other employees alleging that they too were sexually harassed by the employer. The defense objects to the admission of the records on the basis of hearsay. Should the objection be sustained?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The evidence is most likely valid and can be useful so the judge shouldn't Sustain it.
No, Hearsay rule is the rule prohibiting hearsay (out of court statements offered as proof of that statement) from being admitted as evidence because of the inability of the other party to cross-examine the maker of the statement.
What is considered hearsay evidence?Hearsay evidence is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Why hearsay is admissible?The hearsay rule does not exclude the evidence if it is an operative fact. Language of commercial offer and acceptance is also admissible over a hearsay exception because the statements have independent legal significance. Double hearsay is a hearsay statement that contains another hearsay statement itself.
To learn more about Hearsay rule, refer
https://brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ2
civil cases cannot be tried by what?
A judge
A judge and jury
Third party arbitrator
An arbitrator not agreed upon
In a civil trial, a judge or jury examines the evidence to decide whether, by a "preponderance of the evidence," the defendant should be held legally responsible for the damages alleged by the plaintiff.
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
QUESTION 18
Indicate the correct statement:
(1) An ex parte application is the motion application used when there is no dispute of facts
(2) Action proceedings is another type of motion application and the procedure is started by a
notice of motion
(3) In criminal cases a procedure is started with action proceedings
(4) The parties in a criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant
Answer:
2 or 4 is correct
Explanation:
step by step explanation
The correct statement in the given question is (4) statement.
Statement (1) - Ex Parte Application
Ex parte application is used in civil procedure and is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for the response from the other side.
These orders are only in place until further hearing can be held such as temporary restraining order .
Under U.S.A law , court are hesitant to make ex parte motion because according to 5th amendment and 14th amendment, there is a guarantee of right to due process and ex parte leads to the violation of excluded party's right to due process.
Statement (2)- Action Proceedings
Action Proceedings refers to a judicial proceedings where a party brings a civil or criminal case against another party, an action has been brought against the other party.
It is not a type of motion application and is used in cases such as:
- presence of material disputes in facts
- it is instituted by summons
- evidence to be relied upon in supporting the claim and is not disclosed in the statement
- exchange of pleadings are involved
-evidence in the form of testimonies and documentary is given to prove the claims
- more expensive and time consuming
Statement (3)- Arrest
In criminal cases a procedure is started with Arrest.
An arrest is made with an arrest warrant and may be made with or without warrant if probable cause and exigent circumstances are presented at the time of Arrest.
The right to make warrantless arrests are commonly defined and limited by statutes subject to due process guaranteed by U.S.A Constitution.
Statement (4)- Prosecutor and Defendant
These both terms are related strictly to Criminal Law.
Prosecutor- Legal representative of the prosecution in the states with the criminal law system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law.
A lawyer who initiates prosecution of criminal offences and present s the case for prosecution in a criminal proceedings
Defendant- Defendant is a person who is the party either accused of committing a crime or criminal prosecution
Thus the parties in criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant.
To learn more about Prosecution and Defendant here
https://brainly.com/question/11980088
#SPJ3
You must submit a report to the DMV within 15 days of a traffic accident on a Traffic accident report form. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Quizlet - Unit 6 Lesson 3: Procedures When Involved In An Accident
First question.
Capacity and authority are two important concepts with regards to the normal day to day functioning of a company. With the aid of authoritative text, critically discuss the form and substance of these concepts.
Capacity occurs in the form of abilities whereas authority occurs in the form of power.
Capacity refers to the ability of a person to use the given information for making a decision. A person that lacks capacity it means that its mind is impaired and he is unable to make a decision at that time while on the other hand, authority is the legitimate power that a person or a group of persons possess and use it over other people. In capacity, the person has something in the form of abilities whereas in authority, the person has something in the form of power which they used to implement its decision over other people.
https://brainly.com/question/24353112
How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train
Can somebody help me
How Can We Get Khula in Pakistan?
http://www.advocateinlahore.com/khula-procedure-in-pakistan/
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish
Explanation:
Which of the following parties is permitted to view all entries in the Notary Signing Agent Notary journal?
A) Contracting Companies and Lenders
B) Borrowers and signing Parties
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Answer:
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Explanation:
Kathy receives her real estate license. Within a month of receiving her license, she gets a new job offer she can’t refuse. She decides to continue to hold a license but not practice or do any real estate work or collect any referrals at this time. She is willing to renew her license, do her continuing education, and pay the same fee for her license. What should Kathy do?
Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Answer: Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Explanation:
You are indeed right that she should seek an Involuntary Inactive license which is shows that she is not practicing and therefore has not met the requirements needed for her to continue practicing real estate work.
She might be ready to renew her license but the requirements are such that she would have to do some real estate work. If and ever she is willing to come back to real estate, she can then renew her license, pay the fee and meet other requirements.
an agreement enforceable by law is called as
Answer:
Contract
Explanation:
an agreement enforceable by the court of law is called as contract
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
What is Legal Process of Khula in Pakistan
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed
Explanation:
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
what is the role of police in protecting human right
Answer:
The police should protect the people without any discrimination as the law is equal for all.
The police must respect human dignity, uphold and protect human rights.
The police should ensure that the person detained should have access to their family and legal representative or any medical help
Explanation:
