This road sign means:
1: The road ahead turns sharply right then sharply left
2: Winding road ahead
3: A road joins from the left.
4: Sharp right turn
Answers
Answer:
4 sharp right turn
hope this helps
have a good day or night
The given road signs depicts Sharp right turn. So option D is correct among all given options.
What is road signs?Road signs, often known as traffic signs, are posted along the side of roadways or above them to inform and direct drivers. Simple wooden or stone milestones were the oldest types of signs. Later, directional signs with arms were developed, such as the fingerposts used in the United Kingdom and their wooden equivalents in Saxony.
Since the 1930s, as traffic volumes have increased, many nations have adopted pictorial signs or have similarly standardized and simplified their signs in an effort to overcome linguistic barriers and improve traffic safety.
Such pictorial signals are typically based on international norms and use symbols (often silhouettes) in place of words. These road signs were initially created in Europe and have since been adopted in varied degrees by the majority of nations.
Thus International agreements like the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals have aided in bringing traffic signs in different nations closer together. To minimize confusion, some nations have also (in part) unilaterally adopted policies from other nations.
Learn more about road sign:
https://brainly.com/question/28089398
#SPJ2
Related Questions
A homeowner sued a contractor in federal court for damages resulting from an unsuccessful roof repair. However, the homeowner failed to attend status conferences and failed generally to prosecute the action. As a result, the court dismissed the case with prejudice for want of prosecution. The homeowner then filed her complaint in a different federal court. In his answer the contractor asserts the affirmative defense of claim preclusion. Should the court dismiss the case
Answers
Answer: No, because a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is not on the merits.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, it should be noted that the case should not be dismissed by the court due to the fact that the dismissal is based on the lack of personal jurisdiction.
It should be noted that the claim preclusion should be added to the answer of the defendant as it's an affirmative defense and it requires more than the claimant bringing a case against the same defendant.
A judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case. In doing this, he is harkening back to a practice begun in which set of laws?
Answers
Answer: C. Common law
Explanation:
Since the judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case, then he is harkening back to a practice that was begun in a set of common laws.
Common law refers to a body of unwritten laws that was based on legal precedents that was established by the courts. It should be noted that common law influences the process of decision-making in cases whereby it's difficult to determine the outcome of the case based on the written rules of law.
A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives. While still in State A, the plaintiff's auto was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, a citizen of State B. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries and damage to his vehicle amounting to approximately $90,000. The plaintiff filed suit in the federal district court for State A and obtained proper service of process on the defendant. Under the laws of State A, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another vehicle in the rear is presumed to have acted negligently, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Neither the law of State B nor the federal statutes or case law has adopted such a rule. Should the court apply the presumption in question
Answers
Answer: Yes, because the presumption at issue operates upon elements of the prima facie case.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario illustrated in the question, the court should apply the presumption. It should be noted the federal court should be able to apply the state law where the court sits in a case that relates to the diversity of the citizenship under the Erie doctrine.
In this case, the court should apply the presumption in question because the presumption at issue operates upon elements of the prima facie case. It should be noted that the matters that has to do with prima facie case are substantive therefore state law should be applied to such scenarios.
The internet has been a particularly difficult problem for which of the following types of intellectual property?
(A) Trademarks
(B) Copyright
(C) Patents
(D) Designs
Answers
Alabama permit test
Answers
Answer:
Alabama is a state located on the south of the United States. With an area of 135,765 km2, Alabama is the 30th largest state in the United States, the 24th most populous state in terms of population (4.9 million) and 27th in terms of population density of 37 inhabitants per km2.
The territory of Alabama was explored by the Spaniards in the 16th century, the first permanent European settlement was founded by the French in 1702 (near today's city of Mobile). Until 1763, this coastal area was part of their Louisiana colony, then, until 1783, part of British West Florida. At that time, the territory of Alabama was divided by the United States and Spain (as part of Florida). In 1798, Mississippi territory was created in the United States, which by 1812 had spread to the entire territory of today's Mississippi and Alabama. Five years later, its own territory was separated, which subsequently became a US state. It got its name from the river of the same name, named after the Alabama Indian culture. On December 14, 1819, Alabama became the 22nd state of the United States. During the Civil War, Alabama was part of the Confederation from 1861 to 1865, and was rejoined the Union in 1868.
A drug addict gives his or her drug more importance than __________.
Answers
Answer:
Anything else
Explanation:
They will do any thing even give away family and being homeless.
The defendant is on trial for fraudulently signing a check for $10,000. The defendant has denied that she signed the check. The prosecutor calls the landlord of the apartment building in which the defendant has resided for three months before her arrest. The landlord intends to testify that it is the defendant's signature on the check, and he bases his opinion of the authenticity of her signature on the ground that he saw her sign the lease to his apartment. Should the trial court find this testimony admissible
Answers
Answer: Yes. because the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Explanation:
In this situation, the trial court should find this testimony admissible due to the fact that the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Since the landlord intends to testify based on the fact that he saw her sign thesame signature on the lease to his apartment, then this should be admissible by the court as it's an evidence to show that she was the one involved in the fraudulent signing of the check.
Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
-paying the electric bill in exchange for using electricity
-viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts
-observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
-paying the water bill in exchange for taking a shower
Answers
Answer:
c. observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
Explanation:
Viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts could be considered an acceptance of the social contract. Thus, option B is correct.
What is a social contract?A social contract is an unspoken arrangement of the obligations of the populace or the governing body. The agreement's conditions can change significantly.
One could argue that consuming news channel broadcasts in return for ads signify endorsement of the social contract. People must engage with each other in this condition of affairs, therefore citizens establish an agreement between themselves to govern this contact.
The social contract hypothesis is not only the oldest but also the most well-known of the explanations for how the state came into existence. The core of this thesis is that men without prior governmental organization agreed to a deal that led to the creation of the state.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about the social contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597938
#SPJ5
If a judge learns that a defendant was abused as a child and committed the crime while under extreme financial pressure, what is the most likely outcome?
Answers
what is political participation
Answers
Successful coping skills can be_______.
a) stress management
b) relaxation skills
c) both
d) neither
Answers
Answer:
A. & B. Both
both be a perfect answer for this blank questions
Which of the following is not a polling error?
using a push poll
using a random sample
using a biased sample
using a small polling sample
Answers
Using a random sample is Option (b), which is the right response.
What does a polling sampling error mean?This gives an indication of how accurate the survey's estimates are given the particular sample design. Only probability sampling can be used to evaluate sampling error. The inaccuracy that results from observing a sample rather than the entire population is known as the sampling error.
What is the survey's margin of error for random sampling?The margin of error is a statistic that describes how much random sampling error there is in survey results. One should have less faith that a poll's findings would accurately reflect those of a population census the higher the margin of error.
Learn more about sampling error: https://brainly.com/question/15521268
#SPJ9
What is the main difference between federal and confederal systems of government?
In a federal system there is no centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally
among the states.
In a federal system there is no centralized authority, while in a confederal system local offices give advice to a
centralized authority.
In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among
the states.
In a federal system power is distributed equally, while in a confederal system the states have less authority than
the central government.
Answers
Answer: In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states.
Explanation:
Some of the differences between a federal and a confederal include:
1. In the federal system, the main functions and power are reserved for the central government while for the confederal, main functions and power belongs to the states.
1. One of the differences between a federal and confederal is that a federation, sovereignty rests with a new state formed represented by the central government, while in a confederation, sovereignty rests with the component states.
2. The confederal system of government is less stable politically than the federal system of government.
3. In the federal system, the central government owns the police and army and.maintains them while in a confederation, each state maintains its own police and army.
4. In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states
5. In a confederation, citizens obey only their state government while in the federal system, the citizens obey two government which are the federal government and the state government.
Answer:
A. In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states.
Explanation:
The plaintiff was severely injured when a tire on her car blew out and caused her to lose control of the car. She filed an action in federal district court against the manufacturer of the tire, alleging that the tire was defective. The plaintiff intends to introduce remnants of the tire into evidence at trial as part of her proof that the tire was defective. In what way are the remnants subject to discovery
Answers
Answer:
Everything she uncovers through her Mechanic is Discovery and MUST be disclosed!
Which of the following is NOT considered exploitation?
Select one:
O a. Intimidating a elderly person to give them money.
O b. Deceptively convincing a senior to sell their home at below market price.
O c. Not responding quickly to a residents call button.
Answers
The following which is not considered as exploitation is Intimidating a elderly person to give them money Option(a) is correct.
What does Exploitation means?Exploitation is the demonstration of egotistically exploiting somebody or a gathering to benefit from them or in any case benefit oneself.
Exploitation is a thing type of the action word exploit, which ordinarily means to take advantage in such a manner. The modifier structure is manipulative, as in shady practices By a wide margin the most compelling hypothesis of exploitation at any point put forward is that of Karl Marx, who held that specialists in an entrepreneur society are taken advantage of to the extent that they are compelled to sell their work capacity to business people for not exactly the full worth of the products they produce with their work.
Overexploitation or overfishing is the evacuation of marine living assets to levels that are excessively low for supporting suitable populaces. At last, overexploitation can prompt asset consumption and put various compromised and imperiled species in danger of annihilation.
Therefore Option(a) is correct.
Learn more about Exploitation here:
brainly.com/question/15165384
#SPJ2
The driver of a car filed a civil action in federal district court against the owner and operator of a truck that collided with her vehicle. The driver has reason to believe that the truck was serviced at a particular auto repair shop shortly before the accident. The driver wants to see any records the repair shop has regarding the truck's servicing because a failure to properly service the truck could help prove the truck owner's liability. The driver requested the service records from the truck owner, but the truck owner has no service records in his possession. Can the driver obtain the truck's service records from the repair shop
Answers
Answer: Yes, by serving on the repair shop a subpoena requiring that the shop produce the documents for inspection
Explanation:
You didn't provide the options but I got the options online.
The driver can obtain the truck's service records from the repair shop by serving on the repair shop a subpoena requiring that the shop produce the documents for inspection.
A subpoena simply means a written order that is used to compel someone to give testimony regarding a subject usually before a court. For the request of documents from parties, a request for production will be used while the nonparties require subpoenas.
A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who was walking down a corridor lost his balance and bumped his head on the edge of a doorway. Because of a previously existing medical condition that made him susceptible to bleeding on the brain, he suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and permanent mental impairment, despite prompt medical attention on the ship. The passenger brought suit against the cruise ship owner for his damages. At trial, the passenger presented evidence of how he was injured as he walked down the hallway, his previous medical condition, and his medical expenses and other damages. The cruise ship owner presented evidence that the cruise ship was following its approved route and that the whale could not have been detected before impact, and that the bump would not have injured someone in ordinary health. At the close of the evidence, the cruise ship owner moved for a directed verdict. How should the court rule
Answers
Answer: Grant the motion, because there is no evidence that the crew operated the ship negligently.
Explanation:
The court should rule by granting the cruise ship owner's motion due to the fact that the passenger has not been able to establish a case of negligence against the ship.
It should be noted that in order to establish a prima facie case for negligence, the plaintiff in this case must be able to show a duty of care, then a breach of that duty, a proximate cause, and the damages. However, in this case, the passenger doesn't have enough evidence to back up his claim.
The signs of drug addiction are similar to those related to drug abuse...
A. but to a lesser degree.
B. but to a greater degree.
C. in the all same ways.
Answers
1.
If you're feeling sleepy, but can't wait to get to the destination, you should
A. drive faster
B. drink a lot of coffee, then drive
C-turn up the music to stay awake
D. take a nap or call a rideshare service or taxi
Answers
What do these cartoons say about the Republicans' failure to pass a new health care bill?
Answers
Answer:
La protesta de los Ciudadanos
A state department of education has created a fund of a specific amount to be distributed among the public and private elementary schools within the state to provide instructional programs in mathematics. The amount of funds available to a school will be based on the number of students attending the school and the number of schools that elect to receive funds. Concerned that the expenditure of funds will benefit parochial schools at the expense of public schools, parents of public-school children have filed suit against the state secretary of education in federal district court seeking an injunction to block the distribution of these funds to parochial schools as a violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as made applicable to the state via the Fourteenth Amendment. How is the court likely to rule in this suit
Answers
Answer:
Doesn't fall under the First Amendment nor the Fourteenth Amendment. Try again.
19. WHICH OF THESE IS A GOOD WAY TO SPOT DRIVING HAZARDS A. Focus on the vehicle ahead B. Focus on your inside mirrors C. Scan ahead of your vehicle
Answers
criminologist wants to gain an in-depth understanding of the subculture of a street gang in a particular city. Which one of the following methods would be the most appropriate method for obtaining such an understanding? P.S. how down to talk....
Answers
Answer:
Undercover?
Explanation:
How better than to become one of them?
One man leads North Korea and controls its government. He also controls its ruling political party. The ruling party chooses candidates for an Assembly, and citizens vote. The candidates do not have opponents, so citizens have no choices. North Korea has a(n) ___________________________________.
Answers
Answer:
Dictatorship or One-Party State
Explanation:
identify the powers used by the election commission towards the conduct of election is it good for the democracy to give theses all powers to election commission
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The election commission has the right to allow symbols to the political parties. It gives recognition to the national parties, state parties and regional parties. It sets limits on poll expenses. The commission prepare electoral rolls and update the voter's list from time to time.
You see a green buoy. What should you do?
Answers
Answer:
pass to the right
Explanation:
Green buoy means pass to the right
La pieza de abajo está muy arriba coherencia ejemplo
Answers
Explanation:
Coherence is defined as anything that is logical, continuous, and makes more sense world in general. An argumentation with no contradictions is an example of coherence. Congruency is the characteristic of being intellectually integrated, consistent, and understandable. His tale was disjointed.
Answer:
La pieza que se encuentra arriba esta en lo bajo
Creo que es asi, perdon.
To achieve bipartisanship, what do both major parties have to do?
work together
work against each other
have healthy debate
campaign strongly
Answers
Answer:
Work together
Explanation:
: )
Compare and contrast a federalist system of government to a confederate system of government.
Answers
Answer:
The main comparative difference between a federal state and a confederate state lies in the role of the sub-national entities of each. Thus, in a federation, it is the federal state that has sovereignty over sub-national entities, which cannot secede or nullify federal laws, that is, they are in a clear position of inferiority with respect to the federation. For their part, in confederation, sub-national entities remain sovereign, that is, with the full capacity to make decisions on their own, including the rights of secession and nullification; with which the confederate state is rather a central point of debate between the different sovereign states that make up the confederation.
A pedestrian was injured when hit by a chair that was thrown from an upper-story hotel window. The pedestrian sued the occupants of all the rooms from which the chair might have been thrown. At trial, the pedestrian has been unable to offer any evidence as to the exact room from which the chair was thrown. The defendants have filed a motion for a directed verdict. Should the court grant the motion
Answers
Answer:
Yes the court should grant the motion
Explanation:
Because the pedestrian is injured and he knows that the from hotel the chair was thrown. The hotel manager should be responsible for this because he didn't mention that throwing chair outside is strictly prohibited.
Yes the court should grant the motion because the pedestrian is injured and he knows that the from hotel the chair was thrown. The hotel manager should be responsible for this because he did not mention that throwing chair outside is strictly prohibited.
What does it mean when a motion is granted?If the motion is granted, a decision on the claims involved is made without a trial. In most cases, the motion must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the opposing party loses on that claim even if all of its allegations are accepted as true.
A pedestrian was injured when hit by a chair that was thrown from an upper-story hotel window. The pedestrian sued the occupants of all the rooms from which the chair might have been thrown. At trial, the pedestrian has been unable to offer any evidence as to the exact room from which the chair was thrown. The defendants have filed a motion for a directed verdict.
Therefore, the court should grant the motion.
To learn more about motion granted, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13461346
#SPJ2
