Answer:
The minimum sample size is [tex]n = 2123[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The margin of error is [tex]E = 0.028[/tex]
Given that the confidence level is 99% then the level of significance is evaluated as
[tex]\alpha = 100 - 99[/tex]
[tex]\alpha = 1 \%[/tex]
[tex]\alpha =0.01[/tex]
Next we obtain the critical value of [tex]\frac{ \alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table
The value is [tex]Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} } = 2.58[/tex]
Now let assume that the sample proportion is [tex]\r p = 0.5[/tex]
hence [tex]\r q = 1 - \r p[/tex]
=> [tex]\r q = 0.50[/tex]
Generally the sample size is mathematically represented as
[tex]n =[ \frac{Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} }}{ E} ]^2 * \r p * \r q[/tex]
[tex]n =[ \frac{2.58}{ 0.028} ]^2 * 0.5 * 0.5[/tex]
[tex]n = 2123[/tex]
PLEASE HELP ASAP THANKS IN ADVANCE
Answer:
the answer to the question is "C"
Simple linear regression methods can be used for studying relationship among maximum five variables. True False
Answer:
False.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a data where two variables are observed simultaneously, such data is termed to be Bivariate Data. When this data are represented graphically, such a diagrammatic representation is called scatter diagram. In a scatter diagram, all the points lie on or near one particular line. This line is called the regression line.
Recall that the equation for a straight line in the gradient intercept form is y = ax+b .
As an approximation , one can fit the regression line by first computing x and y. The regression line should pass through (x,y) in such a way that the remaining scatter points are evenly distributed on both sides of the line. Therefore, Simple linear regression methods can be used for studying relationship among maximum five variables is a false statement.
The students at a High School earned money for an international animal rescue foundation. 82 seniors earned an average $26.75 per student, 74 juniors earned an average $12.25 per student, 96 sophomores earned an average $15.50 per student, and 99 freshmen earned an average $10.85 per student. What was the average collection for a student in this school? A. $16.13 B. $5.37 C. $16.34 D. $16.63
Answer: A. $16.13
Step-by-step explanation:
Total students = 82+74+96+99 =351
Sum of earnings of 82 seniors = $26.75 x 82= $2193.5
Sum of earnings of 74 juniors = $12.25 x 74 = $906.5
Sum of earnings of 96 sophomores = $15.50 x 96 = $1488
Sum of earnings of 99 freshmen = $10.85 x 99 = $1074.15
Total earnings = $2193.5 + $906.5+ $1488 +$1074.15
= $5662.15
(Total earnings) ÷ (Total students )
= $5662.15÷ 351
= $16.13
Help someone please!!
Answer:
A. 5:4
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the question mentions twelfths of a pie, it is easier to say each pie has 12 pieces or 36 total pieces ordered from the 3 pies. Ty ate 5 and Rob ate 15 which is 3 times more than Ty. A total of 20 pieces have been eaten from the 36 you started with. Eaten = 20 and Remaining = 16. So the ratio is 20:16 which is simplified to 5:4.
Translate the statements into a confidence interval for p. Approximate the level of confidence. In a survey of 8451 U.S. adults, 31.4% said they were taking vitamin E as a supplement. The survey's margin of error is plus or minus 1%.
Answer:
The confidence interval is [tex]0.304 < p < 0.324[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told
The sample proportion [tex]\r p = 0.314[/tex]
The margin of error is [tex]E = 0.01[/tex]
The confidence interval for p is mathematically represented as
[tex]\r p - E < p < \r p + E[/tex]
=> [tex]0.314 - 0.01 < p < 0.314 + 0.01[/tex]
=> [tex]0.304 < p < 0.324[/tex]
What is the area, in square meters, of the shaded part of the rectangle shown below?
Answer:
C) 100 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
(14*6)/2*10
20/2*10
10*10
100
The area of the given shaded part of the rectangle is 100 square meters as shown.
What is the area of a triangle?The entire space filled by a triangle's three sides in a two-dimensional plane is defined as its area.
The fundamental formula for calculating the area of a triangle is A = 1/2 b h.
The area of the shaded part = area of the rectangle - area of the triangle
The area of the shaded part = 14 × 10 - (1/2) × 8 × 10
The area of the shaded part = 140 - 80/2
The area of the shaded part = 140 - 40
Apply the subtraction operation, and we get
The area of the shaded part = 100 meters²
Thus, the area of the given shaded part of the rectangle is 100 square meters.
Learn more about the triangles here:
https://brainly.com/question/17997149
#SPJ3
Solve for x: 5x + 2 = 4x - 9
Answer:
x = - 11
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
5x + 2 = 4x - 9 ( subtract 4x from both sides )
x + 2 = - 9 ( subtract 2 from both sides )
x = - 11
Answer: x = -11
Step-by-step explanation:
Move all terms containing x to the left side of the equation.
A mathematical statement that says two expressions have the same value; any number sentence with an = .
A square has a side length that is decreasing at a rate of 8 cm per second. What is the rate of change of the area of the square when the side length is 7 cm
Answer:
112cm²/secStep-by-step explanation:
Area of a square is expressed as A = L² where L is the length of one side of the square.
The rate of change of area will be expressed using chain rule as;
dA/dt = dA/dL * dL/dt where;
dL/dt is the rate at which the side length of the square is decreasing.
Given L = 7cm, dL/dt = 8cm/sec and dA/dL = 2L
dA/dL = 2(7)
dA/dL = 14cm
Substituting the given value into the chain rule expression above to get the rate of change of the area of the square, we will have;
dA/dt = dA/dL * dL/dt
dA/dt = 14cm * 8cm/sec
dA/dt = 112cm²/sec
Hence, the rate of change of the area of the square when the side length is 7 cm is 112cm²/sec
Simplify 70 +(-30)+2+(-9)+0.3+(-0.1)=[70+(-30)] +[2+(-9)]+[0.3+(-0.1)]
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
When you add the left side of the equation, you get 33.2 because 70-30 is 40, 40+2 is 42, 42-9 is 33, 33+0.3 is 33.03, 33.3-0.1 is 33.2.
When you add the right side of the equation, you get 33.2, because they are the same problem but on side has brackets.
Hope this helps you.
Lori wants to buy a radio for 60 dollars.
She can pay $60 now, or she can pay $12
a month for 6 months. How much more will
she pay for the radio if she makes monthly
payments?
Answer:
Lori will pay $12 more if she makes monthly payments
Step-by-step explanation:
to find how much she will pay for 6 months, we have to multiply 12 by 6 to get $72
subtracting the amount she would pay as a down payment
$72 - $60 is $12
Lori will pay $12 more if she makes monthly payments
In a regression class, a student suggested the following: If extremely influential outlying cases are detected in a data set, simply discard these cases from the data set. Provide your comments as the validity of this statement.
Answer:
Discarding the influential outlying cases when detected is also known as flagging outliers in a data set, and this is because outliers do not follow the rest of the dataset's pattern. if this outliers are not discarded they would have a negative effect on any model attached to the dataset
Step-by-step explanation:
In a regression class ; If extremely influential outlying cases are detected in a Data set, discarding this influential outlying cases is the right way to go about it
Discarding the influential outlying cases when detected is also known as flagging outliers in a data set, and this is because outliers do not follow the rest of the dataset's pattern. if this outliers are not discarded they would have a negative effect on any model attached to the dataset
sam ran 63,756 feet in 70 minutes what is sam rate in miles per hour there are 5,280 feet in one mile
Answer:
simply convert first feets into miles
Given is 5280 feets=1 miles
63756 /5280=12.075 miles
70 minutes = 1.16666= 1.17 hrs
rate is 12.075 miles/1.17 hrs
Step-by-step explanation:
GIVING OUT BRAINLIEST TO THE FIRST PERSON WHO ANSWERS!! I would appreciate if if you do answer though! <3
Also, include ALL work!
Answer:
The answer is option BStep-by-step explanation:
Total number of people = 800
To find the number of unemployed people we must first find the total percentage of the pie chart
That's
25 + 10 + 5 + 60 = 100%
5 % out of the 100% are unemployed
To find the number of unemployed people divide 5 % by the total percentage that's 100% and multiply them by the total number of people
That's
[tex] \frac{5}{100} \times 800[/tex]
5 × 8
We have the final answer as
40 peopleHope this helps you
Two friends are standing at opposite corners of a rectangular courtyard. The dimensions of the courtyard are 12 ft. by 25 ft. How far apart are the friends?
Answer:
27.73 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the Pythagorean theorem. It easiest to think of the distance between the two friends as a triangle in the rectangle. One side is 12ft and the other is 25ft.
12^2+25ft^2=769
The square root of 769 is 27.73
Answer:
27.73 Ft
Step-by-step explanation:I took the test
the volume of a cube is 3375 cubic inches. what is the measure of each side of the cube
Answer:
The measure of each side of the cube is
15 inchesStep-by-step explanation:
Since it's a cube all it's sides are equal
To find the length of each side we use the formula
Volume of a cube = l³
where l is the measure of one side
From the question
Volume = 3375 cubic inches
Substitute this value into the formula and solve for l
That's
[tex] {l}^{3} = 3375[/tex]Find the cube root of both sides
That's
[tex] \sqrt[3]{ {l}^{3} } = \sqrt[3]{3375} [/tex]We have the final answer as
l = 15 inchesHope this helps you
convert the following measurements 13 miles to a yard
Answer:
22,880 yard
Step-by-step explanation:
1 mile - 1760 yard
therefore 13 miles x 1760 yard/mile = 22,880 yard
find the perimeter of a square of sides 10.5cm
Answer:
Perimeter = 42 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
A square has all equal sides so you would just add 10.5 + 10.5 + 10.5 + 10.5 to get 42 cm.
Answer:
42 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Side of square = 10.5 cm (given)
Perimeter of square = Side X 4
= 10.5 X 4
= 42 cm
HOPE THIS HELPED YOU !
:)
You need a shelf for a small space in your house, so you make a measurement with your meter stick and head to the store. Once there, you find that the dimension of the shelves you want is given in cm. If your space measured 0.8 m, and the shelves at the store measure 30 cm, answer the following questions: 1) How many meters wide is the shelf you want to buy? 2) Will it fit in your house? yes no
Answer:
1. 0.3 m
2. yes
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Given that
Measurement of space = 0.8m
measurement of the shelves = 30 cm = 0.3 m as 1 m = 100 cm
So for 30 cm it would be
= 0.30 ÷ 100
= 0.3 m
Based on the above information,
1. The number of meters wide for the shelf to buy is 0.3 m
2 And yes it is fitted in the house
Using the required conversion metrics, the width of the shelf at the stis 0.3 meters and will not fit in the house.
Given the Parameters :
Measured width = 0.8 mStore width = 30 cmUsing the appropriate metric conversion values :
100 cm = 1 m
Converting the store measurement into meters :
30 cm ÷ 100 = 0.3 meters
Hence, the shelf you want to purchase measures 0.3 meters.
Since, the measured width and the width of the shelf at the store are different, then the shelf will not fit in.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/16867858
Which is one of the transformations applied to the graph of f(x) = X^2 to change it into the graph of g(x) = -x^2 +16x - 44
Answer: First a horizontal shift of 8 units, then a reflection over the x-axis, and then a vertical shift of 20 units.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's construct g(x) in baby steps.
Ok, we start with f(x) = x^2
The first thing we have is a horizontal translation of A units (where A is not known)
A vertical translation of N units to the right, is written as:
g(x) = f(x - N)
Then we have:
g(x) = (x - A)^2 = x^2 - 2*A*x + A^2
Now, you can see that actually g(x) has a negative leading coefficient, which means that we also have an inversion over the x-axis.
Remember that if we have a point (x, y), a reflection over the x-axis transforms our point into (x, -y)
Then if we apply also a reflection over the x-axis, we have:
g(x) = -f(x - A) = -x^2 + 2*A*x - A^2 = -x^2 + 16*x - 44
Then:
2*A = 16
A*A = 44.
The first equation says that A = 16/2 = 8
But 8^2 is not equal to 44.
Then we need another constant coefficient, which is related to a vertical translation.
If we have a relation y = f(x), a vertical translation of N units up, will be
y = f(x) + N.
Then:
g(x) = -f(x - A) + B
-x^2 + 2*A*x - A^2 + B = x^2 + 16*x - 44
Now we have:
2*A = 16
-A^2 + B = - 44
From the first equation we have A = 8, now we replace it in the second equation and get:
-8^2 + B = -44
B = -44 + 64 = 20
Then we have:
The transformation is:
First an horizontal shift of 8 units, then a reflection over the x-axis, and then a vertical shift of 20 units.
A 160-lb man carries a 5-lb can of paint up a helical staircase that encircles a silo with radius 20 ft. If the silo is 90 ft high and the man makes exactly three complete revolutions, how much work is done by the man against gravity in climbing to the top
Weight of man and paint = 160 + 5 = 165 total pounds.
Gravitational force is independent of the path taken so we can ignore the radius of the silo.
Work done = total weight x height
The problem says he climbs to the top so overall height is 90 feet
Work = 165 lbs x 90 ft = 14,850 ft-lbs
Fill in the following blanks to prove that n 2^1 n < 2^n n+1 < 2^(n+1) is Box 3 Options: True | False Next, assume that Box 4 Options: 1 < 2^1 k + 1 < 2^(k+1) k < 2^k as we attempt to prove Box 5 Options: k < 2^k k + 1 < 2^(k+1) 2 < 2^1 Therefore, we can conclude that Box 6 Options: k < 2^k k + 1 < 2^(k+1) 2^1 < 2^k k + 2 < 2^(k+2)
Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
n < 2^n
First let n=1
1 < 2^1
1 <2 This is true
Next, assume that
(k) < 2^(k)
as we attempt to prove that
(k+1) < 2^(k+1)
.
.
.
Therefore we can conclude that
k+1 < 2^(k+1)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello, please consider the following.
First, assume that n equals [tex]\boxed{1}[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\boxed{1<2^1}[/tex] is [tex]\boxed{\text{True}}[/tex]
Next, assume that [tex]\boxed{k<2^k}[/tex], as we attempt to prove [tex]\boxed{k+1<2^{k+1}}[/tex]
Since .... Therefore, we can conclude that [tex]\boxed{k+1<2^{k+1}}[/tex]
The choice for the last box is confusing. Based on your feedback, we can assume that we are still in the step 2 though.
And the last step which is not included in your question is the conclusion where we can say that we prove that for any integer [tex]n\geq 1[/tex], we have [tex]n<2^n[/tex].
Hope this helps.
Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.
Thank you
A vending machine company wants to check three of its machines to determine if they are properly dispensing 12 ounces of coffee. Their data is given below α = 0.01.
Row Machine A Machine B Machine C
1 11.5 10.3 11.1
2 12.1 9.7 11.3
3 11.6 10.4 11.9
4 12.0 10.7 11.5
5 11.1 9.9 11.7
6 12.2 10.1 11.3
H0: μA = μB = μC
Ha: Not all means are equal
One-way ANOVA: Machine A, Machine B, Machine C
Source DF SS MS F P
Factor 2 8.363 4.182 31.73 0.000
Error 15 1.977 0.132
Total 17 10.340
P-value: _____
Decision: _____
Is there a significant difference between the vending machines A, B, and C? Use α=0.05.
A. No, there is no significant difference between the means.
B. Yes, there is a significant difference between the means.
C. The F-test cannot be used to answer whether or not there is a significant difference between the means.
Answer:
The correct option is B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis to determine whether the vending machines are properly dispensing 12 ounces of coffee is:
H₀: [tex]\mu_{A}=\mu_{B}=\mu_{C}[/tex]
Hₐ: Not all means are equal.
The ANOVA output is as follows:
One-way ANOVA: Machine A, Machine B, Machine C
Source DF SS MS F P
Factor 2 8.363 4.182 31.73 0.000
Error 15 1.977 0.132
Total 17 10.340
The significance level is α = 0.05.
The p-value of the model is:
p-value = 0.000
Decision rule:
If the p-value of the test is less than the significance level then the null hypothesis will be rejected.
p-value = 0.000 < α = 0.05
The null hypothesis will be rejected.
Conclusion:
There is a significant difference between the means.
Thus, the correct option is B.
will mark brainliest. PROMISE!! A stick has a length of $5$ units. The stick is then broken at two points, chosen at random. What is the probability that all three resulting pieces are longer than $1$ unit?
Answer:
0.16
Step-by-step explanation:
Length = 5 unitsNumber of broken sticks= 3Equal lengths = 5 units/3See the picture attached for reference.
As you see the best points are the green areas which covers 2 out of 5 zones.
Since it is same for both broken points, the probability of this is:
2/5*2/5 = 4/ 25 = 0.16Answer is 0.16
You are an urban planner assessing the growth of a city. Ten years ago, the city's population was 250,823. Its current population is 325,823. By about what percentage has the city grown over the past ten years? Round to the nearest percent.
Answer:
Here is the answer i got-
Step-by-step explanation:
325823-250823=75000
325823’s 244367250percent is 75000
Please answer this correctly without making mistakes
Answer:
6 1/6 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
since 2/3 coverted into sixths is 4/6, and 14-6 is 8, and 1/2 into sixths is 3/6, 4/6-3/6 is 1/6. You put the whole in the front and you have 6 1/6
Suppose that the neighboring cities of Tweed and Ledee are long-term rivals. Neal, who was born and raised in Tweed, is confident that Tweed residents are more concerned about the environment than the residents of Ledee. He knows that the average electricity consumption of Tweed households last February was 854.11 kWh and decides to test if Ledee residents used more electricity that month, on average. He collects data from 65 Ledee households and calculates the average electricity consumption to be 879.28 kWh with a standard deviation of 133.29 kWh. There are no outliers in his sample data. Neal does not know the population standard deviation nor the population distribution. He uses a one-sample t-test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to test the null hypothesis, H0:µ=854.11, against the alternative hypothesis, H1:μ>854.11 , where μ is the average electricity consumption of Ledee households last February. Neal calculates a t‑statistic of 1.522 and a P-value of 0.066.
Based on these results, complete the following sentences to state the decision and conclusion of the test.
Neal's decision is to__________ the __________ (p 0.066). There is_________ evidence to _________ the claim that the average electricity consumption of ____________ is _________ , ________
Complete Question
The option to the blank space are shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
Neal's decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis (p 0.066). There is no sufficient evidence to prove the claim that the average electricity consumption of all Ledee household is greater than , 854.28 kWh
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is [tex]\mu = 854.11[/tex]
The sample size is [tex]n = 65[/tex]
The sample mean is [tex]\= x = 879.28 \ kWh[/tex]
The standard deviation is [tex]\sigma = 133.29 \ kWh[/tex]
The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]
The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o: \mu = 854.11[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu > 854.11[/tex]
The t-statistics is [tex]t = 1.522[/tex]
The p-value is [tex]p-value = 0.066[/tex]
Now from the given data we can see that
[tex]p-value < \alpha[/tex]
Generally when this is the case , we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So
Neal's decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis (p 0.066). There is no sufficient evidence to prove the claim that the average electricity consumption of all Ledee household is greater than , 854.28 kWh
Find the product. (7x+2)(x−1) A 8x+1 B 6x+3 C 7x2−5x−2 D 7x2−2
Answer:
7x^2 -5x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
(7x+2)(x−1)
FOIL
first 7x*x = 7x^2
outer 7x*-1 = -7x
inner 2x
last 2*-1 = -2
Add them together
7x^2 -7x+2x -2
7x^2 -5x-2
Answer:
[tex] \boxed{\red{7 {x}^{2} - 5x - 2}}[/tex]
Answer C is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex](7x + 2)(x - 1) \\ 7x(x - 1) + 2(x -1 ) \\ 7 {x}^{2} - 7x + 2x - 2 \\ = 7 {x}^{2} - 5x - 2[/tex]
Jessica is at a charity fundraiser and has a chance of receiving a gift. The odds in favor of receiving a gift are 5/12. Find the probability of Jessica receiving a gift.
Answer:
5/17
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a question to calculate probability from odds. The formula is given as:
A formula for calculating probability from odds is P = Odds / (Odds + 1)
From the question , we are told that the odds of receiving a gift is
= 5:12
The probability of Jessica receiving a gift =
Probability = Odds / (Odds + 1)
P = 5/12 / ( 5/12 + 1)
P = (5/12)/ (17/12)
P = 5/12 × 12/17
= 5/17
Therefore, the probability of Jessica. receiving a gift is 5/17.
A line passes through the point ( 10,3 ) and has a slope of 1/2. write an equation in slope-intercept form for this line.
Answer:
[tex]\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}x-2[/tex]
Solve
The point-slope form is represented with the formula:
[tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex]
We are given a point [tex](x_1, y_1)[/tex] and a slope: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}[/tex].
We are asked to solve this equation in slope-intercept form, which is:
[tex]y=mx+b[/tex]
Givens
[tex]x_1: 10\\\\y_1: 3\\\\\displaystyle m: \frac{1}{2}[/tex]
To solve:
1. Substitute the givens into the point-slope form equation:
[tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)\\\\\displaystyle y-3=\frac{1}{2}(x-10)[/tex]
2. Simplify by using the distributive property, which states:
[tex]a(b+c)=ab+ac[/tex]
[tex]\displaystyle y-3=\frac{1}{2}x-5[/tex]
3. Simplify further by combining like terms:
[tex]\displaystyle y-3+3=\frac{1}{2}x-5+3\\\\\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}x-2[/tex]
The final answer in slope-intercept form is:
[tex]\large \boxed{\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}x-2}[/tex]
Answer:
y = 1/2x - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
y = mx + b Slope Intercept Form
Step 2:
y = 1/2x + b Equation
Step 3:
3 = 1/2 ( 10 ) + b Input x and y
Step 4:
3 = 5 + b Multiply
Step 5:
3 - 5 = b Subtract 5 on both sides
Step 6:
b = - 2
Answer:
y = 1/2x - 2
Hope This Helps :)
The research group asked the following question of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year and those who earned less than $100,000 per year: "Do you believe that it is morally wrong for unwed women to have children?" Of the individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year, said yes; of the individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year, said yes. Construct a 95% confidence interval to determine if there is a difference in the proportion of individuals who believe it is morally wrong for unwed women to have children.
Complete Question
The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
The lower bound is [tex]0.0234[/tex]
The upper bound is [tex]0.100[/tex]
So from the value obtained the solution to the question are
1 Does not include
2 sufficient
3 not different
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year is [tex]n_ 1 = 1205[/tex]
The number of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year that said yes is
[tex]w = 712[/tex]
The sample size individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year is [tex]n_2 = 1310[/tex]
The number of individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year that said yes is
[tex]v= 693[/tex]
The sample proportion of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year that said yes is
[tex]\r p _ 1 = \frac{w}{n_1 }[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]\r p _ 1 = \frac{712}{1205}[/tex]
[tex]\r p _ 1 =0.5909[/tex]
The sample proportion of individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year that said yes is
[tex]\r p _ 1 = \frac{v}{n_2 }[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]\r p _ 1 = \frac{693 }{1310}[/tex]
[tex]\r p _ 1 = 0.529[/tex]
Given that the confidence level is 95% then the level of significance is mathematically represented as
[tex]\alpha = 1 -0.95[/tex]
[tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]
Next we obtain the critical value of [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table the value is [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]
Generally the margin of error is
[tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * \sqrt{ \frac{ \r p _1 (1- \r p_1 )}{n_1} + \frac{ \r p _2 (1- \r p_2 )}{n_2} } }[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]E = 1.96 * \sqrt{ \frac{ 0.5909 (1- 0.5909 )}{1205} + \frac{ 0.592 (1- 0.6592 )}{1310} } }[/tex]
[tex]E =0.03846[/tex]
Generally the 95% confidence interval is
[tex](\r p_1 - \r p_2) - E < p_1 - p_2 <( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) + E[/tex]
substituting values
[tex](0.5909 - 0.529 ) - 0.03846 < p_1 - p_2 < (0.5909 - 0.529 ) + 0.03846[/tex]
[tex]0.02344 < p_1 - p_2 < 0.10036[/tex]
The lower bound is [tex]0.0234[/tex]
The upper bound is [tex]0.100[/tex]
So from the value obtained the solution to the question are
1 Does not include
2 sufficient
3 not different
The lower bound is 0.0234 and the upper bound is 0.100. Then the 95% confidence interval is (0.0234, 0.100)
What is the margin of error?The probability or the chances of error while choosing or calculating a sample in a survey is called the margin of error.
The research group asked the following question of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year and those who earned less than $100,000 per year.
The sample size of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year will be
[tex]\rm n_1 =1205[/tex]
The sample size of individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year will be
[tex]\rm n_1 =1205[/tex]
The number of individuals who earn an excess of $100,000 per year that said yes will be
[tex]\rm w = 712[/tex]
The number of individuals who earn less than $100,000 per year that said yes will be
[tex]\rm v= 693[/tex]
Then the sample proportion of individuals who earned in excess of $100,000 per year that said yes will be
[tex]\rm \hat{p}_1=\dfrac{w}{n_1}\\\\\hat{p}_1=\dfrac{712}{1205}\\\\\hat{p}_1= 0.5909[/tex]
Then the sample proportion of individuals who earned less than $100,000 per year that said yes will be
[tex]\rm \hat{p}_2=\dfrac{v}{n_2}\\\\\hat{p}_2=\dfrac{693}{1310}\\\\\hat{p}_2= 0.529[/tex]
The confidence level is 95% then the level of significance is mathematically represented as
[tex]\alpha =1-0.95\\\\\alpha =0.05[/tex]
Then the critical value of α/2 from the normal distribution table. Then the value of z is 1.96, then the error of margin will be
[tex]E = z_{\alpha /2} \times \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \dfrac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}}\\\\E = 1.96 \times \sqrt{\dfrac{05909(1-0.5909)}{1205} + \dfrac{0.529(1-0529)}{1310}}\\\\E = 0.03846[/tex]
The 95% confidence interval will be
[tex]\begin{aligned} (\hat{p}_1-\hat{p}_2)-E & < p_1-p_2 < (\hat{p}_1-\hat{p}_2) + E\\\\(0.5909 - 0.529) - 0.03846 & < p_1-p_2 < (0.5909 - 0.529) + 0.03846\\\\0.02344 & < p_1-p_2 < 0.10036 \end{aligned}[/tex]
More about the margin of error link is given below.
https://brainly.com/question/6979326
