very easy question please answer asap giving brainliest

Answer:

Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_d[/tex] = 0

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]\mu_d\neq[/tex] 0    

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a local insurance agent randomly selected profiles for 10 of his clients and checked online price quotes for their policies.

Then, based on paired data on the 10 clients (the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote), he obtained t-statistic = 0.709 p-value = 0.248.

Here , we will use the concept of Paired data test statistics because the prices that the local insurance agent offered and the corresponding online quotes are from the same single data. These information has not been taken from the two independent samples.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_d[/tex] = 0    

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]\mu_d\neq[/tex] 0    

Here, null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote.

On the other hand, alternate hypothesis states that there is difference between the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote.

Hence, this would be the correct null and alternative hypothesis.

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5+1+3=9

and there is 3 cheese pizza so its 3 over 8.

Answer:

3/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:24

Step-by-step explanation:

Height =4

Base=6

Area of parallelogram=base x height

Area of parallelogram=6 x 4

Area of parallelogram=24

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Rewrite in standard form to find the center  

( h , k )  and radius  r .

Center:  ( 0 , 2 )  Radius:  4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Rewrite in standard form to find the center  

( h , k )  and radius  r .

Center:  ( 0 , 2 )  Radius:  4

Lol hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

~ x = 12 centimeters of the route on map ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. We can see that we have to determine the cm of the route on the map, so let us convert the 1.8 kilometers ⇒ centimeters:

1.8 km = 180,000 cm

2. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      1       =           15,000      ⇒   x - centimeters of the route on the map

      x                   180,000

3. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

15,000 * x = 180,000,

x = 12 centimeters of the route on map

Answer:

3cm+2cm+5cm=10cm

%=100

10*10=100

2cm*10=20%

Step-by-step explanation:

the shaded area is width of 2 2/10 or 20/100

Answer:

33%

Step-by-step explanation:

for if u want to do it 4cm then

4+3+3=10

100π cm^2

49π cm^2

16π cm^2

49π - 16π = 33π

33/100 =33%

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

Ummmm 2 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

True? What are you asking

Step-by-step explanation:

But yes triangles are congruent by either of those

Answer:

you're not really asking anything, or is this a true/false statement

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:25 in^2

Step-by-step explanation:

d1=10 d2=5

area of rhombus=( d1 x d2)/2

Area of rhombus=(10x5)/2

area of rhombus=50/2

Area of rhombus=25 in^2

Answer:

The probability that a club member picked randomly is female, given that the person prefers swimming on weekends, is 0.8 = 80%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the conditional probability formula to solve this question. It is

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)}[/tex]

In which

P(B|A) is the probability of event B happening, given that A happened.

[tex]P(A \cap B)[/tex] is the probability of both A and B happening.

P(A) is the probability of A happening.

In this question:

Event A: Prefers swimming on weekends.

Event B: Being female.

25% prefer swimming on weekends

This means that [tex]P(A) = 0.25[/tex]

It is found that 20% of the members in that city prefer swimming on weekends and are female

This means that [tex]P(A \cap B) = 0.2[/tex]

So

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)} = \frac{0.2}{0.25} = 0.8[/tex]

The probability that a club member picked randomly is female, given that the person prefers swimming on weekends, is 0.8 = 80%.

Answer:

AB=21 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it's a right angles triangle, we'll use Pythagoras theorem

HYPOTENUSE ²= base² + perpendicular ²

Where hyp=AB, base=16 and perp=13

AB²=16²+13²

AB²=256+169

AB²=425

Taking sq root.

AB=20.6 miles

AB≈21 miles

Answer:

Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is 0.417890.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the paper claims that 43% of all constituents believe their representative possesses low ethical standards.

Suppose 20 of a representative's constituents are randomly and independently sampled.

The above situation can be represented through binomial distribution;

[tex]P(X=r) = \binom{n}{r} \times p^{r} \times (1-p)^{n-r} ; x = 0,1,2,3,.....[/tex]

where, n = number of trials (samples) taken = 20 constituents

            r = number of success = more than eight but fewer than 12

            p = probability of success which in our question is probability that

                  all constituents believe their representative possesses low

                  ethical standards, i.e; p = 43%

Let X = Number of constituents who believe their representative possesses low ethical standards

So, X ~ Binom(n = 20 , p = 0.43)

Now, Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is given by = P(8 < X < 12)

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

= [tex]\binom{20}{9} \times 0.43^{9} \times (1-0.43)^{20-9}+ \binom{20}{10} \times 0.43^{10} \times (1-0.43)^{20-10}+\binom{20}{11} \times 0.43^{11} \times (1-0.43)^{20-11}[/tex]

= [tex]167960 \times 0.43^{9} \times 0.57^{11}+ 184756 \times 0.43^{10} \times 0.57^{10}+167960 \times 0.43^{11} \times 0.57^{9}[/tex]

= 0.417890

Hence, the required probability is 0.417890.

The probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is; C. 0.417890

We are given;

proportion; p = 43% = 0.43

sample size; n = 20

P(X = x) = ⁿCₓ * pˣ * (1 - p)ⁿ ⁻ ˣ

Thus the probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

From online binomial probability calculator, we have;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  0.17419889 + 0.14455452 + 0.09913627

P(8 < X < 12)  = 0.417890

Read more about binomial probability at; https://brainly.com/question/15246027

Answer:

$12.38

Step-by-step explanation:

Did you ever figure this out. I need the answer for a test.

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

x= 10

Step-by-step explanation:

1/5 x -2/3 = 4/3

Add 2/3 to each side

1/5x -2/3 +2/3 = 4/3 +2/3

1/5x = 6/3

1/5x = 2

Multiply each side by 5

1/5x * 5 = 2*5

x = 10

Answer:

The question is about the least amount to charge each policyholder as premium

The least premium is $484

Step-by-step explanation:

The least amount of premium to charge for this policy is the sum of the expected values of outcome of both instances of policyholder dying before the age of 70 and living after the age of 70 years

expected value of dying before 70 years=payout*probability=$24,200*2%=$484

Expected of living after 70=payout*probability=$0*98%=$0

sum of expected values=$484+$0=$484

Note that payout is nil if policyholder lives beyond 70 years

The premium of $573 means that a profit of $89 is recorded

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the numbers greater than nine are: 10,11,12

1,3,5,7,9

So that is nine numbers

9/12 can be simplified to 3/4 if you divide by 3

if you like my answer please give me the brainliest. I'm trying to boost my rank and I'm really close

Answer:

The value of the standardized test statistic for this significance test is -1.25.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a recent poll, 30 percent of adults said they wanted to "cut down or be free of gluten".

The researcher conducts a survey of a random sample of 25 students at her university and five of them say they want to at least reduce gluten.

Let p = population proportion of students wanting to reduce gluten at the university.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : p = 30%      {means that the proportion wanting to reduce gluten at the university is the same as for all adults}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : p < 30%     {means that a smaller proportion of students would say they want to reduce or be free of gluten}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample z test for proportions;

                           T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} {} }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of students who would say they want to reduce or be free of gluten = [tex]\frac{5}{25}[/tex] = 0.20

            n = sample of students taken = 25

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{0.20-0.30}{\sqrt\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{25} {} }[/tex]

                                     =  -1.25

The value of standardized z test statistic is -1.25.

Using the z-distribution, it is found that the value of the standardized test statistic for this significance test is:

D) –1.091

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 0.3, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.3[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of less than 0.3, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.3[/tex]

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

In which:

For this problem, the parameters are:

[tex]p = 0.3, n = 25, \overline{p} = \frac{5}{25} = 0.2[/tex]

Hence, the value of the test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.2 - 0.3}{\sqrt{\frac{0.3(0.7)}{25}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -1.091[/tex]

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24166849