All elections, including presidential ones, are held by the states, and constitutional revisions must be ratified by them. State governments have the authority to impose laws on business, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other matters inside their state, provided that those laws do not conflict with federal law.
What is the distribution of power between the national and state government in the US federal system?
Federalism restricts the scope of government by establishing two sovereign powers—the federal government and state governments—and limiting the influence of each. Internal constraints are imposed by the separation of powers by dividing one body of government against another, giving each branch distinct responsibilities, and requiring them to share power.
All elections, including presidential ones, are held by the states, and constitutional revisions must be ratified by them. State governments have the authority to impose laws on business, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other matters inside their state, provided that those laws do not conflict with federal law.
To find out more about the US state government, check out:
https://brainly.com/question/9261004
#SPJ4
which of the following is considered to be an acceptable reason for the use of police power, even if that use means the restriction of the right to privacy?
Option D is correct. Health concerns, Moral concerns and Safety concerns are considered to be an acceptable reason for the use of police power, even if that use means the restriction of the right to privacy
About right to privacy
The right to privacy in the digital age has given rise to challenging issues in the courts, as judges are expected to weigh the interests of individual privacy and national security on the one hand.
Due to the absence of a specific right to privacy in the United States of America Bill of Rights, a right to privacy jurisprudence in the United States of America is comparable to that in India.
The Fourth Amendment, the 14th Amendment, & the 9th Amendment are only a few of the rights in the United States that have been carved out to include the right to privacy. In Boyd v. United States, decided in 1886, the US Supreme Court affirmed an unconstitutional search & seizure as a violation of the inalienable rights to personal protection, personal liberty, & private property.
Question: Which of the following is considered to be an acceptable reason for the use of police power, even if that use means the restriction of the right to privacy?
Group of answer choices
A. Health concerns
B. Moral concerns
C. Safety concerns
D. All of the above.
To know more about right to privacy:
brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ4
Why did the Supreme Court declare the New York state law limiting bakers hours unconstitutional?
Lochner, 198 U.S. at 57, 61. The Court concluded that New York had failed to prove that the Bakeshop Act's maximum-hours provision had any close connection to public health.
It said that if it were to conclude otherwise, states would have unlimited power over citizens' lives.
The Court clarified that when it referred to "circumstances which exclude the right," it meant when states passed regulations in accordance with their inherent right to pass laws governing "health, safety, and morals." According to the court, since the Due Process Clause safeguarded the right to contract freely, state legislation could only impede it if they were lawful exercises of the police power.
The Court stated that in order to safeguard this freedom, American courts must carefully review state laws governing economic freedom, such as New York's bakery statute, to make sure they serve legitimate police-power objectives.
Learn more about Bakeshop Act's https://brainly.com/question/29378968
#SPJ4
in which of the following areas did regional interests and perspectives have the least impact on national policy?
The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.
What did alliances in World War 1 mean?A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.
What kind of alliances are examples of?One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.
To know more about alliances visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28195787
#SPJ4
Visit the Pew Research Center to research voter turnout and the election process in other countries. Once on Pew’s website, scroll down to find the appropriate graphs. It may be helpful to look at both the chart and data tabs to see the information in two different ways. Also pay attention to the footnotes below the chart for more information about the election process in other countries. Write one to two short paragraphs to answer the following questions:
Which countries have the highest and lowest voter turnout rates? Identify voter participation rates in these countries.
What do these countries do differently than the United States? How does the United States compare?
Switzerland is the nation that has the lowest voter turn out of 36.1% in the list of countries that appeared on the pew research while Uruguay has the highest amount of Voter turn out of 94.,9%
The nations may be having more citizens interested in the leadership of the nation while in Switzerland, the citizens may not really care about the electoral process.
The turnout in the United States is about 62.8% which is just fair.
What is meant by voter turn out?the proportion of voters who participate in elections; the number of registered voters who actually "show out" on election day. the elections for Congress.
The type of election (e.g., presidential or midterm) and the level of competition in the race are other factors that affect voter turnout. The number of voters in a jurisdiction who are of voting age (18 years or older)
The number of participants or attendees at an event. a significant voter turnout. a point at which something (like a road) branches off or makes a turn.
Read more on Voter turn out here: https://brainly.com/question/4459946
#SPJ1
State and federal administrative agencies may issue regulations that conflict. When a state regulation conflicts with a federal regulationa. the federal regulation takes precedence.b. the regulations are of equal effect.c. the state regulation takes precedence.d. the regulations are mutually void.
Option(a) the federal regulation takes precedence.
What is federal regulations?
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is a codification of the general and permanent regulations published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government. It is organised into 50 titles that reflect large areas of federal regulation.
What is the process of regulation?
The process of developing Federal rules is sometimes referred to as "rulemaking." First, Congress passes legislation to solve a social or economic need or problem. The legislation designates a certain agency to be in charge of enforcing the law, including the development of any required rules.
Hence Option(a) is a correct answer.
To know more about federal regulations follow link
https://brainly.com/question/15121922
#SPJ4
Should congress create a law mandating a balanced federal budget? support your position with evidence from the lesson.
No, Congress create a law mandating a balanced federal budget. A federal budget that is balanced can be passed by Congress at any time. Because of this, a constitutional amendment would be required to "mandate" a balanced federal budget.
The following Congress can easily reverse a law passed by the previous one requiring a balanced budget (providing the President agrees). To make having a balanced budget a permanent obligation, the Constitution must be amended. However, such an amendment must be carefully drafted to avoid having too many "loopholes" that render it useless. Passage of such a law would be extremely unlikely since, like many ideas, it would limit the authority of Congress. Additionally, a later Congress might just enact legislation resending it. It would be pointless to make an effort to achieve something without considering what ought to be. The majority of people agree that there shouldn't be any budget deficits, but they won't cut their own sacred cows—only those of others.
Learn more about federal budget here
https://brainly.com/question/2074848
#SPJ4
