Answer:
nononoonononononono
Explanation:
Answer:
SC was for the Commerce Compromise. Since only the lowcountry elite were at this meeting, they supported the idea that only people who were white males and owned land could vote. SC wanted a strong President.
hope this helps
Explanation:
Are modern organisms different from organisms of the past?
Answer: One of the most convincing arguments for evolution is the nature of the fossil record. In many of the fossil layers there are strange flora and fauna unlike any seen today, and very few of the fossil plants and animals found in these layers are similar to modern organisms. This convinces many people that evolution must be true, because only a change in life forms could explain how the fossils are so different from modern organisms, and such changes would take many millions of years.
How can one explain this feature of the fossil record in a creationist framework, especially from a young earth viewpoint? If life has only existed on earth for six thousand years or so, how can life forms have changed so much?
There is a very simple answer to this question. Consider the plants and animals found in temperate climates, such as in the United States. Compare them to the plants and animals found in the Amazon jungle, or in a swampy region of the United States, or in the African Savannah. There will be very few similarities. Probably very few of the birds, flowers, trees, et cetera from temperate climates will be found in the Amazon jungle. And probably very few plants and animals from the Amazon jungle will be found in the African Savannah. It is hard to believe that such different ecologies could exist at the same time on the same planet, but it is so.
This explains how the ecology in fossil layers can differ so much from that on earth today. Differences in climate and ecology explain the different kinds of organisms found in the past and today. The existence of giant insects and birds suggests that something was very different in the past. Perhaps the air pressure was higher and some past catastrophe caused much of the earth's atmosphere to be lost to space. Perhaps the composition of the atmosphere was somewhat different. In addition, the fierce dinosaurs would have made life difficult for any modern mammals, which explains their absence from fossil layers containing dinosaurs. Only some very small mammals that can hide in cracks in rocks could have co-existed with the dinosaurs.
Then what happened to all those ancient animals? Some died due to changes in climate, some died due to natural catastrophes, and some died due to human hunting. Also, some changes took place by evolution and adaptation; evolution proceeds most rapidly when populations are very large and conditions change drastically. In fact, under the right conditions, "evolution" (within limits) can take place very fast.
So where were the humans and modern animals in ancient times? They may have been living in higher altitudes where the climate was cooler and drier and the air pressure was less. Thus they would be less likely to have been covered and fossilized during the flood. In addition, the animals that existed in past ages may have been somewhat different than those we know today, due to the evolution and adaptation that has taken place since then.
Therefore the unusual plants and animals found in fossil layers, and the comparative lack of modern organisms in most fossil layers, is not a problem for creationism, not even for young earth creationism.
Explanation:
Answer:
One of the most convincing arguments for evolution is the nature of the fossil record. In many of the fossil layers there are strange flora and fauna unlike any seen today, and very few of the fossil plants and animals found in these layers are similar to modern organisms. This convinces many people that evolution must be true, because only a change in life forms could explain how the fossils are so different from modern organisms, and such changes would take many millions of years.
How can one explain this feature of the fossil record in a creationist framework, especially from a young earth viewpoint? If life has only existed on earth for six thousand years or so, how can life forms have changed so much?
There is a very simple answer to this question. Consider the plants and animals found in temperate climates, such as in the United States. Compare them to the plants and animals found in the Amazon jungle, or in a swampy region of the United States, or in the African Savannah. There will be very few similarities. Probably very few of the birds, flowers, trees, et cetera from temperate climates will be found in the Amazon jungle. And probably very few plants and animals from the Amazon jungle will be found in the African Savannah. It is hard to believe that such different ecologies could exist at the same time on the same planet, but it is so.
This explains how the ecology in fossil layers can differ so much from that on earth today. Differences in climate and ecology explain the different kinds of organisms found in the past and today. The existence of giant insects and birds suggests that something was very different in the past. Perhaps the air pressure was higher and some past catastrophe caused much of the earth's atmosphere to be lost to space. Perhaps the composition of the atmosphere was somewhat different. In addition, the fierce dinosaurs would have made life difficult for any modern mammals, which explains their absence from fossil layers containing dinosaurs. Only some very small mammals that can hide in cracks in rocks could have co-existed with the dinosaurs.
Then what happened to all those ancient animals? Some died due to changes in climate, some died due to natural catastrophes, and some died due to human hunting. Also, some changes took place by evolution and adaptation; evolution proceeds most rapidly when populations are very large and conditions change drastically. In fact, under the right conditions, "evolution" (within limits) can take place very fast.
So where were the humans and modern animals in ancient times? They may have been living in higher altitudes where the climate was cooler and drier and the air pressure was less. Thus they would be less likely to have been covered and fossilized during the flood. In addition, the animals that existed in past ages may have been somewhat different than those we know today, due to the evolution and adaptation that has taken place since then.
Therefore the unusual plants and animals found in fossil layers, and the comparative lack of modern organisms in most fossil layers, is not a problem for creationism, not even for young earth creationism.
Explanation:
Please mark the person on top of me brailist
help help help help help!
Answer:
Euclid ——> Wrote a book on geometry
Hippocrates ——-> Studied Medicine
Eratosthenes ———> Wrote a book on geography
Explanation:
ng complete sentences, explain what a hurricane is and how many affect the United States annually. Describe the damages caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Answer:
Explanation: To be simple, a hurricane (also known as a tropical cyclone) is a rapidly turning storm. Very Heavy winds and rains with big bolts of thunder. There is accordingly six hurricanes a year and nearly 3 major hurricanes a year. Hurricane katrina caused massive floods and caused of 100 billion dollars in damage.
Hurricane Katrina was one of the deadliest hurricanes ever to hit the United States. An estimated 1,833 people died in the hurricane and the flooding that followed in late August 2005, and millions of others were left homeless along the Gulf Coast and in New Orleans.
Hurricanes are large, swirling storms. They produce winds of 119 kilometers per hour (74 mph) or higher. ... Winds from a hurricane can damage buildings and trees. Hurricanes form over warm ocean waters.
Katrina was the most destructive storm to strike the United States and the costliest storm in U.S. history, causing $108 billion in damage, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It ranks sixth overall in strength of recorded Atlantic hurricanes. It was also a very large storm; at its peak, maximum winds stretched 25 to 30 nautical miles (46 to 55 kilometers) and its extremely wide swath of hurricane force winds extended at least 75 nautical miles (138 km) to the east from the center.
Explanation: can i maybe have brainliest?...
. . .
What made Germany bitter after World War I?
Treaty of Versailles
division of Germany
depression
trade disputes
Answer:
After the Treaty of Versailles called for punishing reparations, economic collapse and another world war thwarted Germany's ability to pay. Germany had been forced to become a republic instead of a monarchy, and its citizens were humiliated by their nation's bitter loss.
Explanation:
Answer:
If don't mistaken the answer is B
Explanation:
halp
Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.01 LC)
Which of the following is a "social contract?"
A belief that government has final authority over citizens
An agreement between citizens and non-citizens in government
An agreement between citizens and their government
A belief that government should be divided into three branches
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
The passage below was written by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. Writings like this greatly influenced the creators of the Declaration of Independence.
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power
on earth, and...to have only the __________ for his rule.
Based on what you know of the Declaration of Independence, which phrase completes the quotation?
divine king
law of nature
law of Parliament
limited monarchy
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
Which quote from the Declaration of Independence shows that the colonists believed the king did not support the colonial legislatures?
"He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries."
"He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good."
"For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us."
"For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world."
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
Why were the colonists angered at the king's response to the Olive Branch Petition?
They believed certain colonies were granted more rights than others.
They said it was unfair that only one colony was granted special rights.
They did not approve of the high tax that was placed on tea.
They believed the king did not view them as equal citizens with the right to petition.
Answer:
Question1:a belief that the government should be divided into three branches
Does anyone know if there are any celebrations/festivals during Hanukkah?
Answer:
i believe there is a parade for Hanukkah my friend said she went to one
Explanation:
Who were the rulers of Cuba and The Philippines prior to The Spanish American War?
Answer:
spanish and american
Explanation:
What was noteworthy about the Siege of Port Hudson in 1863?
It included African American troops who fought for the Union.
It was the first battle in the fight to control the Mississippi River.
It was the first major loss suffered by the Confederates in Louisiana.
It was one of the shortest invasions in the war and lasted only a day.
World War Iwas like no other war because both sides used new inventions such as deadly poison gas, heavily armed vehicles called tanks, and machine guns that could fire 600 bullets a minute.
true
false
answer asap
Answer: many people died in the war. People didn’t have food didn’t know we’re to hide the war is dangerous
Explanation:
why was the prospect of a two front war problematic from Germany?
Answer:
In 1939, German Chancellor Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, premier of what was then the Soviet Union, signed a non-aggression pact. In essence it declared that they wouldn't make war on each other even though the two dictators had different ideologies and Hitler disliked Stalin.
Explanation:
A non-aggression agreement was signed in 1939 by German Chancellor Adolf Hitler and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin. It basically stated that they would not go to war with each other, despite the fact that the two dictators held opposing ideologies and that Hitler detested Stalin.
Why did Germany face a two-front war?As a result of the pressure of a war of attrition on two fronts, which was accelerated by a surge of resistance and partisan groups in virtually every occupied country, Germany, which lacked the resources for a long war, failed to achieve a quick victory in the east. As a result of massive material warfare, Allied strategic bombing, and fuel and raw material shortages, the German offensive and Blitzkrieg tactics were unable to continue.
Production output was reduced, casualty replacements decreased, and both of these factors contributed to a decrease in overall production output. On the other hand, the inevitable total military defeat of Germany was brought about by steadily improving Allied cooperative warfare based on an exponentially growing war industry.
Learn more about two front war here:
https://brainly.com/question/21514768
#SPJ2
ok i have a couple of questions about the protestant reformation:
-what is the protestant Reformation?
-Who was in charge of the Christian Church (I'm pretty sure it was the pope but Im not 100% sure)
-What invention from the Renaissance enabled Martin Luther to spread his message and become powerful?(I think its the printing press but again not 100% sure)
-Many believed the Pope was the ultimate spiritual authority. What was Martin Luther's opinion on this?(be specific)
The person in charge of the the Christan Church was Pope Paul III. Martian Luther believed that the pope was using his power for personal gain. The pope would allow people to buy their way out of sin and use the money for themselves.
Sorry i could help with all questions.
tbyhnjmkmhgyedrcttvbhnjjjmkkkgyjn
What became the capital of the Roman Empire under Constantine I?
Athens
Rome
Constantinople
Jerusalem
Answer:
Constantinople
Explanation:
Answer these two please and only correct answers
Answer:
1. True
2. C
Explanation:
Example of student-written caption: This is an image of Machu Picchu. It has stone walls. The Incas were skilled stoneworkers. They built temples and walls with smooth, cut stones. The stones fit together so well that they did not need any mortar to hold them together.
Requirements: Write a three to five sentence caption for the following six images. Don’t forget that your caption should:
1. Name and describe the image
2. Explain how the image shows the Inca’s contribution to civilization
Make sure to label each of your captions in your file that you send to your instructor. It should look like similar to this example.
Image #1 Social Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #2 Political Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #3 Religious Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #4 Intellectual Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #5 Technological Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #6 Economical Contribution: (Your caption)
You are a historian, summarize 2020 for a future American History textbook.
Answer:
2020 was a interesting year everything was fine but when coved 19 hit everything changed restaurants where shutting down people had to ware mask every ware supplies at the store where limited your could only get so many of each thing at once u could only have a certain amount of people in your house to keep u safe from the virus a lot of people old and young where dying from the virus it was really sad and made a lot of people lonely cause they lost friends relatives and even pets 2020 was definitely a crazy year and i honestly hope nothing like this ever happens again
Explanation: can i have brainiest plz?
explain where the Dakota villages of Big Eagle, Shakopee, and Little Crow were located in 1862.
Answer:
Minnesota
Explanation:
This is for my sister she is begging me to help and I dont want to so can yall help a sista out?
Why did some missions use force when interacting with Native Americans?
A. To integrate them into Spanish culture
B. to share meal with them
C. to show off their power
D. to teach them how to build houses
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Answer:
ima say A or C but i would say C bc showing off the fact that they can overpower he native americans i think was the whole point...
Explanation:
3. How did the rise of Italian city-states help lead to the Renaissance?
Answer:
The wealth of the Italian city-state played an important role in the Renaissance. This wealth allowed prominent families to support artists, scientists, and philosophers spurring on new ideas and artistic movements. Florence is where the Renaissance first began. you can try this.
Explanation:
HHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Who was crowned the first czar of Russia?
Ivan the Terrible
Romanov
Stalin
Peter the Great
Answer: ivan the terrible
Explanation:
Answer:
ivan the terrible
Explanation:
How do you think the location of Monte Albán helped the Zapotec defend themselves from their enemies?
Answer:
Why do you think the Olmec and Zapotec civilizations developed along coastal areas
For fertile soil, fishing, and less active low lands
Explanation:
People often raise defenses in wars. How the location of Monte Alban helped the Zapotec defend themselves from their enemies is that;
It was situated at the top of a mountain which help them to see their enemies before they attack.Monte AlbanThis is known as a very High place atop a mountain, it is the center of the Oaxaca Valley, the Zapotec were known to have built this as the first real urban center in the America.
It is important as the location helped the Zapotec defend themselves against all their enemies
The city's rulers were known to have leveled the top of the mountain and they created or build pyramids, palaces, etc.
Learn more about Monte Alban from
https://brainly.com/question/1983538
Why did the South prove to be more difficult to conquer than the British expected?
Answer:
There were multiple reasons, and most of them were really just because the British failed to take control. (More in the explanation.)
Explanation:
The British assumed that they had loyalty among their numbers, traitors were active. The British failure to deploy sufficient forces to take control of the South.
The Constitution gave special protection to minority rights. Why?
A. Because the need for all rights to be looked after in a majority rule system
B. Because of the need for the consent of the governed
C. Because the minority usually loses the right to vote
D. Because this is how a representative government works
Answer:
The answer for this question is A
The government cannot deprive you of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law. What amendment is that?
Answer:
The 4th
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment bars the government from unreasonable search and seizure of an individual or their private property.
True or False? Not every American agreed with the war, and many protested the expansionist action. (talking about Us in the mexican war)
This is true. Not every American was in agreement with the war and the expansionist strategy.
The war in this question was the Mexican-American war. The democrats that were mostly living in the southwest were in agreement with the war. They supported it.
But the people that were in opposition to the war were the Whigs. These people condemned the war and also discouraged the land-grabbing ideas of the US. The regarded the war as a conscienceless effort by the United State.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/20474525?referrer=searchResults
Why did the American student Adichie spoke to think all African men were physically abusive like the father in Adichie's book?
The student hadn't actually read the book.
The student had travelled to Africa and experienced this herself.
The student had previously had a single story about African men until reading Adichie's book.
Physical abuse fit with the student's single story about Africans.
Answer:
I think its C.
Explanation:
I don't really know because there wasn't enough context, but that's what I can infer.
Answer:
The student had travelled to Africa and experienced this herself
Explanation:
According to Washington, what is the condition of the army
Answer:
According to Washington, the condition of the army is intolerable.
Explanation:
The circumstance of the Officers of these Corps is completely intolerable. Except if something viable should be possible to make it increasingly agreeable, it is unthinkable they can stay in the administration.
The goals of Congress for making them part of the State Quotas has rather been a drawback, than a favorable position.
It has had an exceptionally incomplete activity, and the advantage coming about to a couple has just served to build up a complexity that disenthralls the sufferings of the rest.
