Answer:
John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth were relatives. To the public, John would very well appear superior, as he's been holding his mission out before Jesus, but he recognizes that he is nothing greater than human.
What are the CONS of cultural preservation on the regional development of a country
Answer:
One of the drawbacks is the high cost associated with preservation of cultural resources. The other drawback discussed in the essay is that preservation of cultural resources hinder development. The final drawback discussed is that of over- commercialization of culture.
importance of critical listening
Answer:
is as important to listen critically as it is to read critically. Critical listening is a process for understanding what is said and evaluating, judging, and forming an opinion on what you hear.
Which act of Congress prevents monopolies?
Answer:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
Explanation:
Answer:
Sherman Antitrust Act
Which of the following locations would be expected to have the most hours of sunlight on January 15, 2021? A. 50°N 20°E B. 10°N 100°E C. 10°S 100°W D. 50°S 20°W
Answer:100^w
Explanation:
Why was the result of the election of 1876 controversial?
A)An election commission, not the popular or electoral vote, decided the election.
B)Hayes won the majority of electoral votes, but Tilden won the popular vote.
C)The Supreme Court decided the election after one state’s results were unclear.
D)Tilden won the popular and electoral votes, but Congress decided to elect Hayes.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
In the presidential election of 1876, Democrat Samuel Tilden ran against Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. At the end of election day, no clear winner emerged because the outcomes in South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana were unclear. Both parties claimed victory in those states, but Republican-controlled “returning” boards would determine the official electoral votes.
Republicans and Democrats rushed to those three states to watch and try to influence the counting of the votes. The returning boards determined which votes to count and could throw out votes, if they deemed them fraudulent. The returning boards in all three states argued that fraud, intimidation, and violence in certain districts invalidated votes, and they threw out enough Democratic votes for Hayes to win. All three returning boards awarded their states’ electoral votes to Hayes
A small child has fallen, resulting in a laceration on the upper lip. Which of the following cranial nerves is responsible for the pain?
a. CNN
b. CN IV
c. CN VII
d. CNV
Answer:
D. Cn v
Explanation:
The cranial nerve v is also called the trigeminal nerve. This nerve has to do with sensational feelings and motor functions that is around the face area as well as the mouth.
In answer to this question, the pain this child feels due to the laceration on his lip is due to the cranial nerve v.
Cranial nerves are responsible for the pain when a small child has fallen, which results in a laceration of the cranial upper lip.
What is the trigeminal nerve? The full form of the word is nerve is the cranial nerve and also called the trigeminal nerve.This is the fifth out of twelve pairs of cranial nerves that are responsible for communicating numerous motor, sensory, and autonomous inputs to constructions of the head and neck.While the trigeminal nerve is largely a receptive nerve, it also mingles in the domain of motor supply.The trigeminal nerve is a nerve that is liable for sense impressions in the face and motor functions such as biting and chewing, and it is the most complex of the cranial nerves.Therefore, option [D] is correct.
Learn more about the trigeminal nerve, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/7156611
how does iliteracy affect society
Answer:
hope it helps
Explanation:
illiterate adults experience poorer health outcomes, less financial security, and lower life expectancies compared to the overall population. Literacy, which conceptually encompasses far more than the ability to read, has become increasingly important as our society becomes ever more dependent on technology.
name and explain two laws that protect citizens against human rights violation
Answer:
Article 2 protects your right to life
Article 2 of the Human Rights Act protects your right to life.
This means that nobody, including the Government, can try to end your life. It also means the Government should take appropriate measures to safeguard life by making laws to protect you and, in some circumstances, by taking steps to protect you if your life is at risk.
Public authorities should also consider your right to life when making decisions that might put you in danger or that affect your life expectancy.
If a member of your family dies in circumstances that involve the state, you may have the right to an investigation. The state is also required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody.
The courts have decided that the right to life does not include a right to die.
Separately, Protocol 13, Article 1 of the Human Rights Act makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.
Are there any restrictions to this right?
Article 2 is often referred to as an ‘absolute right’. These are rights that can never be interfered with by the state. There are situations, however, when it does not apply.
For example, a person’s right to life is not breached if they die when a public authority (such as the police) uses necessary force to:
stop them carrying out unlawful violence
make a lawful arrest
stop them escaping lawful detainment, and
stop a riot or uprising.
Of course, even in these circumstances, the force used must be essential and strictly proportionate. Force is ‘proportionate’ when it is appropriate and no more than necessary to address the problem concerned.
The positive obligation on the state to protect a person’s life is not absolute. Due to limited resources, the state might not always be able fulfil this obligation. This could mean, for example, that the state does not have to provide life-saving drugs to everyone in all circumstances.
Using this right – example
A social worker from the domestic violence team in a local authority used human rights arguments to get new accommodation for a woman and her family at risk of serious harm from a violent ex-partner. She based her case on the local authority’s obligation to protect the family’s right to life and the right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way.
(Example provided by the British Institute of Human Rights)
What the law says
This text is taken directly from the Human Rights Act.
Article 2: Right to life
1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which the penalty is provided by law.
2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
in defence of any person from unlawful violence
in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained, and
in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.
Note: See Article 1 of Protocol 13 for the wording in the Act that makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.
Example case: Pretty v United Kingdom [2002]
A woman suffering from an incurable degenerative disease wanted to control when and how she died. To avoid an undignified death, she wanted her husband to help her take her life. She sought assurance that he would not be prosecuted, but the European Court of Human Rights found that the right to life does not create a right to choose death rather than life. It meant there was no right to die at the hands of a third person or with the assistance of a public authority.
Case summary taken from Human rights, human lives: a guide to the Human Rights Act for public authorities, which shares examples and legal case studies that show how human rights work in practice.
What did the Suez Crisis show about power in the Cold War?
· A. Britain was still a superpower.
B. No countries other than the United States had any influence.
C. The United States and the Soviet Union held the balance of power.
D. The UN was the third superpower.
The correct answer is C. The United States and the Soviet Union held the balance of power.
Explanation
The Suez crisis was a military conflict developed in Egypt in 1956. In this conflict, the military alliance formed by the United Kingdom, France, and Israel fought against Egypt supported by the Arab League. This conflict originated because the Egyptian government wanted to nationalize control over the Suez Canal that had been under the control of France and the United Kingdom. For their part, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed this intervention because it threatened their political and economic interests, so the United States requested the withdrawal of the allies, and the Soviet Union threatened to use weapons of mass destruction on the capital cities of England and France. From the above, it can be inferred that in the Suez crisis that the great powers of the moment managed the world under their interests and wanted to keep power balanced between the two of them.
is the government doing enough to ensure that gender based violence protected explain
Answer:
no
Explanation:
they still let the violent people walk free of charges after harming someone. The government is full of misogynists and homophobes. Nobody in the government cares about anyone but themselves
