Answer:
As I sit down to write here amidst the shadows of vine-leaves under the blue sky of southern Italy, it comes to me with a certain quality of astonishment that my participation in these amazing adventures of Mr. Cavor was, after all, the outcome of the purest accident. It might have been any one. I fell into these things at a time when I thought myself removed from the slightest possibility of disturbing experiences. I had gone to Lympne because I had imagined it the most uneventful place in the world. “Here, at any rate,” said I, “I shall find peace and a chance to work!”
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
Answer:
At the earliest opportunity I went to see his house It was large and carelessly furnished; there were no servants other than his three assistants, and his dietary and private life were characterised by a philosophical simplicity. He was a water-drinker, a vegetarian, and all those logical disciplinary things. But the sight of his equipment settled many doubts. It looked like business from cellar to attic—an amazing little place to find in an out-of-the-way village. The ground-floor rooms contained benches and apparatus, the bakehouse and scullery boiler had developed into respectable furnaces, dynamos occupied the cellar, and there was a gasometer in the garden. He showed it to me with all the confiding zest of a man who has been living too much alone. His seclusion was overflowing now in an excess of confidence, and I had the good luck to be the recipient.
The three assistants were creditable specimens of the class of “handy-men” from which they came. Conscientious if unintelligent, strong, civil, and willing. One, Spargus, who did the cooking and all the metal work, had been a sailor; a second, Gibbs, was a joiner; and the third was an ex-jobbing gardener, and now general assistant. They were the merest labourers. All the intelligent work was done by Cavor. Theirs was the darkest ignorance compared even with my muddled impression.
And now, as to the nature of these inquiries. Here, unhappily, comes a grave difficulty. I am no scientific expert, and if I were to attempt to set forth in the highly scientific language of Mr. Cavor the aim to which his experiments tended, I am afraid I should confuse not only the reader but myself, and almost certainly I should make some blunder that would bring upon me the mockery of every up-to-date student of mathematical physics in the countr
The object of Mr. Cavor’s search was a substance that should be “opaque “—he used some other word I have forgotten, but “opaque” conveys the idea—to “all forms of radiant energy.” “Radiant energy,” he made me understand, was anything like light or heat, or those Rontgen Rays there was so much talk about a year or so ago, or the electric waves of Marconi, or gravitation. All these things, he said, radiate out from centres, and act on bodies at a distance, whence comes the term “radiant energy.” Now almost all substances are opaque to some form or other of radiant energy. Glass, for example, is transparent to light, but much less so to heat, so that it is useful as a fire-screen; and alum is transparent to light, but blocks heat completely. A solution of iodine in carbon bisulphide, on the other hand, completely blocks light, but is quite transparent to heat. It will hide a fire from you, but permit all its warmth to reach you. Metals are not only opaque to light and heat, but also to electrical energy, which passes through both iodine solution and glass almost as though they were not interposed. And so on.
Now all known substances are “transparent” to gravitation. You can use screens of various sorts to cut off ous wealth. Of course there is one thing—”
He paused. I stood still.
Explanation:
Do you know this question
Answer:
neither
Explanation:
thats the answer :)
Please help me with this one!!
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
According to the given passage, it is narrated that the future of African-Americans relies on whether they decide to become people of indispensable value to the society.
The narrator, Booker T Washington is of the opinion that one cannot continuously provide value to a society without being appropriately rewarded.
Which of the following best describes an outcome of the 1970s oil crisis in
the United States?
A. International support for free trade agreements reached
historically low levels.
B. The U.S. government increased its investment in researching
alternative fuel sources.
C. Americans increased their fuel use to protest the government's
handling of the crisis.
D. U.S. corporations agreed to strict international emissions
regulations.
Answer:
B. The U.S government increased it's investment in researching alternate fuel resources.
Explanation:
I majored on History
An outcome of the 1970s oil crisis in the United States was an increase in investment in studying alternative fuel sources.
The 1970s oil crisisOPEC oil embargo and the 1979 energy crisis forced America to look for alternative fuel sources.
Power stations run by nuclear in the United States began to grow in America in the 1970s.
America did not want to remain in the fuel from Middle east.
Initiatives were taken to reduce mobile sources of pollutants.
Thus option B is the correct answer.
Learn more about the 1970s oil crisis here:
brainly.com/question/19944299
Is the belief that some acts are always right or always wrong
In what areas of the world did the US gain influence as a result of the Spanish-American War? Europe and Asia the Americas and Africa Asia and the Americas Asia and Africa Mark this and return
Answer:
Asia and the Americas
Explanation:
Wich fact is mentioned in both passages but interpreted differently by the authors
Answer:
Authoritarian leaders maintain tight control over a workplace's resources.
Explanation:
I'm not entirely sure but this is the answer.
Answer:
Authoritarian leaders maintain tight control over a workplace's resources.
Explanation:
For what reason would the French Monarchy censor Enlightenment ideas?
Answer: Because the Enlightenment as a movement sought to take away the primacy of religion and politics.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment as a movement emerged in Europe, primarily France. According to its principles, the Enlightenment advocated views contrary to politics and religion. The ideas of the Enlightenment were based on freedom, nature, and reason. Such views were against the principles of forms of government such as the absolutist monarchy. Hence the political opposition to the Enlightenment movement.
Which best explains why Great Britain, France, and Russia formed the Triple Entente?
They hoped to help each other imperialize Africa and counter the power of the Triple Alliance on that continent.
They feared the rising military power of Germany and sought to counter the power of the Triple Alliance.
They wanted to prevent conflict in the Balkans and convince the Triple Alliance not to interfere in the region.
They sought to surround Germany on two sides and convince the Triple Alliance not to expand its power.
Answer:
They feared the rising military power of Germany and sought to counter the power of the Triple Alliance.
Explanation:
The Triple Alliance, otherwise known as Triple Entente is an agreement reached by Great Britain, France and Russia that they would each remain neutrals in wars between each other and help defend each other when attacked by external forces.
The best explanation as to why Great Britain, France, and Russia formed the Triple Entente was that they feared the growing power of Germany and sought to enter an alliance with each other.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
True or false The victorious Republicans, the Redeemers, claimed to have redeemed the white South from corruption, misgovernment, and northern and black control.
Group of answer choices
Answer: False
Explanation:
Answer me this question you get 40 points soon as possible!!
Answer:
Number 1) The freedom of religion in protected by the first Amendment because Congress cannot prohibited the right to exercise one's religious beliefs. I don't know if I'm supposed to answer 2,3,and 4 but let me know if you need help with them.
Answer:
1. The protection of religious freedom is laid out in the First Amendment, which states that Congress cannot establish a state religion nor prohibit free exercise of religion. ... The Free Exercise Clause gives all Americans the right to practice their religion freely, without interference or persecution by the government.
2. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
3. The establishment clause separates church from state, but not religion from politics or public life. Individual citizens are free to bring their religious convictions into the public arena.
4. it evaluates whether a law or governmental activity violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
Which chivalric values does Gawain display in the excerpt? Check all that apply.
intellectual depth
loyalty to his king
bravery despite danger
physical strength
moral integrity
Answer: loyalty to his king
Explanation:
The chivalric values that Gawain display in the excerpt is being loyal to the king.
He did everything possibly in his capabilities to protect the king at all cost. He was always loyal to King Arthur and he displayed outstanding prowess, and other knights even looked up to him.
Answer:
123
Explanation:
How did the U.S. Army handle the resistance on the southern plains?
Answer:
hope this helps, brainlist? 0w0
Explanation:
The U.S. army retaliated by attacking the camp and killing over 150 people, mostly women and children. ... General Sheridan ordered the U.S. army to destroy the Kiowa and Comanche villages, kill and hang all warriors, and bring back all women and children. The Red River War crushed the resistance on the Southern Plains. During the ensuing Wounded Knee Massacre, fierce fighting broke out and 150 Indians were slaughtered. The battle was the last major conflict between the U.S. government and the Plains Indians. By the early 20 century, the American-Indian Wars had effectively ended, but at great cost.
What effect did the currency of Rome have on the Roman Empire?
Answer:
it dissolved much of romes trade and taxes were high to keep the empire running
Explanation:
hope this helped!
how did imperialism affect some colonies?
a. they built up reserves of gold and silver
b.they gained status with other colonies
c. they could protect their traditional ways
d. they were drained of natural resources
Answer:
d........................
Why did the minoan civilization collapse ?
Answer: it is not very known on why it collapsed but there is one theory stating that there was a volcanic eruption that damaged cities, Minoan trade routes were a destroyed hurting the Crete economically
Explanation:
Answer: 2 theories
Explanation: Some think undersea earthquakes caused huge waves that destroyed Minoan cities. The other theory is that Mycenaeans invaded Crete.
Compare these first-generation New Englanders with their recent English ancestors and with their future New England descendants.
Answer:
First-generation New Englanders where English Puritan Separatists who left England in order to found a colony under their religious conception. They had a very specific view of life and religon, and built many New England institution around those beliefs.
Recent English acestors were either the descendats of those Puritan Separatists, or were people belonging to other religous denominations.
Their future New England descendants would be much more secular, but would maintain several of the insitutions and the traditions that they introduced in the region.
How did European goods impact the lives of native tribes
Answer: Native peoples of America had no immunity to the diseases that European explorers and colonists brought with them. Diseases such as smallpox, influenza, measles, and even chicken pox proved deadly to American Indians.
Explanation: i dont really know, hope this helped
For many Texans, Reconstruction was not over until ___________ and the Radical Republican legislature were no longer in office. a. Andrew Johnson b. Ulysses Grant c. Edmund Davis d. O.M. Roberts Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
a Andrew Johnson
Explanation: I got it right sorry if it´s wrong.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
that is the answer on edge2021
your class is debating whether Prince Henry was a good citizen. A classmate is arguing that he was a good citizen. What evidence can you offer to change this classmates mind about Prince Henry?
Answer: One piece of evidence you can say is how he led an attack on Ceuta. He also had poor generalship.
Explanation: I didn't understand your question a bit, but hopefully this helps you :)
The British royal family includes Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, KCVO. He is the youngest child of King Charles III and Diana, Princess of Wales, who was the monarch's first wife. He comes in at position five in the British throne's line of succession.
Who was Pince Henry?At Wetherby School, Ludgrove School, and Eton College, Harry received his education. He received officer training at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst after spending some of his gap year in Australia and Lesotho. He finished his training to become a troop leader before being commissioned as a cornet into the Blues and Royals, where he temporarily served with his brother William.
He spent more than 10 weeks in Afghanistan's Helmand Province from 2007–2008. In 2012–2013, he went back to Afghanistan for a 20–week Army Air Corps mission. His army service ended in June 2015. In 2014, Harry founded the Invictus Games and continues to serve as its patron. Additionally, he supports a number of other organizations, such as the HALO Trust and Walking With The Wounded.
Learn more about Sussex, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14183459
#SPJ5
1. Why is Cortes' letter a primary source?
2. Is there any information in his letter that he did not actually observe? How do you reconcile this fact with the idea that this is a primary source? Can a document be partially primary and partially secondary? (i.e., written by someone who did not witness the events or experience the emotion?)
3. What can you infer about Cortes’ motives in writing about “the wonders of Tenochtitlan” and the Aztecs? Why did he choose to write about the topics he addressed in this letter? Who is is intended audience, and how might that have influenced the letter?
4. Using Cortes' comments in the first two paragraphs, what assumptions can you make about the wealth of the Aztec state?
5. List three characteristics of the Aztec religion. What religious practice did Cortes attempt to do away with? Do you think that he could have been successful?
Answer:
1. A primary source is something written by somone who was there while something happened. Like a journal. So the letter was a primary source because it was written by Cortes
2. I have never read his letter, but you probably have, so if it has information in it that Cortez did not actually observe, then it's still a primary source, it's just not entirely reliable. I'm pretty sure a document cannot be partially and primarily sourced.
3. I never read the letter, but it's pretty easy to infer things about someone by reading what they wrote. Here is a really weak example: "Jack carried the heavy buckets of water up the hill, making sure not to spill a drop, while Noah watered the flowers along the way. Which would later lead the village to a thirsty death." We can infer that Noah is either not very bright, or doesn't care about the villages water, and jack is a strong, hard working guy.
I believe that King Charles the V was the one who founded Cortes' little expedition, so the letter was probably meant for him, to tell of his travels and what he saw.
4 I haven't read the letter, so I can't answer this one. But maybe send a screenshot of the letter and I can answer some of these a little better
5. The Aztecs were seriously into sacrificing people to the gods. Three of their religious characteristics were: human sacrifice, ritual, Tenochtitlan religion. I'm pretty sure he did do away with those.
I hope this helps!!
Explanation:
1. Since Cortes wrote the letter, it was a primary source of information, because Cortes was involved in the events that he wrote about.
Hernán Cortés wrote five letters to the Emperor Charles V to account for his activities in Mexico (the land of the Aztecs).2. From his letter, there is no information that Cortes did not actually observe.
Based on the above assertion, his letter remains a primary source of information on the Aztecs.It is possible for a document to be partially primary and partially secondary if the writer incorporates the writings of others in his own.3. The main motives that propelled Cortes to write about "the wonders of Tenochtitlan" and the Aztecs were his intention to colonize the area.
Secondly, he discovered that the land was fertile and beaming with valuable minerals, gold and silver.
Thirdly, he was interested in converting the Aztecs to Christianity.
In his letters, his chief intended audience is King Charles V, the Emperor of Spain. Since he was writing to win the king's favor, this might have influenced the topics that he addressed and the way he went about addressing the issues.4. From Cortes' comments, the assumptions about the wealth of the Aztec state can be summarized in the following words: the Aztec land is blessed with natural resources, especially gold and silver.
5. Three characteristics of the Aztec religion are polytheistic; human sacrifices were rift to appease the gods; and all the Aztecs were involved in performing periodic rituals and ceremonies in honor of the gods.
Primarily, Cortes attempted to abolish the polytheistic religion of the Aztecs since he regarded it as idol worshiping.To be successful in doing away with the Aztec religion, Cortes needed to understand the fundamentals of their belief system so that he could easily sway them to Christianity by establishing linkages.Thus, given Cortes attitude towards the Aztecs and how he was regarded as a deity, he was very successful in doing this, enabling them to embrace Catholicism.
Read more about Cortes and the Aztecs at https://brainly.com/question/18550756 and https://brainly.com/question/19109898
President Abraham Lincoln’s plan for Reconstruction
punished Confederates who owned large farms.
issued harsh penalties for Confederate military officers.
required all states to abolish the practice of slavery.
required states to repay their war debts quickly.
Answer: Required all states to abolish the practice of slavery.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln is still celebrated as the greatest president of the United States because of this move. His move is the foundation of democratic principles. During the war, Lincoln issued a Proclamation in which it abolished the institutions of slavery. This practice has intensified even after the end of the conflict in the country. Lincoln did not issue any sanctions because he strived for unity and unification.
what is opportunity cost?
As a result of the 1860 election seven Southern states seceded from the Union to form the Confederacy.
0 True
O False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
In the 1850s, John Brown raided
Harper's Ferry in order to
A. free slaves
B. get weapons
C. kill the president
Answer:
I think is A.
Explanation:
As a response to the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act Brown founded the League of Gileadites, a militant group to prevent the capture of fugitive slaves. The Harper’s Ferry raid His radicalization led him to a plan to recruit an army of 50 to 100 guerrilla fighters to attack slaveholders in Virginia and Maryland.
Which of the following US Supreme Court decisions made this image from American classroom possible throughout the nation
A. Plessy v Ferguson
B. Marbury v Madison
C. Brown v board of Education
D. Texas v Johnson
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Marbury v Madison i got it right on the test
Which major accomplishment was achieved by Cyrus the Great of Persia?
destruction of the temple in Jerusalem
the conquest of Babylonia
the introduction of paper money
development of the first city-state
Answer:
the conquest of Babylonia
Explanation:
Answer:
the conquest of Babylonia
Explanation:
Explain the connection between Bleeding Kansas and the raid on Harpers Ferry.
Explanation:
Bleeding Kansas, (1854–59), small civil war in the United States, fought between proslavery and antislavery advocates for control of the new territory of Kansas under the doctrine of popular sovereignty. Sponsors of the Kansas-Nebraska Act (May 30, 1854) expected its provisions for territorial self-government to arrest the “torrent of fanaticism” that had been dividing the nation regarding the slavery issue. Instead, free-soil forces from the North formed armed emigrant associations to populate Kansas, while proslavery advocates poured over the border from Missouri. Regulating associations and guerrilla bands were formed by each side, and only the intervention of the governor prevented violence in the Wakarusa War, launched in December 1855 over the murder of an antislavery settler.Abolitionist John Brown led anti-slavery fighters in Kansas before his famed raid on Harpers Ferry.
pweeeeeezzzzz help 6)
. Who was King David's most important descendant? btw this is bible
Answer:
David (Hebrew: דָּוִד)[b] is described in the Hebrew Bible as king of the United Monarchy of Israel and Judah.[6][7] In the Books of Samuel, David is a young shepherd who gains fame first as a musician and later by killing the enemy champion Goliath. He becomes a favorite of King Saul and a close friend of Saul's son Jonathan. Worried that David is trying to take his throne, Saul turns on David. After Saul and Jonathan are killed in battle, David is anointed as King. David conquers Jerusalem, taking the Ark of the Covenant into the city, and establishing the kingdom founded by Saul.
2. What countries (at least 2) explored and colonized North America?
Answer:
-France
-Spain
Explanation:
Britain, France, Spain, and the Netherlands established colonies in North America
hope it helped ;)
