Answer:
The answer is C. The united states capital would be moved further south
Explanation:
How did the end of the Vietnam War mark a difference in US foreign policy? A. The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option B. The US required an attack on US soil first before beginning a war C. The US would not get involved in any foreign wars after it D. The US would begin new wars in Southeast Asia to prove its strength
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option: the end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy in that the United States became more hesitant to engage in large-scale military interventions. Option A is the most accurate choice among the given options. The Vietnam War was a costly and divisive conflict for the United States, resulting in significant loss of life and resources without achieving the desired outcomes.
The war had a profound impact on public opinion and eroded the American people's trust in the government's decision-making regarding military engagements. As a result, there was a shift towards a more cautious approach to future military interventions, with a greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions and a reluctance to commit to protracted wars without clear objectives or popular support.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30134989
#SPJ2
Dyess’s book was published when the war was still being fought. Beck and Burgos were interviewed in the 1990s, five decades after the war. How did Dyess’s account of the Bataan Death March differ from Beck’s and Burgos’s accounts? How were the accounts similar? Describe your answer in at least three sentences.
Answer:
Dyess’ account of the Bataan Death March changed into just like Burgos’ and Beck’s money owed with inside the manner they defined the remedy of prisoners of war. The variations lie of their attitude of the Death March, and the timing in their interviews. Dyess changed into capable of offering greater elements because of the activities had been greater currently while he changed into interviewed. Their views range in that Dyess and Beck had the outsider’s factor of view, even as Burgos had the local’s factor of view.
Explanation:
Answer:
the differences in how soon after the Bataan Death March the accounts were given
the different perspectives of the three prisoners
the similarities between the prisoners’ situations
Explanation:
edg 2021
Which of the following was NOT true of the Catholic Church during the
Middle Ages?
A. It was institutionalized throughout Europe by the popes.
B. It promoted tolerance of other religions.
C. Monasteries brought Christianity to masses of peasants.
The Catholic Church during the Middle Ages promoted tolerance of other religions of the following was not true of the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages. The correct option is B.
What was the role of the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages?The Catholic Church existed in both medieval and modern Europe for centuries. Every monarch, princess, knight, serf, and soldier lived and died in the Catholic faith's protective arms. The church was more than just a place of worship and an organization; it was also a way of life.
The concept of tolerance as it is presented in Catholic thought is very straightforward. In essence, it boils down to this: No one should be forced to accept the Catholic faith against his will. Freedom of consent is necessary for respect for the truth.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about the Catholic Church here:
https://brainly.com/question/9046468
#SPJ2
