Answer:
The correct answer is
Explanation:
A) Some of the drones are teacher's.
Hope this helps....
Have a nice day!!!!
The conclusion that follows from none of the runners is a teacher. All of the attendees are runners with absolute certainty is some drones are teachers. Option A is correct.
What is Teacher?A teacher is someone who facilitates pupils' acquisition of information, competence, or virtue through the activity of teaching. They may also be referred to as schoolteachers or educators. Informally, anyone can play the part of a teacher.
Further competent teacher is also a good learner; they observe how their student(s) learn and adjust their instruction as necessary.
However, teachers play a variety of intricate roles that differ from civilization to society and from one educational level to another.
Therefore a skilled teacher can explain and show ideas in many ways for a variety of students with various learning preferences.
Learn more about teacher:
https://brainly.com/question/14071718
#SPJ2
Rebecca has shared details about her relationship with her boss that do not seem to be based in reality. Rebecca becomes very angry when her counselor asks follow-up questions surrounding Rebecca’s romantic relationship with her boss. The counselor may want to consider further investigation of which psychotic-related disorder?
Answer:
The options are
Brief psychotic disorder
Schizoaffective disorder
Delusional disorder
Borderline personality disorder
The answer is Delusional disorder
Delusional disorder is also referred to as a paranoid disorder and it is characterized by individuals losing touch of reality. They aren’t able to differentiate between real life events and imaginations.
Rebecca sharing details about her relationship with her boss which seems not to be based in reality and her ability to answer the follow-up questions means she’s suffering from this psychotic disorder.
If John takes credit for work done on time, but blames his co-workers for his delays, his attitude is reflective of the: 1 point A. fundamental attribution error. B. primacy effect. C. self-fulfilling prophecy. D. self-serving bias. E. projection bias.
Answer:
D. self-serving bias.
Explanation:
A self-serving bias refers to the usual practice of people taking credit for positive things or events while blaming external forces for bad things. Age, community, psychological findings, and more will affect that. It tends to happen widespread across populations. As per the question John takes credit for the work which is finished on time but for the delayed work he blamed his co-workers and therefore his attitude reflects self-serving bias.
Aya is eight months old, and her mother pretends her baby food is a train in order to convince her to eat it. Aya's mother is using a rather creative form of
Answer:
Social influence.
Explanation:
Social influence is the act of an individual trying to conform according to their behavior to meet the requirements of the social environment. This, in simple terms, is when a person tries to act according to the social condition of the situation.
By pretending that her baby food is a train, eight-month-old Ayda's mother is seen making their feeding time more enjoyable and exciting. Instead of the usual "boring" approach of feeding babies, the creative pattern of play-pretend makes it more appealing and intriguing for the young child, which in turn makes it easier for the parents to feed their children successfully.
According to Glaukon in The Ring of the Gyles, people are naturally
Answer:
egocentric.
Explanation:
The Ring of Gyges is a mythical artifact used by Plato in his book entitled 'Republic.' In the story, Glaucon recounts a myth of Gyges. In the myth, there was a shepherd named Gyges who found a ring which makes man invisible on a corpse of a man.
Using the invisibilty power of the ring, Gyges seduced the queen Lydia, made her murder her King, after which Gyges became the King. Through this myth, Glaucon wanted to convey that people are naturally egocentric.
Egocentric can be defined as a disability of overlooking others needs and desires. An egocentric person is self-centered, thinking all about just himself.
Thus the correct answer is egocentric.
In order to speed up Jesus’ death so that it did not conflict with the Sabbath, the Jesus legs were broken at the request of the religious leaders.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Violetta was injured in a bike accident while on a ride with Alfredo, who she knew was intoxicated. A court would regard this as
Answer:
Assumption of the risk
Explanation:
Assumption of the risk is a good defense to recklessness. It is a legal term used to describe when a person is prohibited from recovering damages for an injury that he or she sustained when he or she exposed him/herself willingly to a known danger.
An example is when a person sign a waiver before using a horse in a horse ranch or before entering a motorbike race.
It holds the view that the said individual understand and knows the risks when doing or embarking on a dangerous action and it applies so as to prevent the injured party from holding someone else accountable for their injuries they had sustained for they knew the risk involved.
Which of the following "Progressive Amendments" gave women the right to vote? A. 16th Amendment B. 17th Amendment C. 18th Amendment D. 19th Amendment
Answer:
D. 19th Amendment
Explanation:
Answer:
D. 19th Amendment
Explanation:
The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution was added on August 18th of 1920. The amendment states that no United States citizen can be barred from voting because of their sex. Essentially, it allowed women to vote in addition to the men who had been voting for many years.
Therefore, the answer is D. 19th Amendment
Ger states that Saul spent three years in the Arabian desert being discipled by the resurrected Jesus before returning to Jerusalem for the first time after his conversion.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
The answer is "Option B"
Explanation:
Paul goes up to Jerusalem three years later in the Arab desert and he was the first person, that refers to the Galatians, and went up to Jerusalem for three years to get to understand exactly Peter and stayed for fifteen days with him.
In the given question, we are talking about the saul, but in reality, here is Paul who goes, that's why the given statement is wrong.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
In the book of Galatians in the New Testament of the Holy Bible, Paul narrates how he became a believer and also a preacher for God. He recounts his 'encounter' with God on the way to Damascus, where he got inspired by God and was 'converted' to Christianity.
In Galatians chapter 1: 11-20, Apostle Paul narrates how he got the Gospel that he's preaching was not from anyone except God Himself. After Ananias baptized him in Damascus, Paul (also known as Saul) began to preach about the Gospel immediately in Damascus. And then he spent three years in Arabia before he returned to Jerusalem. Verse 18 says "Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem.."
Climate is not affected by:
Answer:
distance from the sea.
Explanation:
am not sure but hope i helped
Paul asked ________________ to join him in his work at Lystra while on his second missionary journey.
Answer:
Timothy
Explanation:
Paul met Timothy during his second missionary journey and he became Paul's companion and was also a co-worker.
Paul later asked Timothy to join him in his work at Lystra while on his second missionary journey in order to preach the gospel of Christ in this region of the world.
Paul was known to be a preacher of the word. Paul asked Timothy to join him in his work at Lystra while on his second missionary journey.
Lystra was known to be a city in central Anatolia, now Turkey. It occurs about six times in the New Testament.Paul as mentioned in the bible was said to visit Lystra a lot of times aong with Barnabas or Silas. There Paul met a young disciple, Timothy. Timothy was known to joined Paul and his companion in Lystra.
Learn more from
https://brainly.com/question/21937353
True or False. The brain area that is activated when people smell disgusting food is similarly activated when they feel moral disgust in response to a perceived injustice.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that the brain area that is activated when people smell disgusting food is similarly activated when they feel moral disgust in response to a perceived injustice.
The brain area where this is activated is known as Insula (Insular cortex). It's a neural structure that is involved in both physical and moral disgust.
Unpleasant smell, tastes and sighting a disgusting object or situation activate the insula.
The gross domestic product goes up when there is which of the following?
A. A rising unemployment rate
B. More investment in businesses
C. Less government spending
D. A reduction in exports
Answer:
B
Explanation:
took the exam 2021
A student asks why he can't just make "random guesses" rather than "intelligent guesses" when using the guess-and-check problem-solving strategy. What is the correct response to this question?
Answer:
At an average or in terms of probable outcome, Intelligent guesses often leads to the right answer while random guesses often lead to the wrong answer
Explanation:
Guess and Check problem-solving strategy is a form of method or approach to solving problems that individuals or specifically researchers and students can employ to solve mathematical situations by guessing the answer after critical evaluation and analysis have been carried out and then checking that the guess conforms with the conditions of the problem under study.
Therefore, in order to get the right answer or solution to a problem, one has to make intelligent guesses which examining and analyzing each problem and determine important clue statements from the problem, then guess the answer from the critical analysis and evaluation. This often helps or leads the individuals to the right solution.
However, using random guesses is to pick or derived answers randomly, without critically analyzing the problem, which most times leads to wrong answers.
Hence, at an average or in terms of probable outcome, Intelligent guesses often leads to the right answer while random guesses often lead to the wrong answer
A historian is examining religion's role in history. Which question might the
historian ask if she were organizing her study by period.
The answer is attached.
Achievements :)
As a Caucasian in the United States, being reasonably sure you will be dealing with authority figures that are of the same race as you is a result of:
Brandt and Seena are out to dinner. Brandt is unhappy that Seena always complains about the cost of the bill. He wants to confront her by applying win-win problem-solving. Analyze the options below and choose the best one for Brandt to use.
A. I love going out to dinner with you and spending the time together. I know the cost of the bill bothers you, but it bothers me that it is such an issue when we're having such quality time together.
B. I know you always get stressed about the bill. Let's talk about what bothers you.
C. I like to go out with you, but you never think about how your complaints and fuss over the bill affect me.
D. We're going to talk about why the cost of the bill is such a big deal.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
A. I love going out to dinner with you and spending the time together. I know the cost of the bill bothers you, but it bothers me that it is such an issue when we're having such quality time together.
Explanation:
The win-win solution is to let Seena to see to reason that, Brandt having a quality time with her in the restaurant is more paramount and important than the cost of bill which they incured in the restaurant. With time, see would be able to see reasons to this.
(A) USA Patriot Act of 2001 (B) Equal Pay Act of 1963
(C) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (D) Civil Rights Act of 1964
Ms. Ramos has rescheduled Anna's presentation on the new cybersecurity
procedures for later in the week because today Anna is participating in a religious
festival in her local community. Which of the following laws allows Anna to take
the day off without penalty?
Ms. Ramos has had a complaint filed by Tina, who has been working in the same
position as Jose for the last three years. Tina believes that Jose makes more money
that she does. Which of the following laws allows Tina to file her formal complaint
without penalty?
Ms. Ramos has asked Peter, an IT specialist, to run the recent request by the
federal government for email and cloud storage data for specific individuals.
Which of the following laws allows Ms. Ramos and Peter to access that
information without being arrested?
Ms. Ramos approved Marshall's request for new screen reader software to be
installed on his computer because of a visual impairment. Which of the following
laws requires Ms. Ramos to install the new screen reader software?
Answer:
1. Civil Rights Act 1964
2. Equal Pay Act 1963
3. USA Patriot Act of 2001
4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Explanation:
1. Civil Rights Act of 1964
Civil Rights Act of 1964 is civil rights and labor law in US, that prohibits or forbids any form of discrimination related to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Hence, in this case, since Anna is participating in a religious festival in her local community, Civil Rights Act of 1964 allows Anna to take the day off without penalty
2. Equal Pay Act of 1963
Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a US labor law, whose purpose is to stop or remove the wage differences based on sex. It is considered to have amended the Fair Labor Standard Act.
Hence, in this case, since Tina, a female, believes that Jose, a male, makes more money than she does, Equal Pay Act of 1963 allows Tina to file her formal complaint without penalty.
3. USA Patriot Act of 2001
USA Patriot Act of 2001 is a US anti-terrorism law in which one of its provision is expanding the abilities of law enforcement to surveil, including by tapping domestic and international phones.
Hence, in this case, since the federal government made a request to run the email and cloud storage data for specific individuals. USA Patriot Act of 2001 allows Ms. Ramos and Peter to access that information without being arrested.
4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or ADA is a civil rights law that forbids any form of discrimination based on disability in all areas of public life, such as jobs, schools, transportation, etc.
Hence, in this case, since Marshall's request for new screen reader software to be installed on his computer because of a visual impairment is related to Disabilities, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, allows Ms. Ramos to install the new screen reader software.
"In classical conditioning, as in telling a good joke, timing is critical." By this, we mean that the ________must be presented ________.
Answer:
1. CS and UCS 2. closely enough in time to be perceived as related
Explanation:
Classical conditioning is a process of learning through association in which two separate stimuli are paired/linked together which produces a new learned response.
For example:
Food: Is an unconditioned stimulus that produces an unconditioned response of salivation in dogs.
A bell: Is a previously neutral stimulus that when paired with the unconditioned stimulus it ends up becoming a conditioned stimulus.
In conclusion, the correct answer is: 1. CS and UCS 2. closely enough in time to be perceived as related.
In response to the "Heinz dilemma," Ruby explains, "It doesn't make sense to put respect for property above respect for life itself. Respect for human life is absolute." Ruby is at which of Kohlberg's stages of moral development?
A) Stage 3, the "good-boy-good-girl" orientation
B) Stage 4, the social-order-maintaining orientation
C) Stage 5, the social contract orientation
D) Stage 6, the universal ethical principle orientation
Answer:
Option D: Stage 6, the universal ethical principle orientation
Explanation:
Moral development can simply be defined as the changes in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors regarding standards of right and wrong.
Lawrence Kohlberg's "Heinz" Dilemma centers on the fact that it is the way an individual reasons about dilemma that determine moral maturity. it has six stages according to Kohlberg's.
The stage six is characterized by individuals develop a moral standard based on universal human rights. it centers on the fact that person has developed independent moral code based on universal principles that is equality of human rights, respect for the dignity of each human being, right or good behavior is commitment to these self-chosen ethical principles that reflect universal principles of justice and lastly when laws violate these principles and the person should act in line with these universal principles rather than the law.
According to Jung, the deepest, impersonal layer of the unconscious mind that is shared by all humans is called the
Answer:
collective unconscious
Explanation:
The collective unconscious is an idea originated by psychologist Carl Jung, also called the objective psyche or autonomous psyche today. The collective unconscious suggests that the deepest part of unconscious mind in humans is shared by all equally, inherited and not influenced by personal experience. This idea is differentiated from the personal unconscious mind of Freud's psychoanalysis and is much broader. According to Carl Jung, the collective unconscious is made up of human instincts and archetypes(universal symbols) and experiences only bring meaning to them
The New Testament begins with the first coming of Christ and ends with the promise of His Second Coming.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
What aspects of psychodynamic theory do you think still have relevance in today’s world? Was there one neo-Freudian whose theory appealed to you, and if so, why?
Answer:
The aspect of the psychodynamic theory that I think still has relevance today is metatheory.
The neo-Freudian theory that appeals to me is basic anxiety as theorized by Karen Horney. It appeals to me because the theory gave three options for someone suffering from basic anxiety which is moving towards others, moving against others, and moving away from others.
Explanation:
Psychodynamic theory is an approach to psychology that studies the forces that control experience and how they could affect a person's early life. This approach placed too much importance on psychological factors while ignoring biological influence on a person's mental health.
neo-Freudians believe in the work of Sigmund Freud but deviate from his focus on the effects of sex to emphasize on social environment and culture.
Methatheory is a part of psychodynamic theory that i believe is still relevant today, Karen Horney's basic anxiety hypothesis is aeon-Freudian idea that appeals to me.
Psychodynamic theory is a branch of psychology that investigates the forces that shape experience and how they could influence a person's early years. This approach overemphasized psychological aspects while overlooking biological influences on a person's mental health. Sigmund Freud's work is revered by neo-Freudians, who focus on the social environment and culture rather than the impacts of sex.
To know more about psychodynamic theory, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16524508
The excerpt is from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
–Article 2,
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
This passage from the declaration is designed to
ensure human rights for United Nations members.
explain how human rights violators will be punished.
protect human rights of all people in the world.
grant human rights to the world’s most powerful people.
Answer:
protect human rights of all people in the world.
Answer:
C) protect human rights of all people in the world.
Explanation:
"When asked how they felt 10 years ago regarding marijuana issues, people recalled attitudes closer to their current views than to those they actually reported a decade earlier. This best illustrates"
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
When asked how they felt 10 years ago regarding marijuana issues, people recalled attitudes closer to their current views than to those they actually reported a decade earlier. This best illustrates memory construction.
This happens when people try to remember situations that happened in the past. They try to construct new memories from past references. When they bring up new memories, people are reconstructing the past. Of course, it is probable that during this action, people modify some things or alter the facts. So what they remember is not 100% true of how things happened.
Hume argues that these things are fundamental to our daily experience that no sane person could possibly doubt them, yet they are completely without justification:________.
a. Principle of universal causation
b. Principle of induction
c. Belief in the external world
d. All of the above
Answer:
Correct Answer:
b. Principle of induction
Explanation:
This was from his works on The Principle of Induction. The original problem of induction can be simply put, It concerns the support or justification of inductive methods; methods that predict or infer, in Hume's words, that “instances of which we have had no experience resemble those of which we have had experience.
The excerpt written is from David Hume's Principle of induction.
Basically, a principle of induction refers to a truth which is not presumed at the outset that the appearance are real or illusory.
David Hume was a Scottish philosopher known for his number of philosophical empiricism and skepticism.
When he argued that "things are fundamental to our daily experience that no sane person could possibly doubt them, yet they are completely without justification", the excerpt is from his Principle of induction
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about David Hume
brainly.com/question/21783574
Please formalize the argument seen in the following passage:
look round the world: contemplate the whole and every part of it: you will find it to be nothing but one great machine, subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines, which again admit of subdivisions to a degree beyond what human senses and faculties can trace and explain. all these various machines, and even their most minute parts, are adjusted to each other with an accuracy which ravishes into admiration all men who have ever contemplated them. the curious adapting of means to ends, throughout all nature, resembles exactly, though it much exceeds, the productions of human contrivance; of human designs, thought, wisdom, and intelligence. since, therefore, the effects resemble each other, we are led to infer, by all the rules of analogy, that the causes also resemble; and that the author of nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man, though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work which he has executed. by this argument a posteriori, and by this argument alone, do we prove at once the existence of a deity, and his similarity to human mind and intelligence
Answer:
This is an analogical argument. Following is its representation:
1. Machines and world are quite similar in their minute parts are adjusted with accuracy to each other and there is adopting means to ends.
2. Machines are product of the human minds.
3. The world is a design by something similar to a human mind.
Explanation:
This is an analogical argument. Following is its representation:
1. Machines and world are quite similar in their minute parts are adjusted with accuracy to each other and there is adopting means to ends.
2. Machines are product of the human minds.
3. The world is a design by something similar to a human mind.
The strength of the analogical argument mainly depends on the relevance of the shared properties of the targeted properties.
Im a male teacher, and one of my students (which is a girl who is fifteen/sixteen) keeps staring at me when I’m in the hallway/corridor walking to my lessons and I’m not sure what I should think?
Does anyone know why a student would be staring at me?
Answer: She may want to grab your attention to talk about something or something referring to the lessons in class. If not try asking her why she does it. If its neither then i advise you to inform the principal to find out what's going on.
Answer: If a student is staring during a lecture, there are a few possibilities to consider:
1. She may be visually impaired
2. She may be hearing impaired
3. She may have ADD or ADHD
4. She may be on the ASD spectrum
5. She may have other learning/cognitive disabilities
There are many issues (including above) in which young people don't know how to appropriately act in public situations. Someone who "stares" during a lecture, either doesn't know how to maintain an "interested" look without being "creepy," or has an attention issue and they are trying to focus.
while listening to your aging instructor, you are also trying to look at the overheads and take notes. this is an example of
Answer:
divided attention
Explanation:
Divided attention is a high skill when you perform do two or more tasks at the same time and need attention to perform two or all tasks. it mean you are not fully focused on work, but on different things, because you are divided into anything. When people have to do more than one task at a time, performance on at least one task often declines. It is generally accepted that humans have a limited capacity to process information. When multiple tasks must be performed at the same time, the demand for the tasks may exceed the processing capacity.Match the followings with each others.
1. Unicameral Legislature
2. The Constitution
3. Articles of Confederation
4. Federal judiciary established
a. representative elected by popular vote
b. Constitution
c. States authorized to equip warship to counter piracy
d. Articles of Confederation
Answer:
1=D
2=A
3=B
4=C
Explaination:
Which of the following is an example of a sanction?
A.) Prison sentence
B.) Pay raise
C.) Getting fires
D.) All of the above
Answer:
Hey there!
All of these are Sanctions!
Let me know if this helps :)
