The author relies on the false premise in this quote that parents will sell their children instead of being responsible for them. The C option would be the response to this.
Jonathan Swift wrote and published an article in the year 1729 that was a modest proposition. A Juvenalian sarcastic essay, to be precise. This article makes the argument that poor Irish people at the time may have sold their children to wealthy gentlemen and women as food, and it also demonstrates how ruthless British policy was against the Irish as well as the poor.
This article is generally recognized as a superb example in the field of literature and it established precedent as the sustained irony in the English Language's history.
Complete question:
Which false premise does the author rely on in this excerpt?
A - that parents would choose to disown their children instead of caring for them
B - that parents would value their children over an improved economy
C - that parents would rather sell their children than be responsible for them
D - that parents would prefer to provide for their children instead of selling them
To learn more about modest proposal
https://brainly.com/question/29552934
#SPJ4
What are some characteristics of early Harappan cities in Indus Valley and Saraswati Valley?
Indus Valley Civilization also known as Saraswati civilization has characteristics such as urban planning, a technical and political process concerned with the use of land and design of the urban environment.
What is Indus valley civilization?The Indus Valley Civilisation also known as Saraswati civilisation was a Bronze Age civilisation in the northwestern regions of South Asia. It lasted from 3300 BCE to 1300 BCE and in its mature form 2600 BCE to 1900 BCE.
It was one of three early civilisations of the Near East and South Asia, and of the three, the most widespread. The characteristics of the cities of the ancient Indus were known for their urban planning, baked brick houses, drainage systems, and water supply systems.
It was known for its clusters of large non-residential buildings and techniques of handicraft and metallurgy.
Learn more about Indus, here:
https://brainly.com/question/21116968
#SPJ1
why were some serbians upset with austria hungary
Some Serbians were upset because, Austria-Hungary had seized control of Bosnia, and dominated Serbia.
Austria-Hungary's occupation of a part of the Bosnian Empire in 1908, caused an economic crisis in Bosnia, which ultimately caused their downfall. Later, Austria-Hungary pressed farther onto Serb land.
Because both Serbia and Bosnia were formerly a part of the Ottoman Empire, they enjoyed a particularly tight relationship. Both Serbia and Bosnia shared their anger towards the same enemy. Both countries wanted independence, thus They decided to unite in opposition against Austria- Hungary's armies.
Eventually, The German declaration of war, put an end to the Austro-Serbian war. The Austro-Hungarian army was required to give up its preparations to conquer Serbia following the conditions of the military agreement between Germany and Austria-Hungary.
To learn more about, Austria-Hungary click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6034474
#SPJ4
How did the Dred Scott decision affect the election?
The Dred Scott decision had brought the North and South together against the South and helped Abraham Lincoln to win the election in 1860.
Black people should never be allowed to reside in the United States, the Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857. Conflicts between the North and the South were exacerbated by the Dred Scott rulings, which was a major factor in the election between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas for a seat in the Illinois Senate.
The Dred Scott ruling damaged Douglas and the more moderate Northern leaders. Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans were able to capture the White House because to this as well as the division within the Democratic Party.
Know more about Dred Scott decision here
https://brainly.com/question/23987166
#SPJ4
what kind of conquering force were the Mongols
Answer: A large military/powerful fighting force.
Explanation: They conquered China, terrorized Eastern Europeans, and also attacked Mamluks in Egypt.
Kipling’s poem adheres to the theory of Social Darwinism. How did Social Darwinist’s confirm its validity through Imperialism?
A
Races that were not white Europeans were scientifically confirmed as genetically inferior
B
Races of white Europeans were able to dominate “lesser” people, therefore white Europeans were the dominant members of the species
C
Charles Darwin’s research confirmed the results of Social Darwinism
D
Europeans confirmed that expanding into different territories led to stronger democracy
The legitimacy of social Darwinism is demonstrated by imperialism. White Europeans were the dominant members of the species because they could rule over "lesser" races of humans. Thus option (B) is correct.
What is social?Referring to extracurricular activities that take place when you're not working and where you interact with others: When I was in college, I was very social. pertaining to human society, individual-group interaction, or the well-being of people as members of society
Darwinists adhere to the "survival of the fittest" theory, which holds that certain people advance in power in society because they are inherently superior to others. Over the past 150 years, social Darwinism has been invoked at various points to support racism, eugenics, imperialism, and other forms of injustice.
Therefore, Thus option (B) is correct.
Learn more about social here:
https://brainly.com/question/28218484
#SPJ1
Squanto was a Wampanoag man. What happened to him? [ I'll mark as brainlist].
Well.
Who was Squanto’s Family? Tisquantum is Squanto's birth name, but he has also been known as Squantum throughout history. He was given the name Squanto by the English colonizers. There is no proof of Squanto's Native American ancestry. The Patuxet, Squanto's band or tribe, lived along the coast west of Cape Cod Bay. An English trader was told by Squanto that there were once 2,000 Patuxet. They spoke an Eastern Algonquian dialect that was widespread among populations as far west as Narragansett Bay.
When Squanto was a small child, a Spanish man by the name of Captain George Weymouth abducted him. Squanto traveled to England with George. Living with Ferdinando Gorges was Squanto. He was raised by Ferdinando until he went back to America.
Around 1585, Squanto was born on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. He was a member of the Wampanoag Confederation's Patuxet tribe. In 1605, Captain George Weymouth, who was surveying the region, managed to catch Squanto along the shore of what is now Maine. Squanto and four other Penobscot Indians were transported to England by Weymouth. Squanto resided in England with Ferdinando Gorges, who also served as his English teacher. Gorges later employed Squanto to serve as his guide and interpreter. Squanto came back to serve as John Smith's guide to North America. Thomas Hunt, John Smith's lieutenant, abducted Squanto once more. He was bought as a slave in Spain, but he finally freed himself and went to a convent, where he spent several years.
Squanto returned to North America in 1619 on one of John Smith's ships after persuading the monks to allow him to do so, only to find that the majority of the Patuxet had perished in an epidemic the year before. Squanto was presented to the Plymouth Pilgrims by a Wampanoag Chief who had come to the area where his community had formerly been. Squanto is credited with teaching the Pilgrims how to grow maize using the indigenous practice of burying fish as fertilizer, which is thought to have assisted them in recovering from a particularly difficult winter.
Squanto was married in 1798.
When Squanto was dispatched on a trip to acquire intelligence for Governor William Bradford, he was once more abducted by the Wampanoag. Ten settlers from the Plymouth colony went to save Squanto. He was located and returned to the Plymouth Pilgrims, who welcomed him with open arms. Squanto embarked on diplomatic trips to resolve the conflict between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims while continuing to assist the colonists. Squanto developed a fever after leaving a conference with the Wampanoag and returning to Plymouth. Historiographers assume that the Wampanoag poisoned him because they thought he had been unfaithful. A few days later, in Chatham, Massachusetts, in November 1622, Squanto passed away. He was laid to rest in Plymouth's Burial Hill cemetery in an unmarked burial.
He is said to be interred in an unmarked grave, maybe at a cemetery for pilgrims. Peace was maintained between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims for another fifty years as a result of Squanto's legacy.
Squanto was seized by Captain George Weymouth in 1605, and he transported him to England to study the language. In 1614, Squanto traveled back to the New World with John Smith. He was taken in 1614 by English adventurer Thomas Hunt, who later sold him to Spain as a slave. Squanto had fled and returned to America by 1619.
Thank you,
Eddie
BRAINLIEST AND 58 POINTS read the info and drag n drop the corresponding # arrows to the answer in the text
Based on the information in the text, it can be inferred that the answers in the text are: 1. The British were ordered to find the stash and destroy it, 2. William Dawes, 3. British officer demanded that the militia disarm and disperse and in the ensuing confusion, shots were fired.
What is the text about?The text relates the previous events that the rebellious Patriots had to experience before the confrontation against the British militia in Boston. Some important aspects that are mentioned in this text are the strategies that the British and the Patriots had to attack their rivals. For example, the signals with lanterns, the dispersion of the army and the way to take two paths to avoid being captured.
What are the correct answers?To answer the questions correctly, we must read the questions and then read the text carefully, focusing on the questions. After reading the text we are going to identify that the correct answers are:
1. The British marched on Lexington and Concord because they suspected the rebels had a cache of weapons and ammunition.
2. The person who was with Paul Revere was William Dawes.
3. The spark that started the war was the confusion that occurred in the city of Boston in which it is not clear if the rebels clashed with the British or how the confrontation began.
Learn more about Boston Patriots in: https://brainly.com/question/29278126
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 10
What was an argument made by women in the Progressive movement?
O A. They felt that strikes and marches were too public a show of
support.
B. They could best create change by supporting men in public life.
O C. They could best create change by focusing on their home lives.
о D. They had a duty to improve society.
SUBMIT
Answer:
D. They had a duty to improve society.
Explanation:
This was the reason this movement took place in the first place.