Which of the following best describes the relationship between angle a and angle bin the image below?

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

By taking the number "3" and plus together with the number 5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles are x, y and z:

Their sum is:

Then find the other angles:

Now we have to,

find the three angles if one angle is twice smallest angle and third angle is 36° greater than smallest angle.

Then take the values as,

→ smallest angle = x

→ y = 2x

→ z = x + 36°

Let we find the angles,

→ x + y + z = 180°

→ x + 2x + x + 36° = 180°

→ 4x = 180 - 36

→ 4x = 144

→ x = 144/4

→ [x = 36°]

Now the value of y is,

→ y = 2x

→ y = 2 × 36°

→ [y = 72°]

Then the value of z is,

→ z = x + 36°

→ z = 36° + 36°

→ [z = 72°]

Placing values from least to greatest,

→ 36°, 72°, 72°

Hence, the order is 36°, 72°, 72°.

Step-by-step explanation:

0 is the ans my guy

dngjdjvkdkckgkdkgkskfkfkv

Answer:

Mean scores.

Step-by-step explanation:

The golf player will score in the first round, according to these scores the golf player scores can be predicted. The golf player can perform high in first round but he may score lesser in the second round due to stress or mental pressure. The scores can be predicted taking mean of the scores and adding standard deviation to it.

Answer:

is opposite line BC. Answer is letter E.

Complete Question

A few years ago, people tended to have relatively large CD collections. For students at a large university in the midwest, the mean number of CDs owned was 78 with a standard deviation of 90. To confirm these numbers, a random sample of 120 students from this university was collected and the size of their CD collections recorded. These particular 120 students had a mean CD collection size of 80 CDs. What is the numerical value of the sample mean?

Answer:

Sample Mean [tex]\=x=80[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Population Mean [tex]\mu=78[/tex]

Standard deviation [tex]\sigma=90[/tex]

Sample size [tex]n=120[/tex]

Sample Mean [tex]\=x=80[/tex]

Therefore

The numerical value of the sample mean is

Sample Mean [tex]\=x=80[/tex]

Answer:

Q9: x = 27, Q10: x = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

X P(X=x)

0 0.39*0.39*0.39 = 0.059319

1 3*0.61*0.39*0.39 = 0.278343

2 3*0.61*0.61*0.39 = 0.435357

3 0.61*0.61*0.61 = 0.226981

Answer:

How do you mean 6/2%? Clarify it for assistance

Answer:

Simple interest = $ 3,484.00

Step-by-step explanation:

I= P×R×T ÷ 100

The rate is 6 1/2 and I will use the decimal form 6.5,to change that to a whole number we simply move the decimal point one place behind.

Since we moved the decimal point in the numerator we need to do the same for the denominator.Therefore 100 becomes 1000.

13400 × 65 × 4    = $ 3,484.00

        1000

Answer:

it would be 1/4(60)

Step-by-step explanation:

30 percent of 61 is 18.3 and 1/4 of 60 is 15 which is closest to 18.3

Answer:

0.7123 = 71.23% probability that a random sample of 75 detached houses in Franklin County had a mean price greater than $190,000 in 2009.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

The mean price for a detached house in Franklin County, OH in 2009 was $192,723. Suppose we know that the standard deviation was $42,000.

This means that [tex]\mu = 192723, \sigma = 42000[/tex]

Sample of 75:

This means that [tex]n = 75, s = \frac{42000}{\sqrt{75}}[/tex]

What is the probability that a random sample of 75 detached houses in Franklin County had a mean price greater than $190,000 in 2009?

1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 190000. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{190000 - 192723}{\frac{42000}{\sqrt{75}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.56[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.56[/tex] has a p-value of 0.2877

1 - 0.2877 = 0.7123

0.7123 = 71.23% probability that a random sample of 75 detached houses in Franklin County had a mean price greater than $190,000 in 2009.

Answer:

The percentage of people that could be expected to score the same as Matthew or higher on this scale is:

= 93.3%.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Mean score on the scale, μ = 50

Distribution's standard deviation, σ = 10

Matthew scores, x = 65

Calculating the Z-score:

Z-score = (x – μ) / σ

= (65-50)/10

= 1.5

The probability based on a Z-score of 1.5 is 0.93319

Therefore, the percentage of people that could be expected to score the same as Matthew or higher on this scale is 93.3%.

Answer:

4r + 4(r + 3) = 68

r = 7 miles per hour

r + 3 = 10 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

distance = rate * time

a)

4r + 4(r + 3) = 68

Distribute

4r + 4r + 12 = 68

8r + 12 = 68

8r = 56

r = 7 miles per hour

r + 3 = 10 miles per hour

Im sorry if you get this wrong but im going with 14 only because i did this question with my class in school and a boy said 14 and got it right.

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

there are bigger triangles in the triangles pls dont remove

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

2x is an exterior angle

Exterior angles = the sum of the two remote (unconnected - non supplementary interior angles).

Put symbolically

<LEG = <EGF + <EFG

<EFG = 180 - 4x           In this case you need to find the supplemtnt

<LEG = x + 180 - 4x

2x = 180 - 3x                Add 3x to both sides

5x = 180                       Divide by 5

x = 36

Answer:

a. 0.2

b. 0.42

c. 0.7

d. the solution is in the explanation

e. x and y are not independent

Step-by-step explanation:

a. from the joint probability mass function table,

p(x=1) and p(Y= 1)

= p(1,1) = 0.2

b. prob(0,0)+prob(0,1)+prob(1,0)+prob(1,1)

= 0.10 + 0.04 + 0.08 + 0.20

= 0.42

P(X ≤ 1 and Y ≤ 1) = 0.42

c. prob {X ≠ 0 and Y ≠ 0}

= prob(1,1) + prob(1,2) + prob(2,1) + prob(2,2)

= 0.20 + 0.06 + 0.14 + 0.30

= 0.7

d. we have to calculate the marginal pmf of x and y here.

we have the x values as 0,1,2

prob(x=0) = 0.1 + 0.04 + 0.02

= 0.16

prob(x=1) = 0.08 + 0.2 + 0.06

= 0.34

prob(x=2) = 0.06+0.14+0.3

= 0.50

we have y values as 0,1,2

prob(y=0) = .1+.08+.06

= 0.24

prob(y=1) = .04+.2+.14

= 0.38

prob(y = 2) = 0.02+0.06+0.3

= 0.38

P(X ≤ 1) = prob(x=0)+prob(x=1)

= 0.34+0.16

= 0.50

e. from the joint table we have this,

prob(1,1) = 0.2

prob(x=1) = 0.34

prob(y=1) = 0.38

then prob(x=1)*prob(y=1)

= 0.34*0.38

= 0.1292

therefore prob(1,1) is not equal to prob(x=1)*prob(y=1)

0.2≠0.1292

x and y are not independent

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that y varies inversely with x. Recall that inverse variation has the form:

[tex]\displaystyle y=\frac{k}{x}[/tex]

Where k is the constant of variation.

We are given that y = 36 when x = 1/12. Thus:

[tex]\displaystyle (36)=\frac{k}{\left({}^{1}\!/\!{}_{12}\right)}[/tex]

Solve for k. Multiply both sides by 1/12:

[tex]\displaystyle k=\frac{1}{12}(36)=3[/tex]

Hence, our equation is:

[tex]\displaystyle y=\frac{3}{x}[/tex]

Our answer is B.

Answer:

217

Step-by-step explanation:

5425/25 = 217

The images of the graphs are missing and so i have attached them.

Answer:

Graph in option A

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 4^(x) + 3

Let's input some values of x and find the corresponding value of y and see if any of the graph matches the coordinates we get.

At x = 0;

y = 4^(0) + 3

y = 4

At x = 1;

y = 4^(1) + 3

y = 7

At x = 2;

y = 4^(2) + 3

y = 19

Looking at all the graphs, the only one with y = 4 when x = 0 is graph A

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

When we reflect something across the y axis, the y axis stays the same but the x values change by a factor of -1.

B is the Answer

Answer:

c. switch the x-values and y-values in the table

Step-by-step explanation:

For any table or graph reflection over the line y=x

The rule is (x,y) ----> (y,x)

f(x) is reflected over the line y=x, so the coordinates of f(x) becomes

(-2,-31) becomes (-31,-2)

(-1,0) becomes (0,-1)

(1,2) becomes (2,1)

(2,33) becomes (33,2)

As per the rule, we switch the x-values and y-values in the table

For reflection over the line y=x , the coordinate becomes

(-31,-2)

(0,-1)

(2,1)

(33,2)

Based on the height that the wires attach, and the base length of the stakes, the length of the wire is 29 ft.

This can be solved with the Pythagorean theorem because the height can be treated as the height of a right-angled triangle. The base as the base of the triangle.

The length of the wire is the hypothenuse.

Length:
c² = a² + b²

c² = 21² + 20²

c² = 841

c = √841

= 29 ft

Find out more on the Pythagorean theorem at https://brainly.com/question/343682.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Below.

Step-by-step explanation:

log  10  ( 100 )  =  2

Answer:

First one: log_10 (100) = 2 OR log (100) = 2

Second one: 5^-3 = 1/125

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's say the formula for a basic exponent equation is this:

a = b^x

a is the answer when you calculate b^x

b is the base

x is the exponent

Here's the log formula using those variables:

log_b (a) = x

As long as you know how to rearrange the numbers/variables, you are good to go:

100 = 10^2

a = 100

b = 10

x = 2

log_10 (100) = 2

You can also write this one as log (100) = 2 because when you put log by itself, it's assumed that the base thing already equals 10.

log_5 (1/125) = -3

a = 1/125

b = 5

x = -3

5^-3 = 1/125

Hope it helps (●'◡'●)

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.015 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the company's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 47% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 47% or less, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \leq 0.47[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of more than 47%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p > 0.47[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.47 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.47, \sigma = \sqrt{0.47*0.53}[/tex]

A sample of 1300 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

This means that [tex]n = 1300, X = 0.5[/tex]

Value of the statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.5 - 0.47}{\frac{\sqrt{0.47*0.53}}{\sqrt{1300}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 2.17[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.5, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 2.17.

Looking at the z-table, z = 2.17 has a p-value of 0.9850

1 - 0.985 = 0.015

The p-value of the test is 0.015 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the company's claim.

Answer:

[tex] \theta = 4~radians [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] s = \theta r [/tex]

[tex] 20~cm = \theta \times 5~cm [/tex]

[tex] \theta = 4~radians [/tex]

Answer:

[tex]-28xy+35y[/tex]

[tex]GCF ~is~ 7y[/tex]

[tex]=7y(-4+5)[/tex]

The equivalent expression: [tex]7y(-4x+5)[/tex]

-------------------------

hope it helps...

have a great day!!

Answer:

The boat's price before the reduction was $ 29,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that after a 13% price reduction, a boat sold for $ 25,230, to determine what was the boat's price before the reduction, the following calculation must be performed:

100 - 13 = 87

87 = 25230

100 = X

100 x 25 230/87 = X

2523000/87 = X

29000 = X

Therefore, the boat's price before the reduction was $ 29,000.

Answer:

= x^2 + 3 + √3x^2 - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Remove parentheses: (a) = a

= x^2 + 3 + √x . 3x - 1

x . 3x = 3x^2

= x^2 + 3 + √3x^2 - 1