which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?

1)An employer may give an employee a bonus as exchange for him or her not exercising the right to freedom of association.
2)Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unioun.
3)The right of workers to freedom of association is only protected in terms of the constitution.
4)Close shop agreement are unconstitutional as the infringe workers right to freedom of association.​

Answer and Explanation:

A successful leader must be someone who is incorruptible, fair, tolerant and egalitarian, who does his job in a peaceful, correct and progress-promoting way, free from prejudice. The absence of prejudice and the ability to act in a peaceful manner are the main characteristics that a police leader must present. This is because a police leader who has these characteristics serves as an example to other police officers, who can shape their work and behavior to be less violent professionals and who judge people correctly, without considering racism and prejudice.

Within a department, corruption is the most harmful characteristic among legal professionals. This corruption takes away from the sense of fairness that is so essential within a police department. An example of this can be seen in corrupt police officers who facilitate illegal activities of powerful people, but fight and destroy black families and other social minorities based only on prejudice.

Answer:

No

Explanation:

In simple words, every law that is made or corrected is based on the current needs and aspirations of the society. And it is also a big fact that the basic societal structure of any community keeps on changing time by time. Hence, the transformations in corrections will keep on happening as the world keeps moving on.

Law is always enforced by the state in the society it operates

Answer:

The correct answer is B. Companies improve their productivity using money from  investments.

Explanation:

In the capitalist production system, companies require an initial investment of money to be able to produce the goods or services they offer to the market. Thus, this money is used, among other things, for the purchase of inputs, machinery, advertising expenses, etc., aimed at maximizing its returns. Therefore, the more money the company has, the higher its productivity.

Answer:

Companies with poor productivity use investments to become more efficient.

Explanation:

Answer:

I don't think marriage is different than being in love because you want to spend the rest of your life with that person. But I think if the couple breaks up there will be a slight chance to increase the likelihood of criminal involvement because breaking up is an intense emotion to feel

Answer:

Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.

Answer:

Principal and Agent

1. Rights of the Principal:

a. The principal can enforce the various duties of an agent.

b. The principal can recover compensation for any breach of duty by the agent.

c. The principal can forfeit agent’s remuneration where the agent is guilty of misconduct in the agency business.

d. The principal is entitled to any extra profit that the agent has made out of his agency. This includes the illegal gratification of RM500 that Song paid to Gan.

2. Circumstances under which the principal cannot revoke/terminate the authority of his agent are:

a. The agent has performed his authority partially.

b. When the agency is coupled with a legal interest in the agency and the interest has not been realized by the agent or the interest has not expired.

Explanation:

a) Some facts of the case:

Principal = Ram

Agen = Gan

Car dealer = Song

Authority limit for the purchase of the car = RM 75,000

Actual amounted booked for the car by the agent = RM 85,000

Deposit for the car = RM 8,500

Commission received from Song by Gan = RM 500

b) Gan did not actually act in the best interest of his principal, Ram, who gave him limited authority to buy a car at a price not exceeding RM 75,000.  It looks like Gan was more interested in the commission (bribe) that he received from Song instead of performing his duties as an agent to Ram.  If the agency authority is written down, Ram can use it as evidence that Gan's authority was limited.

Answer:

Doctrine of Prior Appropriation

Explanation:

this position requires that property owners obtain permits for use of water.

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

Answer:

Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.

Answer:

Tôi khá chắc chắn là "Được rồi.".

Explanation:

Answer:

Restrictions that would enforce pepopel from wrong doings with the consequences listed.

Explanation:

Answer:

GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu

There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.

1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.

2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer.  We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission.  Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.

3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.

Explanation:

GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed.  One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB.  Was the deal closed because of the extra commission?  Certainly not.

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Since 2018, alcohol has been removed from the list of prohibited substances and is therefore not analyzed in state prisons in most states. However, in cases of driving vehicles in which the driver is under the effect of alcohol, this substance is considered if a prohibited substance test is carried out, as driving under the influence of alcohol is prohibited throughout the country.

Answer:

Forensic lab.

Explanation:

The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) unit transport evidence to the forensic laboratory for the testing of evidences. The physical evidence is collected by Crime Scene Investigators that may include fingerprints, footprints, hair, fibers and other materials that are found at the crime scene and on the victim's body. These evidences are used by the forensic scientist in order to find out the cause as well as the criminal.

Answer:

Only powers specifically given to the government are legal

Explanation:

What results from the federal system of government in the United States is that only powers specifically given to the government are legal

This is because the government of the United States of America is governed by the Constitution which is considered supreme and any power that is not specifically given by the constitution to the government is considered illegal.

Answer:

Search and seizure, practices engaged in by law enforcement officers in order to gain sufficient evidence to ensure the arrest and conviction of an offender. The latitude allowed police and other law enforcement agents in carrying out searches and seizures varies considerably from country to country. There is considerable variance in the amount of protection given to the individual rights of the accused person.

Answer:

i think its d which is b and c

Answer:

d. none of the above

Explanation:

The cost depreciation approach of estimating value is a method of getting the value of real estate by estimating the price a buyer should pay for the property, based on the depreciation factors involved.

Using this approach, the value of the property is equals to the land cost, plus the total costs of construction, minus depreciation.

Therefore, the correct answer is none of the above as the answer is not in the given answer choices.

Answer:

a. True

Explanation:

The Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the legal system which governs all the members of the military of the United States of America. It covers a number of legal issues from the apprehension and the confinement of military personnel to the regulations covering courts of the military appeals.

It defines criminal offenses under military system.

The German Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice has strict laws against road accidents.

Incase of a accident, the drive must stay at the scene. If the driver leaves the scene, a serious criminal offense will be register against him of hit and run. The driver must stay and turn on the emergency flashers and also put up the warning triangle.

Thus the answer is TRUE.

It is A. TRUE that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to soldiers and other members of the armed forces when they are on active duty or on recall to active duty.  It requires that these military personnel do not abandon victims of accidents at the scene.

Even the German law forbids persons from abandoning victims of accidents.

Thus, it is true that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense both under the German law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Learn more about the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at https://brainly.com/question/6545593

Answer:

Analyze the legal structure of the following legal norm:

Any person who manufactures or trades in counterfeit goods being curative or preventive drugs shall be sentenced to between 2 and 7 years of imprisonment.

Excerpt from Clause 1, Article 194 of Vietnam's penal code. Crime of producing and trading in counterfeit goods being curative and preventive drugs.

Explanation:

I don't know the answer but I am helping those people who doesn't understand vetnamese...they could understand this

Answer:

Người nào sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh, thì bị phạt tù từ 02 năm đến 07 năm.

2. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 05 năm đến 12 năm:

a) Có tổ chức;

b) Có tính chất chuyên nghiệp;

c) Tái phạm nguy hiểm;

d) Lợi dụng chức vụ, quyền hạn;

đ) Lợi dụng danh nghĩa cơ quan, tổ chức;

e) Buôn bán qua biên giới;

g) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá từ 150.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;

h) Thu lợi bất chính từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;

i) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể từ 31% đến 60%;

k) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng.

3. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 12 năm đến 20 năm:

a) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá 500.000.000 đồng trở lên;

b) Thu lợi bất chính từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 2.000.000.000 đồng;

c) Làm chết người;

d) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể 61% trở lên;

đ) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này từ 61% đến 121%;

e) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 1.500.000.000 đồng.

4. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù 20 năm, tù chung thân hoặc tử hình:

a) Thu lợi bất chính 2.000.000.000 đồng trở lên;

b) Làm chết 02 người trở lên;

c) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này 122% trở lên;

d) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản 1.500.000.000 đồng trở lên.

5. Người phạm tội còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 20.000.000 đồng đến 100.000.000 đồng, cấm đảm nhiệm chức vụ, cấm hành nghề hoặc làm công việc nhất định từ 01 năm đến 05 năm hoặc tịch thu một phần hoặc toàn bộ tài sản.

6. Pháp nhân thương mại phạm tội quy định tại Điều này, thì bị phạt như sau:

a) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 1 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 1.000.000.000 đồng đến 4.000.000.000 đồng;

b) Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp quy định tại các điểm a, b, c, e, g, h, i và k khoản 2 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 4.000.000.000 đồng đến 9.000.000.000 đồng;

c) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 3 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 9.000.000.000 đồng đến 15.000.000.000 đồng;

d) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 4 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 15.000.000.000 đồng đến 20.000.000.000 đồng hoặc đình chỉ hoạt động có thời hạn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm;

đ) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại Điều 79 của Bộ luật này, thì bị đình chỉ hoạt động vĩnh viễn;

e) Pháp nhân thương mại còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 100.000.000 đồng đến 300.000.000 đồng, cấm kinh doanh, cấm hoạt động trong một số lĩnh vực nhất định hoặc cấm huy động vốn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm.

Answer:

Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.

Explanation:

Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .

Answer:

Is this like a legit question

Answer:

I like the sky bc it can't see me and I can see it but I see red in my eyes and I smoke a lil to much weed

Answer:

Do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.

Explanation: