who wrote about the history of African Americans

Answer:

Nisei

Explanation:

The first generation is Issei, desu is a japanese copula used to connect subjects with predicates, and ossu is a shortened japanese greeting.

Answer:

The correct answer is B. World War I.

Explanation:

A trench warfare is a war in which both sides have dug themselves opposite each other in trenches and other fortified positions, with the aim of halting the advance of the enemy, which culminates in a stalemate where neither side succeeds in breaking through the enemy lines. The best-known trench warfare is World War I.

In general, trench warfare is the result of technological advances that allow enemy soldiers to be killed faster than they can advance. For example, in World War I, repeating rifles, machine guns, and modern artillery made it possible to mow down soldiers in the open by bushes. However, as armies still moved largely on foot and horseback, they could not cross those same open battlefields fast enough to get close enough to the enemy and fire effectively at the enemy.

The correct answer is False

Explanation

The word "subjective" is a concept that refers to the opinion or point of view of a person or group on a specific topic. While the word "objective" is a concept that refers to information or knowledge that does not include the opinion or point of view of its author, but rather focuses on the nature of a specific topic in general and specific. According to the above, the correct answer is false because subjective measures are not numerical or quantifiable but refer to an opinion or point of view and perceptions, while objective measures are not based on someone's perceptions but rather refer to numeric or quantifiable information.

The  statement that explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed is B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

It should be noted that the Catholic Church unified Europe socially through the continuing masses, as well as the holding baptisms and weddings, and caring for the sick.

However the  Catholic Church unified Europe politically  through the process of acting as a unifying "leader" for Christians and it can be considered as a place people could come to for help they needed and the Church would be there, hence considering the case above it brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about Roman Catholic Church at:

https://brainly.com/question/3323129

#SPJ1

missing options:

A. It forced all Eastern Orthodox Christians to respect the pope’s authority.

B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

C. It established the Code of Justinian as the official European legal system.

D. It required that Latin act as the official spoken language throughout Europe.

It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam

Answer:

East Germany had been formed from the area of Germany that the Soviet Union had occupied and so became a Communist state.

West Germany had been formed from the areas that Britain, France and the U.S.A. occupied so became a democratic capitalist state.

West Germany

East Germany

Answer: They demanded that the US withdraw its forces.

Explanation:

Saudi Arabia is home to both Mecca and Medina which are the two holiest places in all of Islam and Islamic groups did not appreciate the fact that the United States, a country they considered unholy and sinful, was so close to such holy sites.

They demanded that the U.S. withdraw their forces and this was one of the reasons cited for Osama Bin Laden planning the 9/11 terror attacks.

Answer:C) They demanded that the US withdraw it forces

Explanation:

Got it right on ed2021

Answer:

I have analayzed. Philippines society was heavily influenced by the Spanish colonization from 1565 to 1898. through those years they introduced Christianity and so the early Filipinos believed in god. Foods was also influenced by the spanish for example Lechon (Spanish dish). It seems that the Spaniards hated the "savage" dishes the Philippines offered to the colonizers, another example of this is the american colonization right after Philippines had a war with the Spanish colonizers. The Americans werw disgusted with the dish adobo and they tried to force people not to cook them anymore. The filipino language is a mix of South-east Asian languages like bahasa Indonesia plus spanish words and accent. The Philippines weren't fully independent until July 4, 1946. After the events of countries trying to colonize The Philippines, the Philippines prospered and became the 2nd richest country in Asia (1900s)Philippines then participated in the basketball olympics and other worldwide committees. Since then, Philippines dropped to a third world country thanks to the overpopulation, corruption and natural disasters. The Philippines is a very interesting and unique country that has Spanish roots and a different culture.

In order to answer this question, here is a guide to help you:

Analysis actually refers to the examination carried out in a detailed way about something. It is actually done in order to provide clarity and understanding for the readers.

When analysing the Philippines, one can examine how they were colonized by the Spanish and the way Christianity was introduced. This made many Filipinos to believe in God.

Learn more about analysis on https://brainly.com/question/890849

Answer:

Their problems were low wages and unsafe working conditions. First, workers formed local unions in single factories. ... Unions were not successful because they did not have enough members, legislators would not pass effective laws, and the courts supported the business owners.

Answer:

URL copied to clipboard

As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.

This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).

In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century.  This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945.  But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.

In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.

Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).

Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.

In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.

On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend.  Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).

This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.

Explanation:

Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.

Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.

Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.

Learn more about authoritarian, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30019371

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

Hello!

cuneiform script

sandals

harpoons

beer

Answer:

I as a person would have started enjoying the little things in life more. The novel in question beautiful depicts the ignorance of society towards the destruction of war and how they pushed many young men to hell in name of patriotic duty.  

I would have started enjoying things like time with family and friends, having a good meal twice a day and of course sanitized rooms and toilets in my place. I would have been less materialistic.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

the answer...............................

Answer:

1. Pagtutulad (simile)  – ginagamit sa paghahambing ng dalawang magkaibang bagay, tao, pangyayari at iba pa. Gumagamit ng mga salitang tulad ng, gaya ng, para ng, kawangis, atbp.

2. Pagwawangis (metaphor) – katulad ng pagtutulad ngunit hindi ito gumagamit ng mga salita gaya ng sa pagtutulad.

3. Pagmamalabis (hyperbole) – lubhang nagpapalabis sa kalagayan ng tao, hayop, bagay at halaman

4. Pagbibigay-katauhan (personification) – pagsasalin ng katangian ng tao sa mga bagay, may buhay man o wala

5. Pagpapalit-tawag (metonymy) – mahabang pangungusap na isang salita lamang ang katumbas

6. Pagpapalit-saklaw (synecdoche)  – maaari dito banggitin ang bahagi bilang pagtukoy sa kabuuan at maaaring isang tao ang kumakatawan sa isang grupo

Explanation:

Answer:

B

They had a duty to improve society.

Explanation:

Women became leaders in a range of social and political movements from 1890 through 1920. This period is known as the Progressive Era. Progressive reformers wanted to end political corruption, improve the lives of individuals, and increase government intervention to protect citizens. Earlier generations discouraged women from participating in public, political movements, society began to embrace female activism in the late nineteenth century. Progressives often argued that women’s politics complemented their traditional roles as wives and mothers, caregivers and keepers of virtue.

Answer:

I thinkthe ans is B

Explanation:

all the best

Answer:

Voters could vote for a constitution with or without slavery (HOWEVER if they voted for a constitution without slavery, slaves that were already in Kansas could stay and be slaves)

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Ida Tarbell

Explanation:

The answer is Ida Tarbell

Answer: North African Muslims

Explanation:

The Moors were a Muslim people of mixed Berber and Arab descent who populated the Maghreb region of northwest Africa during the Middle Ages and the early modern period. Despite originating on the African continent, in the eighth century the Moors conquered the Iberian Peninsula—what we know today as Spain and Portugal.

Answer:

Answer:

Reading words and symbols on a painting can be challenging because we must first comprehend the meanings of the symbols before connecting these meanings to the words to build a tale.

A painting is a kind of visual communication. We are confronted with a written text in literature, which is usually written in familiar words since we speak the language that appears on the page. Even though we can't see them, the characters we encounter in literature are usually recognizable human beings, and we can comprehend their dialogue because we've heard speech similar to theirs before.

When you look at a picture, you have to have a distinct set of expectations. An author can describe a landscape or a scene's setting, but an artist attempts to recreate it so that we can see it for ourselves. This raises challenges unique to painting, such as color, shape, texture, size, and the relationship between one group of figures or objects and another, all of which eventually coalesce into the work's style.

It is easier to read text on a page since they are organized in a logical manner. When an author utilizes descriptive words to appeal to the reader's bodily sensations, this is known as imagery. This aids the reader in comprehending what the characters are seeing, touching, tasting, smelling, or hearing, which helps to bring the story to life. When writing a story, authors choose their words carefully and decide how to structure them so that they are understood the way they desire. They not only aim to conjure pictures in the minds of their readers, but they also use the words on the page to establish patterns that lead to a deeper understanding of the text. This is what is referred to as language patterns.

In my view, when words are interpreted on a picture, the meaning is much enhanced since the image has a visual aspect to support it.  To comprehend the message that the artist was trying to send, I analyzed the phrases painted on the artwork.

Explanation:

Answer:

Reading words and symbols on a painting can be difficult, because first we need to understand what the symbols mean and then connect these meanings with the words to form a story.

Reading words on a page is easier because they are arranged in an order that is easily understandable.

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States was motivated to build the Panama Canal to shorten ship routes. The only way to get from California to, let’s say, Brazil, was to go all around South America and waste so much time getting there. So as a result, The United States decided to build a canal for boats and ships to pass through in Central America to shorten the journey, and therefore getting goods faster and easier.

Hope this helps (:

Answer:

B. The speaker wants to win an election.

Explanation:

In the given passage from a speech, the speaker delves into the point of corruption which his opponent has accused him of. But the speaker counters the accusation by deflecting the same accusation at his opponent.

The speaker openly declares, imploring the audience "[to] remember on Election Day who the real honest politician is in this race. It's certainly not the man on the other side of the aisle trying to distract us from his own bad character." This deflection is done to point out the faults of the opponent and paint a good, much better picture/image of himself to garner support so that he can win the election.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

Answer:

C

Racism

Belief that there are distinct human races with inherent differences which determine their abilities, and generally that some are superior and others inferior.