Find the solution to the system of equations.

​

−2x+2y=−4
3x+3y=−18
​

Answer:

You don't need experiments to ask people questions

Answer:

  c.  y = 3.25^x

Step-by-step explanation:

At x=1, the value of y is slightly more than 3, so the base must be more than 3. The appropriate choice is ...

  y = 3.25^x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its m<2=degrees

Answer:

m∠1 = 131

m∠2 = 49

m∠2 = 112

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.09

because I multiplied...

Answer:

0.09

Step-by-step explanation:

36/ 10 x 25/ 1000 = 18/ 5 x 1/40 = 9/100 = 0.09

Answer:

Start with making them equal.

1/8 --> 3/24

1/8 --> 3/24

1/3 --> 8/24

Now order them.

1/8, 1/8, 1/3.

Hope this helps ;)

Answer:

[2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

[0,1), [0,1),[0,1),[0,1)

[1,2), [1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2)

[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3)

[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

C

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test and got it right :)

hopefully this helps you :)

pls mark brainlest ;)

[tex]\text{Solve for y:}\\\\2y+2=\frac{3y}{2}\\\\\text{Multiply both sides by 2 to cancel the denominator}\\\\4y+4=3y\\\\\text{Subtract 3y from both sides}\\\\y+4=0\\\\\text{Subtract 4 from both sides}\\\\\boxed{y=-4}[/tex]

Answer:-4

Step-by-step explanation:

2y+2=3y/2

Cross multiply

2(2y+2)=3y

Open bracket

4y+4=3y

Collect like terms

4y-3y=-4

y=-4

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. associative property of addition

Step-by-step explanation:

Associative because you can add or multiply those regardless of how the numbers are grouped.

I hope this helped and have a good rest of your day!

Answer:

Associative Property of Addition

Step-by-step explanation:

This property states that the sum of 3 or more numbers stays the same, no matter how they are grouped.

Hope this helped. Have an awesome day!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

350-75%=87.5\\so 350-87.5\\=262.5\\$262.5 dolla profit\\

Answer:

A. n = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

A. n = -2

4(-2) + 9 = 1

-8 + 9 = 1

1 = 1

The value of n for which the statement of equation 4n + 9 = 1 holds true is n = -2.

Given an equation:

4n + 9 = 1

There are some given options for the value of n.

It is required to find the value of n, where the statement is true.

A) When n = -2:

4n + 9 = 4(-2) + 9

          = 1

B) When n = 2:

4n + 9 = 4(2) + 9

          = 17

C) When n = 3:

4n + 9 = 4(3) + 9

          = 21

D) When n = 4:

4n + 9 = 4(4) + 9

          = 25

Hence the true statement is when n = -2.

Learn more about Equations here :

https://brainly.com/question/29657988

#SPJ2

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

22,950 units³

Step-by-step explanation:

All you have to do is:

[tex]\frac{3}{4} *60*15*34=\\45*15*34=\\675*34=\\\\22,950[/tex]

Answer: C electricity

Step-by-step explanation:

It is

Answer:

Which expression is equivalent to 3 over 175

I would say try - C or D

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer

the answer is -56

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

Jumbo burger with fried is 75%

chicken with salad is 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

you first split the burger and sides. You add up the sides to find the salad. Then add up the sides and burgers

Answer:

What is the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwich with a Salad? Make an area or tree diagram to help with the problem.

Answer to question: 20% for Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries and 10.5% for Chicken Sandwich with a Salad.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are going to find the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwhich with a Salad by using a area model or a tree diagram. Although you ddin't ask me to solve it, I'm gonna help you with it anyways.

Sandwhiches:

50% - Jumbo Burger (JB)

30% - Chicken Sandwich (CS)

20% - Regular Burger (RB)

Sides:

40% - Curly Fries (CF)

35% - Salad (S)

25% - Regular Fries (RF)

Acronyms

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Curly Fries (CF) = JBCF

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Salad (S) = JBS

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Regular Fries (RF) = JBRF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Curly Fries (CF) = CSCF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Salad (S) = CSS

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Regular Fries (RF) = CSRF

Regular Burger (RB) + Curly Fries (CF) = RBCF

Regular Burger (RB) + Salad (S) = RBS

Regular Burger (RB) + Regular Fries (RF) = RBRF

Probability of combinations:

JBCF = 0.5 x 0.4 = 0.20

JBS = 0.5 x 0.35 = 17.5

JBRF = 0.5 x 0.25 = 12.5

CSCF = 0.3 x 0.4 = 12

CSS = 0.3 x 0.35 = 10.5

CSRF = 0.3 x 0.25 = 7.5

RBCF = 0.2 x 0.4 = 8

RBS = 0.2 x 0.35 = 7

RBRF = 0.2 x 0.25 = 5

Your tree diagram should look something like this:

         CF(40%)- outcome - JBCF (20%)

          /  

(50%)JB ---  S(35%)-  outcome - JBS (17.5%)

           \            

           RF(25%)-  outcome - JBRF (12.5%)

         CF(40%)- outcome - CSCF (12%)

          /

(30%)CS ---  S(35%)- outcome - CSS (10.5%)

            \

            RF(25%)- outcome - CSRF (7.5%)

           CF(40%)- outcome - RBCF (8%)

           /

(20%)RB ---  S(35%)- outcome - RBS (7%)

          \

          RF(25%)- outcome - RBRF (5%)

Hope this helps because this took forever :D

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

7cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5+1+3=9

and there is 3 cheese pizza so its 3 over 8.

Answer:

3/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The attendance was 198 children, 90 students and 99 adults.

Step-by-step explanation:

We define:

c: children attendance

s: students attendance

a: adult attendance

The equation that describes the total ticket sales is:

[tex]5c+7s+12a=2808[/tex]

We also know that the children attendance doubles the adult attendance:

[tex]c=2a[/tex]

The third equation is the seating capacity, which we assume is full:

[tex]c+s+a=387[/tex]

We start by replacing variables in two of the equations:

[tex]c=2a\\\\s=387-c-a=387-2a-a=387-3a[/tex]

Then, we solve the remaining equation for a:

[tex]5c+7s+12a=2808\\\\5(2a)+7(387-3a)+12a=2808\\\\10a+(2709-21a)+12a=2808\\\\10a+12a-21a=2808-2709\\\\a=99[/tex]

Then, we solve for the other two equations:

[tex]c=2a=2*99=198\\\\s=387-3a=387-3*99=387-297=90[/tex]

The attendance was 198 children, 90 students and 99 adults.

Answer:

  $3840

Step-by-step explanation:

The total cost is ...

  (6 hr)(cost per hr) +(120 persons)(food cost per person)

  = 6($190) +120($15 +7.50)

  = $3840

The booking at Hotel 3 would cost $3840.