Answers
Answer:
BRO I NEVER READ THE BOOK HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW
Explanation:
Related Questions
Which is true of the 1912 presidential election
A. Although none of the candidates was progressive, the Progressives decided the election.
B. Because all three major candidates were progressive, progressive the socialist won.
C. Because all three major candidates were progressive, progressive votes were split.
D. Although none of the candidates was progressive, Progressive ideas were important
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
beacause may answer is d
The leader of the pilgrims from the
Mayflower was
A. Francisco Pizarro
B. Balboa Tuck
C. William Bradford
Answers
Answer: c) William Bradford
Explanation: The defiant strangers refused to recognize any rules since there was no official government over them. Pilgrim leader William Bradford later wrote, “several strangers made discontented and mutinous speeches.” The Pilgrims knew if something wasn't done quickly it could be every man, woman and family for themselves.
The Irish primarily settled in _____________ and ______________, and engaged in ____________________.
Fill in the blank
Answers
Answer:
Blank 1:
Shenandoah Valley
Blank 2:
Potatoe Farming
MORE INFO:
Almost one million Irish people died during the potato famine."
Also known as "Great Famine", it is a period between 1845 and 1849 in which the Irish population suffered mass starvation, which led to disease and subsequent migration due to the harsh living conditions in the country.
It is estimated that 1 million Irish died during this period and 1 million more emigrated from the country. This caused the total population of the country to fall from 20 to 25%.
Which statement BEST explains the similarities between the philosophies of John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau?
A.
Both philosophers believed in social contracts between freely formed governments and their citizens.
B.
Locke and Rousseau believed that monarchies were the only stable forms of government.
C.
Locke and Rousseau shared the opinion that the separation of powers in government would take away the liberty of citizens.
D.
Both philosophers, unlike Sir Robert Filmer, believed that only governments formed with the consent of the people should enjoy “divine rights.”
QUICK PLEASE
Answers
Answer:
A. Both philosophers believed in social contracts between freely formed governments and their citizens.
Rank these three American strengths at the start of the Revolutionary War, from most important to least important. Discuss why you ranked them in the order you did.
Patriotism
George Washington
Aid from France
Answers
George Washington
Aid from France
Which characteristic is related to the Populist Party? A. greater regulation of business B. emphasis on the gold standard C. political power for the wealthy D. tax reduction
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
A greater regulation of business is defined as the characteristic is related to the Populist Party. Thus, option A is correct.
What is the Populist Party?A variety of political ideologies that place a strong emphasis on “the people” and frequently pit this group against “the elite” are referred to as populist or the Populist Party.
It is typically linked to political and establishment opposition. The formation of a coalition between rural farmers in the South and West and urban labourers in the Midwest and Northeast was one of the main objectives of the Populist Party.
In the later areas, union leaders like Terrence Powderly, the leader of the Knights of Labour, and Eugene V, the railroad organizer, supported the populists.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about the Populist Party, refer to:
brainly.com/question/26432700
#SPJ2
8. Which scenario best illustrates how the power to make treaties in the United States Constitution provides (1 point) for checks and balances among the three branches of government? The president must sign an executive agreement without the Senate, but must have approval of the House O The Senate must approve a treaty by a two-thirds vote, and its terms must be found to be constitutional by The House of Representatives must approve the treaty by a two-thirds vote, but it can be vetoed by the pre The Supreme Court must decide whether the treaty is constitutional, but Congress tan override the Court
Answers
The Senate must approve a treaty by a two-thirds vote, and its terms must be found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court.
Answer:
The correct answer is that The Senate must approve a treaty by a two-thirds vote, and its terms must be found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
The author of Document A structures the text in a way that emphasizes positive
aspects of the battle in order to create a sense of...
A:triumph
B:failure
C:indifference
D:fear
Answers
The author of the document emphasizes the strengths of the battle to create a sense of triumph.
We can arrive at this answer because:
By showing the positive points of the battle, the author wishes to highlight the victories that were conquered and the successes achieved.This is done to show that the battle was efficient and managed to achieve the proposed objectives.With this, the author transmits a successful tone, which makes the reader understand that the text wants to present the triumphs achieved in the battle, to show that it was a successful activity and that it promoted improvements, despite the problems.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/9893714?referrer=searchResults
Write a paragraph explaining why someone is helpful if they serve on a jury
(i dont care if you dont do it i just need to get rid of some points)
Answers
Answer:
The jury fulfils a very important function in the legal system. You are entitled to be tried by jury unless the alleged offence is a minor one or one that is being tried in the Special Criminal Court. However, a jury is not required in every legal case. There will be a jury in some civil cases such as defamation and assault cases. However, for the majority of civil cases such as personal injuries actions and family law cases, there is no jury - it is the judge who decides the outcome.
Explanation:
hope it helps :)
СС
P
b
Peter the Great sought to build a
great, powerful state by using
customs, manners, and
technology from somewhere else.
How did this approach differ from
that used by Louis XIV in France?
d
F
Answers
The difference between Louis XVI and Peter I is that Peter introduced Westernization to Russia, while Louis failed in his attempt to evolve the monarchy of France.
Peter I (1672-1725) was a Russian ruler who ruled between 1682 - 1696. During this period he stood out for belonging to the Romanov Dynasty and implementing a process of modernization through Westernization and expansion that transformed Russia into an of the main European powers.
On the other hand, Louis XVI of France (1754 - 1793) was the last king of monarchical France. He stood out because he wanted to implement government reforms in France such as:
Abolish servitudeElimination of property taxObligation to work without pay for the feudal lordIncreased tolerance towards non-Catholics andAbolition of the death penalty for deserters.However, these measures caused rejection in the middle and upper class. Later on, his support for the Americans in the war of independence against the United Kingdom caused a waste of money that was evidenced in a wide famine and social discontent that led to the abolition of the monarchy and to be sentenced to death in the guillotine
According to the above, it can be inferred that both rulers had different governments because PeTER was one of the most prominent rulers of Russia, while Louis unleashed an economic crisis that affected his government and led to the abolition of the monarchy.
Learn more about Louis XVI in: https://brainly.com/question/1719168
"The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign Nations is in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled, with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."
Which of the following is the source of this statement on foreign policy?
A) George Washington's Farewell Address
B) The Monroe Doctrine
C) Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address
D) The Federalist Papers
Answers
Answer: George Washington Farewell address (A)
Explanation:
Nicetas writes of the Crusaders, “In truth, they were exposed as frauds."
What does he mean by this statement? How were the Crusader's frauds?
Answers
Answer:
will what he is saying is he described how they are fraud so list what you think they did for him to call them fraud
Explanation:
Nicetas Choniates viewed the crusaders as the harmful ones who have destroyed the whole of the Byzantine Empire along with the city of Constantinople. The Crusaders who had once set foot in the territories had destroyed the places and also had done major loot and plunders. The Crusaders were frauds because they came in the hope of spreading god's words and taking over the holy lands.
Who are the Crusaders?Crusaders are those people who fought the war, especially along the line of the so-called people of the time. The most important thing of that time is that the people have been on the lost land for a way more time and also for a very long period. The Crusaders were the fighters of the Holy War.
The Crusaders used to fight the war for the capture of the Holy lands from the control of the Muslims. The most important thing regarding this was the time frame and also the understanding by which the Latin American Catholic Church made the crusaders believe about the claiming of the land.
The Crusaders went on their work of crusading from the 11th, 12th, and 13th Century period. The first spike for the Crusaders was given by Pope Urban II of the Clermont-Ferrand.
Learn more about the Crusaders here:
https://brainly.com/question/8191125
#SPJ2
Please help asap.......................
Answers
Answer:
Try looking it up. Here is an example for brave but I can't find anything else: They fought long and hard although there were 10 times the amount of attackers as there were defenders. They all stayed to defend it because they were brave.
Explanation:
What did delegates for a strong national government believe?
Answers
Answer:
The delegates for a strong national government believed that a strong national government would endanger the rights of states. The delegates for stronger state governments believed that a strong national government would threaten individual liberty.
Explanation:
