I need help rn please

Answer:

Paul Jobs was raised in Germantown, Wisconsin and became a Coast Guard in World War II. He made a bet with his friends that he would be able to find a wife within two weeks. He met Clara Hagopian, who was born in New Jersey after her parents fled the Turks in Armenia, and the couple was engaged within ten days. Clara realized that she could not have children, so the married couple looked at adoption (Issacson 28-29). Joanna Schieble was a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin. She lived within a strict household where her father was extremely strict about dating. When Joanna met Abdulfattah Jandali, a Muslim teaching assistant from Syria, her father threatened to disown her. She went with Abdulfattah to Syria and two months later when they returned, found out she was pregnant. Keeping the baby and abortion were not options the couple considered. When Joanna found out the adoptive couple were Paul and Clara Jobs, she made them promise that they would keep a college fund for the baby. Steve Jobs was born on February 24th, 1955. After some reluctance, Joanna signed the adoption papers and gave Steve Jobs to his new parents (Issacson 30-31).Steve Jobs knew from a young age that he was adopted. Many of his close friends believe that the awareness that he was given up as a baby made him into the independent person he grew up to be (Issacson 32). Jobs has said that he knows people say that the reason why he has worked so hard was because he wanted his biological parents to want him back, but Steve said that is not true. (Issacson 33). Steve’s father is the person that introduced Steve to technology. Paul worked on cars often, and although Steve did not like to get his hands dirty, he loved doing whatever he could to help. Getting, Sara, and Karin Swainey. "First Graders with iPads? Find out how two teachers took on the challenge of improving elementary reading, achieved surprising success with their youngest at-risk readers, and learned some interesting things along the way." Learning & Leading with Technology August 2012: 24+. General Reference Center GOLD. Web. 11 December 2013. Isaacson, Walter. Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011. Print. Mills, Elinor, and Bob Wallace. “Jobs is back: Apple buys NeXT for $400M.” Computerworld. 23 December 1996: 8. General Reference Center GOLD.

Explanation:

here is a whole essay

Answer:

It takes a lot of courage to be a follower of Jesus in modern society for a multitude of reasons...

Explanation:

In today's society, given the times and their trivial nature recently, many people find it hard to believe there is a god at all. For these people, the concept of keeping their opinion to themselves is foreign, which affects those around them who do believe. In schools, workplaces, and even just in a person's neighborhood, a believer in Jesus gets ridiculed, harassed and even threatened for having faith. Because of the controversy on the topic of God, it is also not allowed to be talked about in school or some workplaces. To be a believer in Christ in a day and age where you are literally in danger from some people because of believing takes bravery and true loyalty to your faith. That is why being a follower of Jesus takes courage. And as sad as it is to say it, many people aren't courageous enough to take that stand.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

there is no thesis statement

Explanation:

Hello. This question is incomplete. The complete question is:

Read the poem "If We Must Die" by Claude McKay

If we must die-let it not be like hogs

Hunted and penned in an inglorious spot,

While round us bark the mad and hungry dogs,

Making their mock at our accursed lot.

If we must die oh, let us nobly die,

So that our precious blood may not be shed

In vain; then even the monsters we defy

Shall be constrained to honor us though dead!

Oh, Kinsmen! We must meet the common foe;

Though far outnumbered, let us still be brave,

And for their thousand blows deal one death-blow!

Which best describes the speaker in this poem?

Answer:

The speaker is a stimulator who seeks to encourage readers not to accept oppression, but to stand up as a resilient force.

Explanation:

The speaker of the poem is very persuasive and incisive in his ideas about the fight against oppression. For the speaker, oppression must be accepted, but it must be combated at all costs. it persuades and encourages readers to fight against oppression, even if it is difficult and even if it causes their death, because for the speaker, this is an honorable fight and those who lose their lives in it, will lose it in a noble way, in name of freedom and justice.

The statement that describes the speaker in this poem is that the speaker is giving advice about how to be resilience and stand against oppression at all cost.

A narrator is the one that is narrating the incident that occurs in the poem.

Therefore, he stated that nothing can be compared with freedom and it always worth to fight for.

Read more on poem at:

https://brainly.com/question/13942462

Answer:

If 2 words is okay then a lot but if you just need one word then super (Like thats super cool instead of thats very cool)

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The answer is number 4.

Explanation:

Answer:

To let us know about those before us like history.

Explanation:

Answer:

The main character doesn't understand that the cold will be more than he can bear. He also doesn't seem to be very good at thinking ahead and planning for problems. These two weaknesses are what lead to the man's death. This part of the excerpt shows that the main character does not have the ability to plan for the worst:

The trouble with him was that he was without imagination. He was quick and alert in the things of life, but only in the things, and not in the significances. Fifty degrees below zero meant eighty-odd degrees of frost. Such fact impressed him as being cold and uncomfortable, and that was all. It did not lead him to meditate upon his frailty as a creature of temperature, and upon man's frailty in general, able only to live within certain narrow limits of heat and cold; and from there on it did not lead him to the conjectural field of immortality and man's place in the universe.

In this part of the excerpt, London states that his character "is without imagination." London also writes that the man is only "quick and alert in the things of life," but doesn’t understand the meaning of those things. This quotation suggests that the man was unable to imagine what he had never experienced. Since he had never experienced the harsh cold, he didn’t understand that his body wouldn’t be able to handle the harsh weather of the Yukon. That’s why he wasn’t prepared. He assumed that his trek would only be "cold and uncomfortable" rather than deadly. In the end, he must face his own foolishness.

Explanation:

This is the sample answer on edmentum/plato. Change it up a bit :)

Answer:

The Dharahara or Bhimsen Tower was located in Sundhara, and was a historical and tourist attraction of the city.

Explanation:

     The nine-story Dharahara Tower, one of the city's top tourist attractions with its 200 spiral staircase steps, was reduced to rubble due to the 7.8-degree earthquake on the Richter scale at noon on Saturday.

In a few minutes, the tower fell to the ground with about 100 people inside.

Apart from the priceless human losses, one of the most regrettable tragedies left by the earthquake in Nepal is its effect on the historic architecture of the region. Home to seven areas designated as World Heritage by UNESCO, the affected regions of Kathmandu, Patan and Bhaktapur are making headlines for the extensive damage that has been uncovered to their most important monuments.

Despite not being a "UNESCO Site", one of the most dramatic losses is the collapse of the Dharahara tower in Kathmandu, a distinctive feature of its skyline even before the earthquake.

Answer:

Colorful,creepy a little, shapes

Explanation:

Answer:D

Explanation:

Did the quiz

Answer: D is correct

Explanation:

Answer:

6. a. first person point of view

Explanation:

because in telling a story ..it is the first person or the person that is reading the story because who would read it?.....the story cannot tell its own story...it must be telled by the one who is reading it...welcome

Answer and Explanation:

"An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" is a short story by American author Ambrose Bierce set during the Civil War. The main character, Peyton Farquhar, is tricked into trying to burn a bridge that would allow Union soldiers to cross into Confederate territory.

Bierce does not narrate this story in chronological order. By doing that, he gets to trick readers, especially towards the end. In the first part of the story, Farquhar is already about to be hanged, having been accused of treason. However, the second part is a flashback. We get to know who Farquhar is and how he got tricked into trying to burn the bridge. In part three, the narrator deceives readers. It is time to actually hang Farquhar. But, while Bierce separated reality and flashback into two different parts before, he does not do that now. Reality and hallucinations are mixed. We are led to believe that the noose broke and that Farquhar was able to escape and return home. We are brought back to reality in a sudden, almost cruel way:

Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body, with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge.

Farquhar never escaped. He hallucinated in the brief moments it took him to die from hanging.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

A is the only concise answer, and the only one that makes grammatical sense. I hope this helps

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

hook it up w a brainliest

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

A, B and C contain words and expressions that may be deemed "Informal" such as "coolest" or "totally" and are thus inappropriate for a formal essay.

Answer:

B. That you had

Explanation:

This is dependent on more, it makes no sense by itself so you need more information for it to make sense.

Answer:

context?

Explanation:

Answer:

do you have the poem in question? could you post a picture of it please?

Answer:

It is wide, deep, and weighty.

Explanation:

Answer: Brainliest?

Advantages of a constitutional monarchy:

Stability. The head of state is appointed for a very long perdiod of time, usually until she/he abdicates or die. This gives the country more stability in comparison with republics where the head of state changes every few years.

Education. In a monarchy, the future head of state is known from birth, therefore she/he is raised and educated accordingly. Monarchs are usually well prepared for their role and enjoy a priviledged multidisciplinary education.

Neutrality. The head of state is not a politician, therefore is not tied to any particular party. She/he can ensure neutrality and balance while in power.

No election cost. In many countries, the campaign to elect the head of state can be very expensive. In monarchy, succession has little costs.

Less corruption? Advocates of constitutional monarchy claim that knowing you will serve for a life term reduces the risk of corruption, while an elected politician may feel the urge to take advantage of his position knowing it will not last. Presidents may have shorter term goals and incentives, while the monarch may care more about the long term. After all they want their children to inherit the throne and don't want them to have to face a complicated future.

Disadvantages of a constitutional monarchy:

Lack of democracy. The head of state is not elected and inherits the position. The citizen have little to say about who will reign, although in most constitutional monarchies the monarchs needs the approval of the Parliament, and therefore, indirectly of the people this institution represents.

Not every monarch is competent. The head of state may have been prepared to reign, but this does not guarantee that this particular person is suitable and competent for the position. HIstory is full of incompetent, arrongant, tyrannic or careless monarchs.

Monarchs are people; therefore have personal beliefs and political preferences, often they are quite conservative. Their views and beliefs may be at odds with those of the majority in their country.

Royal families often have a very expensive lifestyle. In addition to the king or queen, other members of the royalty also receive public salaries and perks. Moreover simply organizing their trips and security is very costly. Although we should keep in mind that presidents and prime ministers in republics are also costly, sometimes more than monarchs.

More corruption? Sometimes justice is permissive with the abuses of royal families. They are somehow protected because it is not in the interest of the country to see their figures delegitimized. However, this also creates an incentive for members of the royal families to abuse sometimes their status.

Explanation:

Answer:

(suffix) -itis (meaning) inflammation of the bronchus The term bronchitis has a root bronch- (bronchus) and a suffix -itis (inflammation); and means inflammation of the bronchus.

I hope this helped, have an awesome day!

I think it would be A

Answer:

The answer would be B.

Explanation:

I just took the test and put A but it was B.

We have simply watched a video; it's a scene from the pic “Falling down”. a person enters a fast-food eating house to order breakfast. The waiter refuses him as a result of the breakfasts are not any longer served. She offers him lunch. the person gets angry and asks what she calls the manager. He comes in and tells him an equivalent issue, that they stop serving breakfast at 11:30. It’s 11:31.

They force him to possess lunch, they do not take him into consideration. This lack of respect, even supposing he's a client, that he pays, drives him crazy. He pulls out a weapon. most are scared! And he asks for breakfast once more, the solution is "yes, sire." thus he modifies his mind, and decides to decide on lunch. He teases folks as a result of he created an associate attack within the nutriment for his breakfast and currently he doesn’t need it.

Explanation:

Answer:

Which character are you talking about? You gotta be specific if you want 200  words on it lol

Explanation:

Answer:

The term flamboyant means: (of a person or their behavior) tending to attract attention because of their exuberance, confidence, and stylishness.

Explanation:

This is the definition I pulled from an online dictionary.

Hope it helps!