Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Since 2018, alcohol has been removed from the list of prohibited substances and is therefore not analyzed in state prisons in most states. However, in cases of driving vehicles in which the driver is under the effect of alcohol, this substance is considered if a prohibited substance test is carried out, as driving under the influence of alcohol is prohibited throughout the country.
Discuss what traits successful law enforcement leaders have. If you had to select one most important characteristic of a law enforcement leader, explain which characteristic you would select. Defend and be specific. Of the common errors made by those who manage, supervise and lead, explain which has the most potential for the most ill effects on a department. Give examples and support your decision.
Answer and Explanation:
A successful leader must be someone who is incorruptible, fair, tolerant and egalitarian, who does his job in a peaceful, correct and progress-promoting way, free from prejudice. The absence of prejudice and the ability to act in a peaceful manner are the main characteristics that a police leader must present. This is because a police leader who has these characteristics serves as an example to other police officers, who can shape their work and behavior to be less violent professionals and who judge people correctly, without considering racism and prejudice.
Within a department, corruption is the most harmful characteristic among legal professionals. This corruption takes away from the sense of fairness that is so essential within a police department. An example of this can be seen in corrupt police officers who facilitate illegal activities of powerful people, but fight and destroy black families and other social minorities based only on prejudice.
Explain, In your own words, why the therapeutic alliance is so important in confronting offenders.
Answer:
A positive therapeutic alliance has many benefits one is it can reduce su-icide attempts among people with Borderline Personality Disorder in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. A confident “early working alliance” can also lead to a reduction in symptoms in chronically depressed patients. Overall this alliance can have a major affect on people.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking for but I hope this helps a bit
(I put a dash because I couldn't post with that word)
hội nghị trao đổi thông tin là gì ?
Answer: Trao đổi thông tin hoặc chia sẻ thông tin có nghĩa là mọi người hoặc các thực thể khác truyền thông tin từ người này sang người khác. Điều này có thể được thực hiện bằng điện tử hoặc thông qua các hệ thống nhất định. Đây là những thuật ngữ có thể đề cập đến việc truyền thông tin hai chiều trong viễn thông và khoa học máy tính hoặc truyền thông được nhìn từ quan điểm lý thuyết hệ thống hoặc lý thuyết thông tin. Như, "thông tin", trong ngữ cảnh này luôn đề cập đến dữ liệu (điện tử) mã hóa và đại diện cho thông tin có sẵn, một phương pháp xử lý rộng hơn có thể được tìm thấy trong quá trình trao đổi dữ liệu.
Explanation:
what is rule of law
Answer:
Restrictions that would enforce pepopel from wrong doings with the consequences listed.
Explanation:
Do you believe children that who have been adopted into a different culture should be exposed to and learn the culture and languages of their birth parents?
what is name one of your teacher
Answer:
pinky roy ma'am
Explanation:
she teaches me sst
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
how does the criminal justice system deals with vulnerable groups such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex ( LGBTQI) community amongst others when they are victims of hate crimes
Answer:
depending on the country of justice system implementation we are talking about, some countries protect their rights as minorities while others prohibited the prevalence of such groups
Answer:by using the law
Explanation:
Leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but only if there are major injuries to others or private property.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the legal system which governs all the members of the military of the United States of America. It covers a number of legal issues from the apprehension and the confinement of military personnel to the regulations covering courts of the military appeals.
It defines criminal offenses under military system.
The German Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice has strict laws against road accidents.
Incase of a accident, the drive must stay at the scene. If the driver leaves the scene, a serious criminal offense will be register against him of hit and run. The driver must stay and turn on the emergency flashers and also put up the warning triangle.
Thus the answer is TRUE.
It is A. TRUE that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
What is UCMJ?The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to soldiers and other members of the armed forces when they are on active duty or on recall to active duty. It requires that these military personnel do not abandon victims of accidents at the scene.
Even the German law forbids persons from abandoning victims of accidents.
Thus, it is true that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense both under the German law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Learn more about the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at https://brainly.com/question/6545593
why is the term judicial administration multifaceted
Answer:
Judicial administration
Explanation:
Judicial administration consists of the practices, procedures and offices that deal with the management of the system of the courts. Judicial administration, or administration of the courts, has traditionally been concerned with overseeing budgets, selecting juror pools, assigning judges to cases, creating court calendars of activities, and supervising non-judicial personnel. Court administrators, or clerks of the court, accept the filing of court documents, maintain a file system of cases and a record of all final judgments, and process paperwork generated by judges. Court administrators are also responsible for eliminating racial and gender bias in the courts, ensuring diversity in the court system, and providing easier access to the courts for persons representing themselves without an attorney (pro se or pro per litigants).
Can I helpfull of you
do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.
Answer:
Do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.
Explanation:
Phân tích cấu trúc pháp lý của quy phạm pháp luật sau:
“ người nào sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh, thì bị phạt tù từ 02 năm đến 07 năm”’
Trích khoản 1, điều 194 bộ luật hình sự Việt Nam. Tội sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh.
Answer:
Analyze the legal structure of the following legal norm:
Any person who manufactures or trades in counterfeit goods being curative or preventive drugs shall be sentenced to between 2 and 7 years of imprisonment.
Excerpt from Clause 1, Article 194 of Vietnam's penal code. Crime of producing and trading in counterfeit goods being curative and preventive drugs.
Explanation:
I don't know the answer but I am helping those people who doesn't understand vetnamese...they could understand this
Answer:
Người nào sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh, thì bị phạt tù từ 02 năm đến 07 năm.
2. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 05 năm đến 12 năm:
a) Có tổ chức;
b) Có tính chất chuyên nghiệp;
c) Tái phạm nguy hiểm;
d) Lợi dụng chức vụ, quyền hạn;
đ) Lợi dụng danh nghĩa cơ quan, tổ chức;
e) Buôn bán qua biên giới;
g) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá từ 150.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;
h) Thu lợi bất chính từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;
i) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể từ 31% đến 60%;
k) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng.
3. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 12 năm đến 20 năm:
a) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá 500.000.000 đồng trở lên;
b) Thu lợi bất chính từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 2.000.000.000 đồng;
c) Làm chết người;
d) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể 61% trở lên;
đ) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này từ 61% đến 121%;
e) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 1.500.000.000 đồng.
4. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù 20 năm, tù chung thân hoặc tử hình:
a) Thu lợi bất chính 2.000.000.000 đồng trở lên;
b) Làm chết 02 người trở lên;
c) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này 122% trở lên;
d) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản 1.500.000.000 đồng trở lên.
5. Người phạm tội còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 20.000.000 đồng đến 100.000.000 đồng, cấm đảm nhiệm chức vụ, cấm hành nghề hoặc làm công việc nhất định từ 01 năm đến 05 năm hoặc tịch thu một phần hoặc toàn bộ tài sản.
6. Pháp nhân thương mại phạm tội quy định tại Điều này, thì bị phạt như sau:
a) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 1 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 1.000.000.000 đồng đến 4.000.000.000 đồng;
b) Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp quy định tại các điểm a, b, c, e, g, h, i và k khoản 2 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 4.000.000.000 đồng đến 9.000.000.000 đồng;
c) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 3 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 9.000.000.000 đồng đến 15.000.000.000 đồng;
d) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 4 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 15.000.000.000 đồng đến 20.000.000.000 đồng hoặc đình chỉ hoạt động có thời hạn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm;
đ) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại Điều 79 của Bộ luật này, thì bị đình chỉ hoạt động vĩnh viễn;
e) Pháp nhân thương mại còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 100.000.000 đồng đến 300.000.000 đồng, cấm kinh doanh, cấm hoạt động trong một số lĩnh vực nhất định hoặc cấm huy động vốn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm.
'न्यायपालिकाको महत्व,कानुन सुसासनको निम्ति' यो शिर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख।
Answer:
Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.
What
are
the objectives of the
Industrial
pollution.
study
Answer:
High spatial resolution emissions
Integrated modelling
Health effects of air pollution
Assessment and quantification of health impacts
Distribution of welfare and challenges for the Nordic welfare systems
Does the Bible say anything about standing up for yourself if you believe that the judicial system is not being fair or right
Answer:
no its says to stand up for those who cant stand up but ethier way if u wanna stand up for that then do it you dont have to follow it we sin but be you
Explanation: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
roles of ethics on the national development show citation per page three page
Công ty TNHH Hết hạn có 03 thành viên. Công ty muốn phát hành cổ phần vào tháng 12/2021 để chuyển đổi thành công ty cổ phần. Nhận định nào sau đây đúng? Tất cả đều đúng. "Được vì đây là trường hợp để chuyển thành công ty cổ phần", Bạn học giỏi nhất lớp nói. "Không được vì Công ty TNHH không được phát hành cổ phần trong mọi trường hợp", Chiên gia nói.
Answer:
Tôi khá chắc chắn là "Được rồi.".
Explanation:
what’s the difference between TYPES and FORMS of government. Or is there no difference at all??
Answer:
Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.
3. How can it be said that courts adjudicate the allocation of the costs of a consumer-oriented economy?
Answer:
It can be said that the courts assess the consumer profile and consumption pattern in a region, determining which sectors will receive more subsidies to reduce expenses, but increase the production of goods and services, optimizing the regional economy.
Explanation:
A consumer-oriented economy is one that is oriented and driven by consumer spending. Therefore, regions that have this type of economy should study and analyze the consumer profile that citizens have, evaluating the goods and services that are most consumed and that are sustaining this economy more efficiently. Thus, the allocation of expenditures should be determined by the courts in that region, based on the sectors that are most in line with the consumer's profile, being the most profitable sectors and the ones that should be more stimulated.
Roles of the traditional rulurs chief in Ghana during the colonial period ?
Answer:
I like the sky bc it can't see me and I can see it but I see red in my eyes and I smoke a lil to much weed
Which statement best summarizes the relationship between investments and
productivity?
A. Companies use investments to avoid having to improve
productivity.
B. Companies improve their productivity using money from
investments.
C. Companies with low levels of productivity have no need for
investment.
D. Companies decide on their level of productivity based on their
investments.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Companies improve their productivity using money from investments.
Explanation:
In the capitalist production system, companies require an initial investment of money to be able to produce the goods or services they offer to the market. Thus, this money is used, among other things, for the purchase of inputs, machinery, advertising expenses, etc., aimed at maximizing its returns. Therefore, the more money the company has, the higher its productivity.
Answer:
Companies with poor productivity use investments to become more efficient.
Explanation:
hich often means a more thoughtful presentation of ideas?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Based on the three elements of the contract intended to create a legal relationship, capacity and judgment, advise Sandhu if there is a prospect for him to recover the additional commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.
1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.
3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? Certainly not.
What results from the federal system of government in the United States?
A Only powers specifically given to the government are legal.
B. Citizens vote on some issues directly rather than through
representatives.
C. State governments have some powers that the federal
govemment does not have
D. The powers of the national government are limited by law.
Answer:
Only powers specifically given to the government are legal
Explanation:
What results from the federal system of government in the United States is that only powers specifically given to the government are legal
This is because the government of the United States of America is governed by the Constitution which is considered supreme and any power that is not specifically given by the constitution to the government is considered illegal.
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value has two elements, they are
Select one:
a. the land value plus the value of the improvements on the land
b. the land value and area improvements
c. comparable improvements plus land value
d. none of the above
Answer:
d. none of the above
Explanation:
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value is a method of getting the value of real estate by estimating the price a buyer should pay for the property, based on the depreciation factors involved.
Using this approach, the value of the property is equals to the land cost, plus the total costs of construction, minus depreciation.
Therefore, the correct answer is none of the above as the answer is not in the given answer choices.
The penalties for a first-time DUI charge include imprisonment for __________.
A. 180 days
B. up to six months for a BAL of .08 to .15
C. up to one year if there is a minor in the vehicle
D. B and C
Answer:
i think its d which is b and c
Find and summarise the case of National Director of Public Prosecutions v Botha (CCT 280/18) [2020] ZACC 06. Your summary must highlight the facts, legal question, the findings and decision of the court
Personal property generally does not convey in the sale of real property; however, sometimes the parties to the transaction agree to include some items of personal property in the sale. In an instance like this, the agent?
Answer: should identify in the contract which personal property items are to be included in the sale
Explanation:
Personal property refers to the class of property which has to do with an asset that's not a real estate.
Based on the situation given, in an instance like this, the agent should identify in the contract which personal property items are to be included in the sale.
Ram has just sold his share in a company and decided to buy a new car for his wife. On 15 April 2019, Ram appointed Gan as his agent to buy a car at the price not exceeding RM 75,000. The next day, Gan went to see Song, a car dealer and booked a car at the price of RM 85,000 and paid the deposit of RM 8,500. Gan told Song that the car was meant for Ram’s personal use. Song gave Gan RM 500 as a commission for booking the car with him. One month after the booking date, Song sent the car to Ram and claimed for the balance purchase price of the car. Ram told Song that he has never authorized Gan to purchase the car at that price and refused to accept the car. Advise Ram with regards to his rights as a principal. 2. Describe the circumstances under which a principal cannot revoke/ terminate the authority of his agent.
Answer:
Principal and Agent
1. Rights of the Principal:
a. The principal can enforce the various duties of an agent.
b. The principal can recover compensation for any breach of duty by the agent.
c. The principal can forfeit agent’s remuneration where the agent is guilty of misconduct in the agency business.
d. The principal is entitled to any extra profit that the agent has made out of his agency. This includes the illegal gratification of RM500 that Song paid to Gan.
2. Circumstances under which the principal cannot revoke/terminate the authority of his agent are:
a. The agent has performed his authority partially.
b. When the agency is coupled with a legal interest in the agency and the interest has not been realized by the agent or the interest has not expired.
Explanation:
a) Some facts of the case:
Principal = Ram
Agen = Gan
Car dealer = Song
Authority limit for the purchase of the car = RM 75,000
Actual amounted booked for the car by the agent = RM 85,000
Deposit for the car = RM 8,500
Commission received from Song by Gan = RM 500
b) Gan did not actually act in the best interest of his principal, Ram, who gave him limited authority to buy a car at a price not exceeding RM 75,000. It looks like Gan was more interested in the commission (bribe) that he received from Song instead of performing his duties as an agent to Ram. If the agency authority is written down, Ram can use it as evidence that Gan's authority was limited.
