Please help me to solve it

Answer:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.95}{2} = 0.025[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.025 = 0.975[/tex], so Z = 1.96.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

Standard deviation of 3 hours.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 3[/tex]

The 95% level of confidence is to be used. How many executives should be surveyed?

n executives should be surveyed, and n is found with [tex]M = 0.25[/tex]. So

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25 = 1.96\frac{3}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25\sqrt{n} = 1.96*3[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{1.96*3}{0.25}[/tex]

[tex](\sqrt{n})^2 = (\frac{1.96*3}{0.25})^2[/tex]

[tex]n = 553.2[/tex]

Rounding up:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Answer:

You would expect 807 babies  to weigh between 3 and 6 pounds.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

Mean,[tex]\mu=5.4[/tex]pounds

Standard deviation,[tex]\sigma=1.8[/tex]pounds

n=1500

We have to find how  many would you expect to weigh between 3 and 6 pounds.

The weights for newborn babies is approximately normally distributed.

Now,

[tex]P(3<x<6)=P(\frac{3-5.4}{1.8}<\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{6-5.4}{1.8})[/tex]

[tex]=P(-1.33<Z<0.33)[/tex]

[tex]P(3<x<6)=P(Z<0.33)-P(Z<-1.33)[/tex]

[tex]P(3<x<6)=0.62930-0.09176[/tex]

[tex]P(3<x<6)=0.538[/tex]

Number of newborn  babies expect to weigh between 3 and 6 pounds

=[tex]1500\times 0.538=807[/tex]

Answer:

The degree is the highest number exponent....

that is hard to see in your question...

it does appear to be a 2?

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  f(x) = 5x

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical stretch is accomplished by multiplying the function value by the stretch factor. f(x) = x is stretched by a factor of 5 by multiplying it by 5:

  f(x) = 5x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps much

Answer:

y = 0.9143x - 0.8

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

Region Temperature Yield (in bushes per acre)

4 ______ 3

8 ______ 7

10 _____ 8

12 _____ 10

9 ______ 8

6 ______ 4

Using technology, the least square regression equation obtained by fitting the data is :

y = 0.9143x - 0.8

Where ;

y = predicted Bush yield, predicted variable

x = Average temperature, dependent variable

The slope Coefficient = 0.9143

The intercept = - 0.8

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Each f(x) increases by 8 therefore this equation is a linear function. If you where to graph it would be a straight line

Hope this helped :)

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is the same between all pounts which means the function is linear.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

r = 4.1231055

Step-by-step explanation:

So to do this, you need to find the distance between the two points:

(-7,1) and (1,3).

To do this, the distance or diameter (d) is equal to:

d = sqrt ((x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2)

In this case:

d = sqrt( (1 - (-7))^2 + (3 - 1)^2 )

d = sqrt( 8^2 + 2^2)

d = sqrt( 64 + 4)

d = sqrt( 68 )

The radius is half of the diameter, so:

r = 1/2 * d

r = 1/2 * sqrt( 68 )

r~ 4.1231055

Answer:

56.5 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Because complementary angles are when their sum is 90, you get the equation:

P + Q = 90

Since Q is 33.5,

P + 33.5 = 90

Subtracting 33.5 from both sides,

P = 56.5

Answer:

v=-6 or 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer would be 5

Step-by-step explanation:

have to do the question multiply add and divide to find your answer

Answer:  [tex]_{13} P _{13}[/tex]

Another acceptable answer is 13! where the exclamation mark is needed.

The numeric form is 6,227,020,800 which is a little over 6 billion.

==============================================================

Explanation:

Let's lump those four songs together to form a so called "mega song". So we treat those four items as one single item. This is ensure that those songs are played in the order we want. The other songs aren't treated this way.

We start with 16 songs and drop to 16-4 = 12 songs when taking out those four named songs. Then we add 1 to get 12+1 = 13 since we're adding in that "mega song" block.

---------------------------

So to recap so far, we've gone from 16 songs to 13 songs. The goal is to find out how many arrangements of 13 songs are possible. Order matters.

We'll use the nPr permutation function

[tex]_{n} P _{r} = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}\\\\[/tex]

where in this case n = 13 and r = 13. Your teacher doesn't want you to evaluate this function. You simply need to state the symbolic form. So that's why we go from [tex]_{n} P _{r}[/tex] to [tex]_{13} P _{13}[/tex]

If you wanted to answer this in terms of factorial notation, then you could say this

[tex]_{n} P _{r} = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}\\\\_{13} P _{13} = \frac{13!}{(13-13)!}\\\\_{13} P _{13} = \frac{13!}{(0)!}\\\\_{13} P _{13} = \frac{13!}{1}\\\\_{13} P _{13} = 13!\\\\[/tex]

So we can see that the notations [tex]_{13} P _{13}[/tex] and [tex]13![/tex] mean the exact same thing.

If you wanted to know the actual number of permutations, then,

13! = 13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 6,227,020,800

which is a little over 6 billion permutations.

Answer:

350

Step-by-step explanation:

400- 80 ( 20% discount)

=320+30(loss)

=350

Answer:

The difference is that Marla's exam in her statistics class was graded by percent of correct answers, in her case 70%, while the SAT is graded into a curve, taking other students' grades also into account, and since she scored in the 70th percentile, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Step-by-step explanation:

Marla scored 70% on her last unit exam in her statistics class.

This means that in her statistics class, Marla got 70% of her test correct.

When Marla took the SAT exam, she scored at the 70th percentile in mathematics.

This means that on the SAT exam, graded on a curve, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Explain the difference in these two scores.

The difference is that Marla's exam in her statistics class was graded by percent of correct answers, in her case 70%, while the SAT is graded into a curve, taking other students' grades also into account, and since she scored in the 70th percentile, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Answer:

60 marbles in total

Step-by-step explanation:

Find how many marbles there are in total by dividing 42 by 0.7:

42/0.7

= 60

So, there are 60 marbles in total

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

10-3=7+2=9

4×9=36

36 is the answer

Answer:

AB IS THE ANSWER !!!!!!!!!!

Answer: AB

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi! I don't know if you need help anymore ,but here you go!

Because BC=ED, I asume that AE=AB

Answer:

[tex] \large{ \tt{❀ \: m \: \angle \: NML= m \: \angle \:QML + m \: \angle \: NMQ}}[/tex]

[tex] \large{ \tt{⤇m \: \angle \:NML= 115 \degree + 28 \degree }}[/tex]

[tex] \boxed{ \large{ \tt{⤇ \: m \: \angle \:NML = 143 \degree }}}[/tex]

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁

Answer:

7 sq unit

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of triagle ABC = Area of rectangle mnBp - Area of trangle AmC - Are of triangle CnB - Area of triangle ABp

Area of rectangle mnBp = 5x3 = 15 sq unit

Area of trangle AmC = 4x2 /2 = 4 sq unit

Are of triangle CnB = 5x1 /2 = 2.5 sq unit

Area of triangle ABp = 3x1 /2 = 1.5 sq unit

I believe you can work out thd answer from the above

Answer:

Yes, P(E1)=P(E2)

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

Number of dice=3

Total outcomes of 1 die=6

Therefore,

Total number of outcomes =[tex]6^3=216[/tex]

E1={{(1,4,6),(2,3,6),(1,5,5),(2,4,5),(3,3,5),(3,4,4)}

E2={(1,5,6),(2,4,6),(3,3,6),(2,5,5),(4,4,4),(3,4,5)}

We have to show that E1 and E2 have the same probability P(E1) = P(E2).

Probability, [tex]P(E)=\frac{Favorable\;outcomes}{Total\;outcomes}[/tex]

Using the formula

[tex]P(E_1)=\frac{6}{216}[/tex]

[tex]P(E_1)=0.0278[/tex]

[tex]P(E_2)=\frac{6}{216}[/tex]

[tex]P(E_2)=0.0278[/tex]

Hence, P(E1)=P(E2)

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

Let mark to be scored in fourth =x

but since the total will be more or above we will have the sign

[tex] \geqslant [/tex]

[tex]91 + 85 + 84 + x \div 4 \geqslant 90[/tex]

[tex]260 + x \div 4 \geqslant 90[/tex]

L.c.m =4 ( cross multiplying)

260+xtex 90*4

260+xtex 360

x tex 360-260

x tex 100

The value of the lowest score Jane can make on her fourth and final quiz is, 100

The process of combining two or more numbers is called the Addition. The 4 main properties of addition are commutative, associative, distributive, and additive identity.

We have to given that;

Jane has earned a 91, 85, and 84 on her first three quizzes of the semester.

And,  she hopes to have an A quiz average (90 or above).

Let us assume that;

her fourth and final quiz = x

Hence, We get;

(91 + 85 + 84 + x) / 4 = 90

260 + x = 360

x = 360 - 260

x = 100

Thus, the lowest score Jane can make on her fourth and final quiz is,

x = 100

Learn more about the addition visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25421984

#SPJ2

Step 1: Find the LCD (Least Common Denominator)

The LCD between 4 and 8 is 8. Therefore, if I change all of the fractions to have a denominator of 8, the problem is as such:

3/8 - 2/8 = ?

Step 2: Subtract

3/8 - 2/8 = 1/8

Hope this helps!

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex] (1/8)

Step-by-step explanation:

8·1=8

4·2=8

LCD=8

If the denominator is multiplied, the numerator also has to be multipled by the same value.

Hope this helped! Please mark brainliest :)

Answer:

$3.22 per square feet

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve, I usually set up an equation:

sq ft  = 12 1/2 = 1

 $        40.21     x

Then, use cross multiplication.

(12 1/2)x=40.21

Divide both sides by 12 1/2 or 12.5

x = 3.2168

Round to the hundredths place [because we're dealing with money]

$3.22

I hope this helps!

Answer:

3.22 per sq ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the total cost and divide by the amount of tiles

40.21 / 12.5

3.2168 per sq ft

Rounding to the nearest cent

3.22 per sq ft

Answer:

If you need further explanation, comment on this

Answer:

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430       ( quantities of regular and Decaf coffee respectevely)

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost of the beans

Brazilian natural   =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.47 + 0.047  

BN  Cost   = 0.517 $/lb

Clombian Mild      =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.62  +  0.062

CM Cost   =  0.682  $/lb

Composition of the coffee blend

Regular coffee     0.75 BN  +  0.25 CM

De Caf   coffee     0.40 BN + 0.60  CM

PRICES

Regular Roman  =  3.60  $

Decaf                   =  4.40  $

Production costs:

Regular Roman  =  0.80  $/lb

Decaf                   =  1.05  $/lb

Packaging costs:   0.25  $/Lb       both

Profit  =  Price  -  cost

Profit  of regular coffee  =  3.60 - 0.80 - 0.25 -Cost of bean

for regular coffee cost of BN + CM

BN   is :   0.75*BN cost  = 0.75*0.517  =  0.38775       and

CM  is : 0.25*0.682   =   0.1705

Profit  of regular coffee  =  1.99175  $

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4 - 1.05 - 0.25 - ( 0.517*0.4 + 0.6*0.682)

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4  - 1.30 - 0.616

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  2.484  $

Let´s call  x₁  pounds of regular coffee   and  x₂   pounds of Decaf coffee then:

 Objective Function is:  

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Regular coffee means:

750 pounds of BN  +  250 pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Decaf coffee means

200 pounds of BN  +   300 pounds of CM

Then   750 + 200  =  900 pounds of BN

And     250 + 300 =  550  pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Decaf  coffee correspond to

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Regular  coffee correspond to

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

Then the model is:

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

General constraints  x₁ ≥ 0      x₂ ≥   0  both integers

After 6 iterations optimal solution  ( maximum z) is

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430  

x₁   and  x₂  are quantities of  Regular and Decaf coffee respectively, to find out quantities of Brazilian Natural and Colombian Mild

we proceed as follows

Regular coffee is :  0.75*968 =   726 pounds of BN

Decaf coffee is :      0.40*430 =   172  pounds of BN

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Regular coffee is :  0.25*968   =  242 pounds of CM

Decaf coffee is :  0.6*430  =  258 pounds of CM

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Answer:

10 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so we know he is getting payed $20 + $7 every hour so what i would do is keep the multiply the 7 till you get 70 so thats 7x10=70 and 70+20=90 so he worked for 10 hours last week :)  i hope this helps, i tried my best to explain it

Answer:

1. -6x + 14 < -28

6x<42

x<7

2.  3x + 28 < 25

3x < -3

x<-1

Hope This Helps!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

so  the equation in standard form that models the given scenario is

2x + 3y = 24

Answer:

6x -15

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in gx for x in fx. So you have 2(3x-9) + 3

Answer:

yes I look this problem in this figure

Answer:

is 22

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It doesn't have a slope?

Step-by-step explanation:

Knowing that the slope equation is y2-y1/x2-x1

9-4       5

----- = ------   = 0

4-4       0

this means that the slope is 0...