Sumas y restas w+y=9 3w-y=11

Answer:

ab=14.4

Step-by-step explanation:

This is going to be tricky to explain over text, so try to bear with me :) You have the information given above. Let's start with just ad = 11.6 for now. since these are variables, it can also be understood be understood as a times d= 11.6.  Knowing this, we can figure out that d = 11.6/a, when you divide both sides by a. You now have d, so plug (11.6/a) into cd=6.7. You have to do the same thing you did last time, except this time you are aiming to get c by itself. So, multiply both sides by a/11.6 and you get c = (6.7a)/ 11.6.  Guess what, you know c now! so you put (6.7a)/11.6 in for c in the equation given to you earlier, bc =8.3. The math gets a bit messy here, but you basically solve for b here, which, when you crunch the numbers down, ends up being ~14.3705 divided by a. You are looking for ab, so just multiply both sides by a, and round to the nearest tenth so that you have ab= 14.4  

Answer:

Just A and C

Step-by-step explanation:

B doesn't count because you would not be looking at the 9. Only the 4.

You only look at one number to the right.

Answer:

A and C are correct, but not B

Step-by-step explanation:

When you round, you only look at the number behind the place you are rounding.

6.04 doesn't round to 6.1, so that is not correct

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

The bar chart to the question is attached below.

The distance traveled by Paolo = 210 m, The distance traveled by Lucas = 150 m, The distance traveled by Jashua = 175 m, The distance traveled by Topher = 190 m

1) The farther distance walk by Paolo = The distance traveled by Paolo - The distance traveled by Topher = 210 m - 190 m = 20 m

2) The farther distance walk by Jasha = The distance traveled by Jashua - The distance traveled by Lucas = 175 m - 150 m = 25 m

3) The farther distance walk by Topher = The distance traveled by Topher - The distance traveled by Lucas = 190 m - 150 m = 40 m

4) Combined distance of Paolo's and Lucas = 210 m + 150 m = 360 m

Combined distance of Jashua and Topher = 175 m + 190 m = 365 m

Therefore the Combined distance of Jashua and Topher is more

5) Average distance = (210 + 150 + 175 + 190)/4 = 181.25 m

Answer:

-15.875

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we can sum up the first 5 terms.

-8 + (-4) = -12

-12 + (-2) = -14

-14 + (-1) = -15

-15 + (-1/2) = -15.5

Next, we can find a pattern in the data. We can tell that the next number is one half of the current number. For example, -4 is one half of -8. To find the next number, we simply multiply our current number by one half. Thus, the sixth number is -1/4 and the seventh is -1/8. Adding these to our current total, we have

-15.5 - 1/4 = -15.75

-15.5 - 1/8 = -15.875 as our answer

Answer:

B. -21.012÷ -3.4

its yr correct ans.

hope it helps

Answer:maybe B?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

In slope-intercept form [tex]y=mx+b[/tex], [tex]m[/tex] represents the slope of the line.

Let's write [tex]3x+4y=-2[/tex] in slope-intercept form by isolating [tex]y[/tex]:

[tex]3x+4y=-2,\\4y=-3x-2,\\y=-\frac{3}{4}x-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, the slope of this line is [tex]\frac{-3}{4}[/tex]. To find the slope of a line perpendicular to it, multiply the reciprocal of the slope by -1 (take the negative reciprocal).

Therefore, the slope of a line perpendicular to [tex]3x+4y=-2[/tex] is:

[tex]m_{perp}=-(-\frac{4}{3})=\boxed{\frac{4}{3}}[/tex]

Answer:

4/3

Given equation :-

Slope :-

Slope of perpendicular line :-

Answer:

this is the answer I got! i don't know if it helps, but I hope it does

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since you have this categorized under college math, I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you're in calculus. We will solve using the position function and its first derivative (velocity) to solve. Remember that at an object's max height, the velocity is 0.

If the position function is

[tex]s(t)=-16t^2+24t+7[/tex] the first derivative, velocity, is

v(t) = -32t + 24. Set this equal to 0 to find the time when the object is at its max height:

0 = -32t + 24 and

-24 = -32t so

t = .75 seconds. Now we can plug that time into the position function to find where it is at that time. This "where" will be the max height:

s(.75) = [tex]-16(.75)^2+24(.75)+7[/tex] so

s(.75) = 16 feet

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  A.  yes

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonals of a rectangle are congruent and bisect each other.

The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other. If they are also congruent, then the parallelogram is a rectangle.

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Press option yes

Answer:

First one , 0.0000805

Step-by-step explanation:

With negative exponents the decimal is moved to the left the amount of the exponent. The spaces are filled with zeros.

With positive exponents the opposite occurs.  The decimal moves to the right.

Answer:

1200

Explanation:

Order does not matter, if we said xyz order, it would still not make a difference if it was zyx or yzx hence we use the combination formula:

nCr = n! / r! * (n - r)!

where n= total number of items

r= number of items chosen at a time

Combinations are used when the order of events do not matter in calculating the outcome.

We calculate using the formula:

(30×20×12)÷3!=1200

There are therefore 1200 ways for the three distinct items to not be in same row or column

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  a) yes

  b) see attached

  c) see discussion

  d) neither

  e) increasing (2,5); decreasing (-2, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The graph passes the vertical line test, so is the graph of a function.

__

b) A table of values is attached

__

c) Generally, this sort of function would be defined piecewise:

  [tex]\displaystyle f(x)=\begin{cases}-\dfrac{1}{2}x+1&\text{for }-2\le x<2\\2x-4&\text{for }2\le x \le5\end{cases}[/tex]

In the attachment, we have shown the use of the "maximum" function to define it. The effect is the same.

__

d) The function has no symmetry about the origin or the y-axis, so is neither odd nor even.

__

e) The function is increasing where the line has positive slope, on the interval (2, 5). The function is decreasing where the line has negative slope, on the interval (-2, 2).

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3 of 27 is 9. 9 times 2 is 18.

Answer:

hey what's

Step-by-step explanation:

a question wow okay the answer is

Answer:

the answers are on the picture but the numbers may be rounded

Answer:

w = 5

y = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

w + y = 9

3w - y = 11 ( + )

________

4w + 0 = 20

4w = 20

w = 20 / 4

w = 5

Substitute w = 5 in eq. w + y = 9,

w + y = 9

5 + y = 9

y = 9 - 5

y = 4

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

4x-3 + 3 =  5 + 3

4x = 8

4x ÷ 4 = 8 ÷ 4

x = 2

Hi there!  

»»————-　★　————-««

I believe your answer is:  

"When solving 4x-3=5 the property used in the first step is the addition property of equality."

[tex]\boxed{x = 2}[/tex]

»»————-　★　————-««  

Here’s why:  

⸻⸻⸻⸻

⸻⸻⸻⸻

[tex]\boxed{\text{Solving for 'x'....}}\\\\4x-3=5\\----------\\\text{\textbf{Addition Property of Equality:} Add three on both sides.}}\\\\\rightarrow 4x - 3 = 5 \\\rightarrow 4x -3 + 3 = 5 + 3\\\\\rightarrow \boxed{4x = 8}\\\\\text{\textbf{Division Property of Equality:} Divide both sides by 4.}}\\\\\rightarrow {4x=8}\\\rightarrow \frac{4x=8}{4}\\\\\rightarrow \boxed{x = 2}[/tex]

⸻⸻⸻⸻

»»————-　★　————-««  

Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.  

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] ({8}^{ { - 9})^{ \frac{ - x}{9} } } [/tex]

when putting a power to another power, then these two powers are multiplied.

so, -9 × (-x/9) = (-9 × -x) / 9 = 9x/9 = x

so, this reduces to the original

[tex] {8}^{x} [/tex]

and therefore C is the right answer.

Answer: Tis 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

52nd percentile

Step-by-step explanation:

The sorted data :

36.0, 37.0, 39.5, 40.0, 40.5, 43.0, 44.0, 45.5, 45.5, 46.5, 48.0, 48.00, 49.0, 50.0, 51.5, 52.5, 53.0, 53.5, 54.0, 57.3, 57.5, 58.0, 58.5, 59.0, 59.5, 60.0, 61.0, 61.0, 61.0, 61.5, 62.0, 62.5, 63.0, 63.0, 63.5, 64.0, 64.0, 64.0, 64.5, 65.0, 66.0, 67.5, 67.5, 68.5, 70.0, 70.5, 71.5, 72.0, 72.5, 72.5, 72.5, 73.5, 74.5, 77.5

The total size of the data = 54

The value 61.0 occurs in position ; 27th, 28th and 29th

Taking the position average :

(27+28+29)/3 = 84/3 = 28th position

This means the percentile score of 61 is :

(Position average / total size) * 100%

(28/54) * 100%

0.5185185 * 100%

= 51.85%

This means that 61 inch length falls in the 52nd percentile

Answer:

Hello friend kya in snap and p to Trisha

Answer:

[tex]90[/tex] [tex]ft^3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

----------------------------------------

The formula to find the volume of a rectangular prism is   [tex]V=lwh[/tex]

Let's substitute the number for the length, width, and height now.

[tex]V=(6)(5)(3)[/tex]

[tex]V=(30)(3)[/tex]

[tex]V=90[/tex]

--------------------

Hope this is helpful.

Answer:

T = 2.215

df = 7

Critical value = 2.364

Fail to reject the null

Step-by-step explanation:

Swimmer __Spandex __Speedo Fastskin__ d

1 __________31.1 _______29.1 __ 2

2_________ 28.9 ______30.4 __ -1.5

3_________ 31.4 ______ 32.0 __ - 0.6

4_________ 34.9 ______31.7 __ 3.2

5 _________27.7 ______28.2 __ - 0.5

6_________ 36.7 _____ 32.9 ___ 3.8

7 _________ 33.3 _____28.6 ___ 4.7

8_________ 30.8 _____26.2 ___ 4.6

The mean difference = Σd / n

2, - 1.5, - 0.6, 3.2, - 0.5, 3.8, 4.7, 4.6

μd = Σd / n = 15.7 / 8 = 1.9625

Sd = standard deviation of difference = 2.5065 (using calculator)

H0 : μd = 0

H1 : μd ≠ 0

The test statistic:

T = μd / (Sd/√n)

T = 1.9625 / (2.5065/√8)

T = 2.2145574

The degree of freedom, df = n - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7

Using a Pvalue calculator :

α = 0.05

Critical value, Tcritical = 2.364 (T distribution table)

Since Test statistic < Critical value

we fail to reject H0 ;

Answer:

[tex]\frac{x+6}{2x^2-9x+5}=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(-2)^{n}x^{n} + \frac{x^{n}}{5^{n+1}}][/tex]

when:

[tex]|x|<\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve this problem, we must begin by splitting the function into its partial fractions, so we must first factor the denominator.

[tex]\frac{x+6}{2x^2-9x+5}=\frac{x+6}{(2x+1)(x-5)}[/tex]

Next, we can build our partial fractions, like this:

[tex]\frac{x+6}{(2x+1)(x-5)}=\frac{A}{2x+1}+\frac{B}{x-5}[/tex]

we can then add the two fraction on the right to get:

[tex]\frac{x+6}{(2x+1)(x-5)}=\frac{A(x-5)+B(2x+1)}{(2x+1)(x-5)}[/tex]

Since we need this equation to be equivalent, we can get rid of the denominators and set the numerators equal to each other, so we get:

[tex]x+6=A(x-5)+B(2x+1)[/tex]

and expand:

[tex]x+6=Ax-5A+2Bx+B[/tex]

we can now group the terms so we get:

[tex]x+6=Ax+2Bx-5A+B[/tex]

[tex]x+6=(Ax+2Bx)+(-5A+B)[/tex]

and factor:

[tex]x+6=(A+2B)x+(-5A+B)[/tex]

so we can now build a system of equations:

A+2B=1

-5A+B=6

and solve simultaneously, this one can be solved by substitution, so we get>

A=1-2B

-5(1-2B)+B=6

-5+10B+B=6

11B=11

B=1

A=1-2(1)

A=-1

So we can use these values to build our partial fractions:

[tex]\frac{x+6}{(2x+1)(x-5)}=\frac{A}{2x+1}+\frac{B}{x-5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x+6}{(2x+1)(x-5)}=-\frac{1}{2x+1}+\frac{1}{x-5}[/tex]

and we can now use the partial fractions to build our series. Let's start with the first fraction:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2x+1}[/tex]

We can rewrite this fraction as:

[tex]-\frac{1}{1-(-2x)}[/tex]

We can now use the following rule to build our power fraction:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ar^{n} = \frac{a}{1-r}[/tex]

when |r|<1

in this case a=1 and r=-2x so:

[tex]-\frac{1}{1-(-2x)}=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-2x)^n[/tex]

or

[tex]-\frac{1}{1-(-2x)}=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-2)^{n} x^{n}[/tex]

for: |-2x|<1

or: [tex] |x|<\frac{1}{2} [/tex]

Next, we can work with the second fraction:

[tex]\frac{1}{x-5}[/tex]

On which we can factor a -5 out so we get:

[tex]-\frac{1}{5(1-\frac{x}{5})}[/tex]

In this case: a=-1/5 and r=x/5

so our series will look like this:

[tex]-\frac{1}{5(1-\frac{x}{5})}=-\frac{1}{5}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (\frac{x}{5})^n[/tex]

Which can be simplified to:

[tex]-\frac{1}{5(1-\frac{x}{5})}=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{5^(n+1)}[/tex]

when:

[tex]|\frac{x}{5}|<1[/tex]

or

|x|<5

So we can now put all the series together to get:

[tex]\frac{x+6}{2x^2-9x+5}=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(-2)^{n}x^{n} + \frac{x^{n}}{5^{n+1}}}[/tex]

when:

[tex]|x|<\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

We use the smallest interval of convergence for x since that's the one the whole series will be defined for.

Answer:

three

P A R

A R A D

A D I S E 

P Q R

A B C D

A B C D E

There are three such pairs of letters. 

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.0066 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to conclude that the mean salary differs from $39,385

Step-by-step explanation:

The average salary for public school teachers for a specific year was reported to be $39,385. Test if the mean salary differs from $39,385

At the null hypothesis, we test if the mean is of $39,385, that is:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 39385[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the mean differs from this, that is:

[tex]H_1: \mu \neq 39385[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

39385 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 39385[/tex]

A random sample of 50 public school teachers in a particular state had a mean of $41,680, and the population standard deviation is $5975.

This means that [tex]n = 50, X = 41680, \sigma = 5975[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{41680 - 39385}{\frac{5975}{\sqrt{50}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 2.72[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability that the sample mean differs from 39385 by at least 2295, which is P(|Z| > 2.72), which is 2 multiplied by the p-value of Z = -2.72.

Looking at the z-table, Z = -2.72 has a p-value of 0.0033

2*0.0033 = 0.0066

The p-value of the test is 0.0066 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to conclude that the mean salary differs from $39,385