The graph below has the same shape as the graph of G(x) = x, but it is
shifted three units to the left. Complete its equation. Enter exponents using
the caret (-); for example, enter x as x^4. Do not include "G(x) =" in your
answer.
G(x) =

Answer:

[tex]-\dfrac{2}{17} + \dfrac{9}{17}i[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] (2 + i) \div (1 - 4i) = [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{2 + i}{1 - 4i} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{2 + i}{1 - 4i} \times \dfrac{1 + 4i}{1 + 4i} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{(2 + i)(1 + 4i)}{(1 - 4i)(1 + 4i)} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{2 + 8i + i + 4i^2}{1 + 16} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{2 + 9i - 4}{17} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{-2 + 9i}{17} [/tex]

[tex]= -\dfrac{2}{17} + \dfrac{9}{17}i[/tex]

Answer:

350

Step-by-step explanation:

400- 80 ( 20% discount)

=320+30(loss)

=350

Answer:

[tex]g(x) = -x^2 + 3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex]

Required

Determine g(x)

First, shift f(x) down by 3 units

The rule is:

[tex]f'(x) = f(x) - 3[/tex]

So:

[tex]f'(x) = x^2 - 3[/tex]

Next, reflect f'(x) across the x-axis to get g(x)

The rule is:

[tex]g(x) = -f(x)[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]g(x) = -(x^2 - 3)[/tex]

Open bracket

[tex]g(x) = -x^2 + 3[/tex]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

I figured out the hard way

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

When we reflect something across the y axis, the y axis stays the same but the x values change by a factor of -1.

B is the Answer

Answer:

c. switch the x-values and y-values in the table

Step-by-step explanation:

For any table or graph reflection over the line y=x

The rule is (x,y) ----> (y,x)

f(x) is reflected over the line y=x, so the coordinates of f(x) becomes

(-2,-31) becomes (-31,-2)

(-1,0) becomes (0,-1)

(1,2) becomes (2,1)

(2,33) becomes (33,2)

As per the rule, we switch the x-values and y-values in the table

For reflection over the line y=x , the coordinate becomes

(-31,-2)

(0,-1)

(2,1)

(33,2)

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The minimum point of the curve is (2, 0). Hence, axis of symmetry is x = 2

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Each f(x) increases by 8 therefore this equation is a linear function. If you where to graph it would be a straight line

Hope this helped :)

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is the same between all pounts which means the function is linear.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

(1) Ordinal

(2) Such data should not be used for calculations such as an average.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]1 \to Low[/tex]

[tex]2 \to Medium[/tex]

[tex]3 \to High[/tex]

[tex]Average = 1.3[/tex]

Solving (a): The level of measurement

When observations are presented in ranks such as:

[tex]1 \to Low[/tex]

[tex]2 \to Medium[/tex]

[tex]3 \to High[/tex]

The level of measurement of such observation is ordinal

Solving (b): What is wrong with the computation?

Ordinal level of measurement are not numerical values whose average can be calculated because they are used as ranks.

Hence, (a) is correct

Answer:

Terms:

Like Terms:

Coefficients:

Constants:

You simplify the expression by combining like terms:

-5x + 4 - x - 1 = -6x + 5

(7b - 4) + (-2b + a + 1) = 7b - 4 - 2b + a + 1 = 5b + a - 3

Answer:

$3.22 per square feet

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve, I usually set up an equation:

sq ft  = 12 1/2 = 1

 $        40.21     x

Then, use cross multiplication.

(12 1/2)x=40.21

Divide both sides by 12 1/2 or 12.5

x = 3.2168

Round to the hundredths place [because we're dealing with money]

$3.22

I hope this helps!

Answer:

3.22 per sq ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the total cost and divide by the amount of tiles

40.21 / 12.5

3.2168 per sq ft

Rounding to the nearest cent

3.22 per sq ft

Answer:

There is no significance evidence that students who completed two years of college had a higher average than students who had only completed high school.

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypothesis :

H0 : μ1 = μ2

H1 : μ1 > μ2

Given :

n1 = 35 ; x1 = 75.1 ; s1 = 12.8

n2 = 50 ; x2 = 72.1 ; s2 = 14.6

Pooled variance = Sp² = (df1*s1² + df2*s2²) ÷ (n1 + n2 - 2)

df1 = n1 - 1 = 35 - 1 = 34

df2 = n2 - 1 = 50 - 1 = 49

(x1 - x2) ÷ Sp(√(1/n1 + 1/n2))

Sp² = (34*12.8^2 + 49*14.6^2) / (35+50-2)

Sp² = (5570.56 + 10444.84) / 83

Sp² = 192.95662

Sp = √192.95662

Sp = 13.89

Test statistic = (75.1 - 72.1) / 13.89 * √(1/35 + 1/50)

Test statistic = 3 / (13.89 * 0.2203892)

Test statistic = 0.980

df = n1 + n2 - 2

df = 35 + 50 - 2 = 83

Using the Pvalue calculator :

Pvalue(0.980, 83) = 0.165

α = 0.1

Pvalue > α ; We fail to reject the H0; and conclude that there is no significance evidence that students who completed two years of college had a higher average than students who had only completed high school.

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

10-3=7+2=9

4×9=36

36 is the answer

Answer:

v=-6 or 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer would be 5

Step-by-step explanation:

have to do the question multiply add and divide to find your answer

Answer:

The price of 1 exercise book is $122.45.

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is solved using a system of equations.

I am going to say that:

x is the price of one exercise book.

y is the price of one textbook.

Total cost of 10 exercise books and 2 textbooks is $1400.00.

This means that:

[tex]10x + 2y = 1400[/tex]

Since we want x:

[tex]2y = 1400 - 10x[/tex]

[tex]y = 700 - 5x[/tex]

One also finds the total cost of 3 textbooks and 30 exercise books is $3000.

This means that:

[tex]3x + 30y = 3000[/tex]

Since [tex]y = 700 - 5x[/tex]

[tex]3x + 30(700 - 5x) = 3000[/tex]

[tex]3x + 21000 - 150x = 3000[/tex]

[tex]147x = 18000[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{18000}{147}[/tex]

[tex]x = 122.45[/tex]

The price of 1 exercise book is $122.45.

Answer:

Well, divide the shape into rectangles,

triangles or other shapes after that, you can find the area of and then add the areas back together.

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of composite shapes is defined as the area covered by any composite shape. A composite shape is made up of basic shapes put together. Thus, the area of the composite shape is found by individually adding all the basic shapes.

To calculate the area of a composite shape you must divide the shape into rectangles, triangles or other shapes you can find the area of and then add the areas back together.es

Answer:

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430       ( quantities of regular and Decaf coffee respectevely)

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost of the beans

Brazilian natural   =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.47 + 0.047  

BN  Cost   = 0.517 $/lb

Clombian Mild      =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.62  +  0.062

CM Cost   =  0.682  $/lb

Composition of the coffee blend

Regular coffee     0.75 BN  +  0.25 CM

De Caf   coffee     0.40 BN + 0.60  CM

PRICES

Regular Roman  =  3.60  $

Decaf                   =  4.40  $

Production costs:

Regular Roman  =  0.80  $/lb

Decaf                   =  1.05  $/lb

Packaging costs:   0.25  $/Lb       both

Profit  =  Price  -  cost

Profit  of regular coffee  =  3.60 - 0.80 - 0.25 -Cost of bean

for regular coffee cost of BN + CM

BN   is :   0.75*BN cost  = 0.75*0.517  =  0.38775       and

CM  is : 0.25*0.682   =   0.1705

Profit  of regular coffee  =  1.99175  $

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4 - 1.05 - 0.25 - ( 0.517*0.4 + 0.6*0.682)

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4  - 1.30 - 0.616

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  2.484  $

Let´s call  x₁  pounds of regular coffee   and  x₂   pounds of Decaf coffee then:

 Objective Function is:  

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Regular coffee means:

750 pounds of BN  +  250 pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Decaf coffee means

200 pounds of BN  +   300 pounds of CM

Then   750 + 200  =  900 pounds of BN

And     250 + 300 =  550  pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Decaf  coffee correspond to

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Regular  coffee correspond to

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

Then the model is:

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

General constraints  x₁ ≥ 0      x₂ ≥   0  both integers

After 6 iterations optimal solution  ( maximum z) is

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430  

x₁   and  x₂  are quantities of  Regular and Decaf coffee respectively, to find out quantities of Brazilian Natural and Colombian Mild

we proceed as follows

Regular coffee is :  0.75*968 =   726 pounds of BN

Decaf coffee is :      0.40*430 =   172  pounds of BN

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Regular coffee is :  0.25*968   =  242 pounds of CM

Decaf coffee is :  0.6*430  =  258 pounds of CM

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Answer:

58.80

Step-by-step explanation:

84 x .7(70%) =58.80

Answer:

10 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so we know he is getting payed $20 + $7 every hour so what i would do is keep the multiply the 7 till you get 70 so thats 7x10=70 and 70+20=90 so he worked for 10 hours last week :)  i hope this helps, i tried my best to explain it

Answer:

That number is 39

Answer:

2 1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

7/8 is the same as 0.875 and therefore you need 0.125 also known as 1/8 to make it a whole number. When you add it to the already existing whole 2 you get three. Subtract three from five to make two which is what you need to add on top to finally get 5.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

so let the equation equal 13

13 = 3[tex]x^{3}[/tex]-12x+13

so when ever 3[tex]x^{3}[/tex]-12x=0  then this is equation is true, soooo

x (3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 12) =0

so when x = 0  this is true, but also when

3[tex]x^{2}[/tex]-12=0   also

3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] = 12

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] = 4

x = 2

so when x = 2  or -2  or 0  ,  then this is true

Answer:

division is right i hope you understand

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  Multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount Jaylene got back is 90% of the amount she spent. That value is found by multiplying 90% times $20.

Jaylene got back ...

  90% × $20 = $18

Answer:

The difference is that Marla's exam in her statistics class was graded by percent of correct answers, in her case 70%, while the SAT is graded into a curve, taking other students' grades also into account, and since she scored in the 70th percentile, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Step-by-step explanation:

Marla scored 70% on her last unit exam in her statistics class.

This means that in her statistics class, Marla got 70% of her test correct.

When Marla took the SAT exam, she scored at the 70th percentile in mathematics.

This means that on the SAT exam, graded on a curve, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Explain the difference in these two scores.

The difference is that Marla's exam in her statistics class was graded by percent of correct answers, in her case 70%, while the SAT is graded into a curve, taking other students' grades also into account, and since she scored in the 70th percentile, Marla scored better than 70% of the students.

Answer:

[tex]{ \tt{y = 8 - 3x}} - - - (i) \\ \\ = > 7x - 4(8 - 3x) = 6 \\ 7x - 32 + 12x = 6 \\ 19x - 32 = 6 \\ 19x = 38 \\ x = 2 \\ \\ = > y = 8 - 3(2) \\ y = 2[/tex]

Answer:

The numerical values of the circumference and area of the circle are equal.

Answer:

is 22

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It doesn't have a slope?

Step-by-step explanation:

Knowing that the slope equation is y2-y1/x2-x1

9-4       5

----- = ------   = 0

4-4       0

this means that the slope is 0...

Answer:

2 < x < 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x/10

1/5 = 2/10

.6 = 6/10

2 < x < 6

Answer:

56.5 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Because complementary angles are when their sum is 90, you get the equation:

P + Q = 90

Since Q is 33.5,

P + 33.5 = 90

Subtracting 33.5 from both sides,

P = 56.5

Answer:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.95}{2} = 0.025[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.025 = 0.975[/tex], so Z = 1.96.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

Standard deviation of 3 hours.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 3[/tex]

The 95% level of confidence is to be used. How many executives should be surveyed?

n executives should be surveyed, and n is found with [tex]M = 0.25[/tex]. So

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25 = 1.96\frac{3}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25\sqrt{n} = 1.96*3[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{1.96*3}{0.25}[/tex]

[tex](\sqrt{n})^2 = (\frac{1.96*3}{0.25})^2[/tex]

[tex]n = 553.2[/tex]

Rounding up:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Answer: [tex]x\in (0,1)\cup (4,\infty)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

In equality is [tex]x^3+4x>5x^2[/tex]

Taking terms one side

[tex]\Rightarrow x^3-5x^2+4x>0\\\Rightarrow x(x^2-5x+4)>0\\\Rightarrow x(x^2-4x-x+4)>0\\\Rightarrow x(x-4)(x-1)>0\\\Rightarrow (x-0)(x-1)(x-4)>0[/tex]

Using wavy curve method

[tex]x\in (0,1)\cup (4,\infty)[/tex]

Answer:

y = 5x + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the coordinate points (0,1) and (5,0)

First, get the slope

Slope m =(0-1)/5-0

m = -1/5

Since the required line is perpendicular, then the required slope is;

M = -1/(-1/5)

M = 5

Since 1the y intecept id (0,1) i.e. 1

Required equation is y = mx+b

y = 5x + 1

This gives the required equation

Note that the coordinate (0,1) was used instead os (0,0)