red lie are lies to harm others
Explanation:
example:
Danice: Mr William Jake took your phone and smashed it on the ground
Mr William: What?
* Then Mr William argued with Jake and scolded him so therefore Danice told a red lie*
Hope it helps
A claim made with full knowledge that the opposing person already knows it to be untrue.
What is a red lie?Red lies are just about retaliation and spite. The desire to hurt others, regardless at the cost of one's own harm, drives them. "A brilliant red lie" refers to a complete fabrication or something wholly at variance with the truth. The phrase "a red stranger" is another way we describe an individual who is a complete stranger.
An example of a red lie will is:
Even though you detest the meatloaf, you proclaim to your mother that it is excellent. You do not wish to tell her buddy that she's gained a significant amount of weight and appears heavy, so you respond as she asks saying he doesn't look big in her dress. In this, there is a red lie that is presented.
Learn more about red lie, here:
https://brainly.com/question/25427223
#SPJ2
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation:
What is a warranty?
(A) It is a stipulation about the contract.
(B) It is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract
(C) It is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
(D) It is a statement of commendation by the seller.
Answer:
C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money
Essay on civil and criminal laws on malaysia?
Answer:
are various definitions of the term “legal system”. A Legal System is the framework of rules and institutions within a nation regulating individual’s relations with one another and between them and the government.(Book) In this world, there are many types of legal systems, but the few major legal sytems of the world today are civil law, common law, customary law, religious law, socialist and mixed law systems.
Civil law is the dominant legal tradition today in most of Europe, all of Central and South America, parts of Asia and Africa, and even some discrete areas of the common-law world, like Louisiana and Quebec. The origin of civil law is from the Roman law. The civil law is a set out of comprehensive system of rules which are applied and interpreted by judges. Besides that, civil law is older, more widely distributed and in many ways more influential than the common law.
Common law is a system of law that is derived from judges’ decisions, rather than statutes or constitutions. It is based on tradition, past practices and legal precedents set by courts through interpretation of statues, legal legislation, and past rulings.It is english origin and is found in United States and other countries with strong english influences
Customary law is a traditional common rule or practice that has become an intrinsic part of the accepted and expected conduct in a community, profession, or trade and is treated as a legal requirement. Not many countries in the world today will operate under a legal system which could be wholly customary. However, customary law still plays a sometimes significant role, like in the matters of personal conduct, in many countries or political entities with mixed legal systems.
Islamic law is derived from the interpretation of the Koran. Its primary objective is social justice, but also includes property rights, economic decision making, and types of economic freedom. Islamic law is mostly found in Pakistan, Iran, and other Islamic states.
Socialist law is based on fundamental tenets of Marxist-socialist state and center on concept of economic, political, and social policies of the state. It can be found in some independent states of the former Soviet Union, China and other Marxist-socialist states.
A mixed legal system is a mixture of two or more legal system practised by some countries.
2.0 Malaysia’s Legal System
Different country practices different types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while others practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example, practices the mixed legal system which includes the Common Law, Islamic law and Customary Law. Malaysia’s legal system comprises laws which have arise from three significant periods in Malaysian history dating from the Malacca Sultanate, to the spread of Islam to Southeast Asia, and following the absorption into the indigenous culture of British colonial rule which introduced a constitutional government and the common law. Malaysia’s unique legal system is designed to balance the delicate racial and religious needs of its heterogeneous people. The Malaysian legal system law can be classified into two . However, according to the democratic ruling system, the Chief Executive is the Prime Minister. This does not mean that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is unable to voice any opinion, but rather that he must act on government advice, whatever his personal view might be. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints a Cabinet to advise him on country’s matter. The Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and a number of Ministers who must all be members of Parliament. Besides that, the Government has set up various agencies to ensure the smooth enforcement of the law. It comprised of three main components, namely ministries, departments and statutory bodies.
laws pertaining to persons professing the religion of Islam.
Share this:
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
OSCOLA
APA
MLA
MLA-7
Harvard
Vancouver
Wikipedia
All ltd, 'L
Trustedsite Law
Brown v. Board, Main points, argument, and violations. I am expecting a decent paragraph! (10 Sentence!) Majority Opinion for the brief also!
Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
