What is your attitude towards teaching young children? Please help me

Answer:

positive

Explanation:

they help people ,and they also volunteer love

1) Unprotected sexual activities.

2) Stong addiction of drugs and alcohol.

3) Addiction of different casino games which can cause financial damages.

4) Involvement in illegal works for easy earnings.

5) Under-age driving of different two wheeler or four wheeler vehicles.

6) Involvement in political parties where they might face different threatening situations.

Answer:

Rebecca: "What if I leave class a little bit early? That way you can hang out with your brother and your friends, even if you're late to the game.

Explanation:

The compromising conflict style is a conflict management style that aims to bring a little compromise to the demands of all parties involved in a conflict in order to bring a balance or arrive at a common ground that at least brings a solution/cooperation and ends the conflict. This is what happens in the above example where Rebecca tries to compromise a little so that Tom could go for his poker and in that way there is no conflict.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The roles of institutions in supporting human rights violation​ are basically to protect every individual on planet earth, independently of its country, race, ethnicity, color of skin, gender, education level, or financial situation, against the abuse of power from tyrannic or authoritarian governments.

Human rights can be achieved around the world through the kind of education that promotes respect for human rights and through the overseeing of the United Nations members that are committed to ensuring the acceptance and attention of these rights in their respective nations.

We are talking about the Human Rights Declaration, an important document signed by the member states of the United Nations. It was signed on December 10, 1948, under the name of "Resolution 217. It was signed in Paris, France. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights has thirty articles that support human rights throughout the world.

Answer:

the correct answer is A thanks

Answer:

I don't need image of one you before lithium Bellingham sodium magnesium

Answer:

Where are the elements?

Explanation:

I need a question that can be answered. just put what elements and im sure someone will help.

Answer:

I think Europe was most Americans artist studied

Answer:

c

c

Explanation:

c the namib Desert because the desert is around the landscape

Answer:

Migration is important for the transfer of manpower and skills and provides the needed knowledge and innovation for global growth. In order to address the issues raised by global migration, it is necessary to improve international coordination.

Hope it helps....

Prior to the U.S. military campaign against the Islamic State that began in summer 2014, executive branch

officials made statements that included certain interpretations2

concerning the 2001 AUMF, including the

following:

- The 2001 AUMF is primarily an authorization to enter into and prosecute an armed

conflict against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

- The 2001 AUMF authorizes the President to use military force against Al Qaeda and the

Taliban outside Afghanistan, but such uses of force must meet a higher standard of threat

to the United States and must use limited, precise methods against specific individual

targets rather than general military action against enemy forces.

- Because the 2001 AUMF authorizes U.S. involvement in an international armed conflict,

the international law of armed conflict informs the authority within the 2001 AUMF. This

law permits the use of military force against forces associated with Al Qaeda and the

Taliban as co-belligerents; such forces must be operating in some sort of coordination and

cooperation with Al Qaeda and/or the Taliban, not just share similar goals, objectives, or

ideologies.

This interpretation of the scope of 2001 AUMF authority can be seen to fit within the overall framework

of presidential power to use military force against those posing a threat to U.S. national security and U.S.

interests

In situations where the 2001 AUMF or other relevant legislation does not seem to authorize a

given use of military force or related activity, the executive branch will determine whether the President's

Article II powers as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive, as interpreted by the executive branch

itself, might authorize such actions. In this way, similar U.S. military action to meet U.S. counterterrorism

objectives might be interpreted to fall under different authorities, of which the 2001 AUMF is just one,

albeit important, example.

December 2016 Legal Framework Report on Use of Military Force

President Obama issued a report in December 2016 entitled, “Report on the Legal and Policy Frameworks

Guiding the United States’ Use of Military Force, and Related National Security Operations.”4 Among

other matters, the Report deals with the legal justification for the United States’ ongoing use of military

force against the Islamic State, which according to the Report has taken place in the form of airstrikes,

military advising and training of Iraqi security forces and Syrian rebel groups, and military activities of

U.S. special operations forces in Iraq, Syria, and Libya.5 The Report asserts that such use of force is

authorized by the 2001 AUMF, arguing certain factors.

Answer:

Ethics are best define as the moral philosophy, the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad and morally right and wrong. The term is also applied to any system or theory of moral values or principles.

People use traditions as a way to navigate through their societies. These are shared beliefs that allow people to connect with others and have a common understanding of the world around them.

Ethics are best defined as " basic beliefs about what is right or wrong".

Any philosophical theory of what is morally right and wrong, morally good and bad and any system or code of moral norms, principles, or values may be referred to as ethics. The latter can be linked to specific religions, civilizations, professions, or nearly any other group that is defined at least in part by its moral attitude.

To know more about traditions, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/18329818

Answer:

A merchant who is an Athenian citizen

Explanation:

In the ancient Greece, commerce is considered as the major income sources. Both the tradesmen and the merchants were indulged in doing commercial activities. "Merchant" is a term which is referred to the skilled businessmen or the craftsmen who is in control of the general business and therefore, they are called as the traders. Traders includes jewelers, sculptors, painters, architects, stonemasons, bakers and many more.

The ancient Athens city was very beautiful and well maintained city. It is highly developed and civilized. Business and commerce is the main source of income during those in Athens city.

In ancient Greece, children of the merchants played with toys made of mud and clays, learned with private tutors nut in modern days, the children of the merchants went abroad to get good quality education.  In the modern days, only the businesses that have been operating with free men.

Hello. You did not inform the time period in which this increase in NOW membership occurred, which prevents me from telling you about a specific event. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

NOW refers to the National Organization for Women, which is an American institution that seeks to protect and strengthen the rights of women in the country. This institution had a large increase in membership in the 1960s because it was heavily influenced by civil rights movements. As civil rights was a very specific and recurrent subject at that time, many women, also socially devalued and prevented from having their rights, took advantage of this moment to claim their causes, which increased the number of adhesions and supporters to NOW.

Answer and Explanation:

Judicial review is the term used to describe a court's ability to validate or invalidate judicial or administrative decisions when they are deemed improper or unconstitutional. In other words, this is the ability of the judiciary to revoke a decision within its sphere or in other spheres. A court decision, on the other hand, is the sentence given by a judge or court in any type of case they assess.

In a case involving robbery, while the court decision determines the punishment for those involved and the laws applied to the case, the judicial review has the function of analyzing whether the court decision is constitutional and if it is within the appropriate legislative and legal concepts.

Answer:

Explanation

Explanation:

The Above passage is an Explanation ( a very detailed explanation to why a radio signal carrying Morse code on a continuous wave should be used in conveying information instead of the use of a Modulated radio signal ).

Also This is because the passage sheds light on some uncommon knowledge hence we will categorize it as an explanation.

Hello. You did not submit the text that this question refers to. This makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

Evidence is proof, which confirms to the reader that a certain statement is true, because it has facts that justify it. These facts can be statistical, scientific, social, or any other type of proven and certified information. In this case, a text is able to show that there is a type of secondary school capable of better equipping students, if it shows a comparison between the types of secondary schools, where one of them has a much larger number of students who received high academic honors in the college. In this case, you should search, in the text, for statistical data, which show that one type of school is superior, or not, to the others, in this matter.

Answer:

Rarely.

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is - B. propaganda promoting total war efforts.

Explanation:

The given poster is the Canadian propaganda poster during World War 2, various authors, filmmakers, and journalists generated propaganda to influence the citizen of the country towards promoting the war effort.

They are the new media, including cinema (film), newsreels, and radio to influence the population nationwide and overseas. Thus, these poster are example of propaganda promoting total war efforts.

Answer:

12:52 p.m.

Explanation:

The lines of longitude are imaginary lines running from north pole to south pole. This lines are west or east of prime meridian. The lines of longitude are used to determine the local time. Also, the lines of longitude along with the lines of latitude are used to determine the exact location of a place.

Given that at point A(82°E), the time is 1 p.m., Point B is at 80°E.

Difference in degrees between point A and B = 80° - 82° = -2°

1° = 4 minutes, hence 2° = 8 minutes

Therefore point B is 8 minutes behind of point A. The time at place B is 12:52 p.m.

Answer:

Nevada is almost like a desert, so it gets very dry there. People probably have to be indoors alot because of the heat

Answer:A) a developed economy

Explanation:

100% on edge

Answer:

H conflict/change

Explanation:

Answer:

D) Babur

Explanation:

The Mughal Empire was founded by Babur in 1526. Check out the pic bellow.

Hope this helps!

-kiniwih426

Answer:

What is the importance of greenhouse effect?

The greenhouse effect is a process that occurs when gases in Earth's atmosphere trap the Sun's heat. This process makes Earth much warmer than it would be without an atmosphere. The greenhouse effect is one of the things that makes Earth a comfortable place to live.

Explanation:

pls give brainliest

Voting: A Right, A Privilege, or A Responsibility?

When Americans talk about their democracy, they typically emphasize the importance of the right to vote. But the fact is that, unlike other democratic rights protected in the First Amendment, voting rights do not have clear constitutional protections. State legislatures have the right to appoint electors in presidential races without holding elections, for example, and states can enact a variety of policies that directly or indirectly infringe on suffrage rights. While strengthening voting rights in the Constitution would seem like a logical step, there's a potential political barrier: confusion about the meaning of "right."  

This essay invites readers to question whether the ability to vote should be a right, a privilege, or a responsibility. For the ease of readership, I will define the necessary terms:  

At first glance, it's easy to view these terms as mutually exclusive. From their definitions, we can see that what is a "privilege" cannot be a right since rights are enjoyed by everyone, while a privilege is reserved for a select group. Likewise, it's impossible for an individual to take on the burden of responsibility if they lack to the right to vote in the first place.

Despite this initial judgment, many people view the ability to vote as all three simultaneously and weigh "right" after "privilege" or "responsibility." For example, many believe the ability to vote is a privilege granted to today's eligible voters by those who fought for it in the past either through war, grassroots movements, or legislative battles. These struggles have kept the United States as an independent nation and granted us the right to vote with the passage of the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendment, in addition to the legislative victory of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. From this perspective, it is a privilege to live in the United States, standing on the shoulders of these past giants, and we have a responsibility to vote because it honors those who have put their lives on the line to protect it.

Indeed a study conducted in 2006 by Peter D. Hart Research Associates found far most participants in a series of focus groups saw voting as a responsibility or a privilege more than as a right. Many categorized voting primarily as a privilege because previous generations had fought for it and other countries don't enjoy the same freedom. The plurality of participants saw it primarily as a responsibility because it highlights the importance of choosing the government. Many of these participants chose not to classify it primarily as a "right" because the word "right" suggested to them a sense of entitlement.

Many participants also believed that fraud was a bigger problem than disenfranchisement. Although these beliefs are not based in reality (proven cases of voter fraud are miniscule compared to clear cases of denial of suffrage), they say something very important about the general mindset of American voters. When it comes to voting, "right" is a dangerous word since it suggests the ability to vote has simply been given to you without a fight -- and things that can make voting harder but prevent fraud like voter registration laws, requirements for photo identification and inconvenient polling places are minor compared to the sacrifices of past generations. In this mindset, anyone who might not vote due to such barriers is not accepting responsibility for how important it is and not recognizing what a privilege it is to have the right to vote.

As is obvious from the Peter Hart study, a common misconception is the word "right" denoting a sense of entitlement. People who hold this view shy away from considering the ability to vote a right because it suggests it has simply been given to us without historical struggles, thereby demeaning the individuals who have laid their lives on the line to forge and preserve our freedoms.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:100^w

Explanation: