Which of the following is the inverse relation of the set?

Answer:

Hi I'm going to answer the question is 0

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x(-8)(10x+1)=0

Multiply -2 times -8 is 16

16x(10x+1)=0

Use the distributive property to multiply 16x by 10x+1

[tex] {160}^{2} + 16 = 0 \\ [/tex]

Factor out x.

x(160x+16)=0

To find equation solutions, solve x=0 and 160x+16=0

x=0

x=

[tex] - \frac{1}{10} [/tex]

Answer:

700mi cube

Step-by-step explanation:

10x7x10=700mi cube

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

there is no number of 7 or greater.

P(≥7)=0/6=0

Answer:

D. 1/16

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluate: 2^-4

А. =100

В. -8ОО

С. -16

D. 1/16

Given

2^-4

= 1 / 2⁴

= 1 / (2 * 2 * 2 * 2)

= 1 / 16

Therefore,

2^-4 = 1/16

D. 1/16

Using Pythagorean theorem

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto BC^2=AB^2+AC^2[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto BC^2=7^2+3^2[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto BC^2=49+9[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto BC^2=58[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto BC=\sqrt{58}[/tex]

Answer:

+1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

its the negative reciprocal

Answer:

See below & pic.

Step-by-step explanation:

Start by plotting the given point. Then use the slope to find two more points. From the given point go up 2 and right 4. GO back to the given point. Go down 2 and left 4. Now you have 3 points. Connect them with a line.

Answer:

I'm going to say A and B (I think)

answer is 19

the explanation is in the attachment

Answer:

2.7 kilometers

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance per run = 50 meters

Number of run per day = 6

Distance run per day = Distance per run * Number of run per day

= 50 meters * 6

= 300 meters

Last week he ran 4 day

Total distance run last week = Distance run per day * number of days

= 300 meters * 4

= 1200 meters

this week he ran 5 days

Total distance run this week = Distance run per day * number of days

= 300 meters * 5

= 1500 meters

Total distance for two weeks = Total distance run last week + Total distance run this week

= 1200 meters + 1500 meters

= 2700 meters

1000 meters = 1 kilometer

2700 meters = 2700/1000

= 2.7 kilometers

Total distance for two weeks = 2.7 kilometers

The best answer from the choices provide is x = -1 or x = -1

Given the expression

[tex]x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0[/tex]

Factorizing the given expression

[tex](x^2 +x)+(x + 1) = 0\\[/tex]

Factor out the common variable from both brackets

[tex]x(x+1)+1(x+1)=0\\(x+1)(x+1)=0\\x+1 \ and \ x+1=0\\x =0-1 \ and \ x=0-1\\x=-1 \ and \ x =-1[/tex]

Hence the best option is x = -1 or x = -1

Learn more about factorization here: https://brainly.com/question/16099992

The solutions for [tex]f(x) = x^{2}+2\cdot x + 1 = 0[/tex] are [tex]x_{1} = x_{2} = -1[/tex].

We can estimate the roots by a numerical approach, which consists in evaluating the quadratic function ([tex]f(x) = x^{2}+2\cdot x + 1 = 0[/tex]) for a set of values of [tex]x[/tex]. We consider the set of values between [tex]-4\le x \le 4[/tex]:

[tex]\,\,\,\,\,\,x \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,f(x)\\-4\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,9\\-3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,4\\-2\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,1\\-1\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,0\\.\,\,\,0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,1\\.\,\,\,1\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,4\\.\,\,\,2\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,9\\.\,\,\,3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,16\\.\,\,\,4\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,25\\[/tex]

According to the previous input, we conclude that roots of the quadratic formula are [tex]x_{1} = x_{2} = -1[/tex].

The solutions for [tex]f(x) = x^{2}+2\cdot x + 1 = 0[/tex] are [tex]x_{1} = x_{2} = -1[/tex].

Answer:

12,24 etc

Step-by-step explanation:

4 and 6 both go into 12 evenly

4*3 = 12

6*2 = 12

12 is the least common denominator

We could also use 24

4*6 = 24

It is a common denominator, but not the least common denominator

We can use any multiple of 12

Answer:

x = 145, y = 35

Brainliest, please!

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 35 degrees because it and the original 35 degree angle are alternate interior angles. Alternate interior angles are congruent, or the same.

x is supplementary to y. x + y = 180. x + 35 = 180. x = 180 - 35. x = 145

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=y=-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparing these ordered pairs, we will get

4^(1/x)=1/2 and 9^(1/y)=1/3

x=-2 and y=-2

Answer:

x = y = - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the rule of radicals/ exponents

[tex]a^{\frac{m}{n} }[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt[n]{a^{m} }[/tex] , [tex]a^{-m}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{a^{m} }[/tex] , [tex](a^m)^{n}[/tex] = [tex]a^{mn}[/tex]

Given

[tex]\sqrt[x]{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] , then

[tex]\sqrt[x]{2^{2} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]2^{\frac{2}{x} }[/tex] = [tex]2^{-1}[/tex]

Since the bases on both sides are equal, both 2 , then equate exponents

[tex]\frac{2}{x}[/tex] = - 1 ( multiply both sides by x )

2 = - x , that is

x = - 2

Similarly

[tex]\sqrt[y]{9}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] , then

[tex]\sqrt[y]{3^{2} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]3^{\frac{2}{y} }[/tex] = [tex]3^{-1}[/tex]

Equating the exponents gives

[tex]\frac{2}{y}[/tex] = - 1 ⇒ - y = 2 ⇒ y = - 2

Answer:

96m³

Step-by-step explanation:

Base area = 8×6/2 = 24 m²

Height = 12 m

Volume of a pyramid = 1/3 × Base area × Height

= 1/3 × 24 × 12

= 288/3

= 96 m³

Answered by GAUTHMATH

They could complete the job together in 2.4 days

The known parameters are;

The number of days it would take Michelle to complete the landscaping job = 6 days

The number of days it would take Danielle to complete the landscaping job = 4 days

The unknown parameter;

The number of days can the job be completed if they work together

The process of finding the solution;

The rate at which Michelle works = 1/6 of the landscaping work per day

The rate at which Danielle works = 1/4 of the landscaping work per day

Method;

Find their combined work rate, from which the time would take them to complete the job together can be found

Let, C, represent their combined work rate

Therefore, we have;

C = (1/6 + 1/4) = 5/12 of the landscaping (work) job/(per) day

The number of days they could complete the, 1, job = 1 job(work)/(5/12 (work)job/day) = 12/5 days = 2.4 days

∴ The number of days they could complete the job together = 2.4 days.

Learn more about unit rate here;

https://brainly.com/question/19605901

Answer:

its 5/4! haha i used to be good at this when i was in 6th grade:)

Answer:

x ≈ -0.73151

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Find the GCD (or HCF) of numerator and denominator

GCD of 63 and 9 is 9

Divide both the numerator and denominator by the GCD

63 ÷ 9

9 ÷ 9

Reduced fraction:  

7/1

Therefore, 63/9 simplified to lowest terms is 7/1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Brauilo is wrong because he divided by (x+1) instead of (x-1)

Step-by-step explanation:

The remainder Theorem states that

if polynomial f(x) is divided by binomial x-a, the remainder will equal f(a). The factor is positive so the binomial is the same as

which is why we divide by -1, or subsitue -1 into the equation p(x).

The remainder of a polynomial division can be gotten using remainder theorem or synthetic division.

The true statement is: Brauilo did not find the value of a, because he divided by (x+1) instead of (x-1)

From the question, we have the following parameters:

[tex]\mathbf{p(x) = x^4 +5x^3 + ax^2 - 3x + 11}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{Divisor =x+ 1}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{Remainder = 17}[/tex]

First, we set the divisor to 0.

[tex]\mathbf{Divisor =x+ 1 = 0}[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]\mathbf{x+ 1 = 0}[/tex]

Solve for x

[tex]\mathbf{x= -1}[/tex]

The above equation means that, the value of x that will be used to test the polynomial is -1

From the question,

Hence, Braulio is incorrect, because he used the wrong value of x

Read more about polynomial division at:

https://brainly.com/question/12011809

Al plantear un sistema de ecuaciones lineales, encontramos que el número de obreros que contrató el ingeniero civil fue 50.

Para encontrar el número de obreros que el ingeniero contrató debemos plantear un sistema de ecuaciones lineales de dos ecuaciones con dos incógnitas, tal como sigue:

[tex] M - 1400*x = -8000 [/tex]   (1)

[tex] M - 1200*x = 2000 [/tex]   (2)

En donde:

M: es la incógnita igual al monto de dinero del ingeniero

x: es la incógnita igual al número de obreros

De la ecuación (1) tenemos:

[tex] M = 1400*x - 8000 [/tex]   (3)

Podemos encontrar el valor de x (número de obreros), introduciendo la ecuación (3) en la ec (2):

[tex] 1400*x - 8000 - 1200*x = 2000 [/tex]

[tex] 200*x = 10000 [/tex]

[tex] x = 50 [/tex]

El monto de dinero inicial del ingeniero sería entonces (ec 3):

[tex] M = 1400*50 - 8000 = 62000 [/tex]

Por lo tanto, el número de obreros que contrató el ingeniero es 50.

Puedes aprender sobre otro método de resolución de sistemas de ecuaciones lineales ingresando acá: https://brainly.com/question/10831551?referrer=searchResults                                    

Espero que te sea de utilidad!

Answer:

B.5: 5^2(-3)(+7)

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 5 is the HCF of the three numbers, so it goes outside the brackets. 5(^4+4^3−21^2).

2. ^2 is also a factor, so now its 5^2(^2+4-21)

3. Factor by Grouping 5^2(^2−3+7−21)

4. Factor by Grouping 5^2((−3)+7(−3))

5. Factor by Grouping 5^2(−3)(+7)

Thats your final answer.

Answer:

=5×12÷[-12÷{15+(-9)}]

=5×12÷[-12÷6]

=5×12÷(-2)

=-30

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Using exterior angle property, we have 97+4x+7=17x+13. 13x=91, x=7

Step-by-step explanation:

the scanned description is very hard to understand.

so I think what happened :

16x² - 9 = 16

then the first error :

sqrt(16x²) - sqrt(9) = sqrt(16)

that is wrong, as you cannot split a + or - operation inside a sqrt function into + or - separate sqrt results of the parts.

so, correctly, the only possible transformation involving sqrt for both sides :

sqrt(16x² - 9) = sqrt(16)

but it would be even easier to clean up the various constant numbers with each other.

so,

16x² - 9 = 16

16x² = 25

and now we trashes the square root

sqrt(16x²) = sqrt(25)

4x = 5

x = 5/4 or x = -5/4

and I cannot see or understand for my life what the second equation was, as Daniel did something wrong, so I cannot deduct the original equation out of a supposedly wrong

y³ - 1 = 7

Answer:

The vertex is at (2,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

The vertex form of a quadratic is

y = a(x-h)^2 +k  where (h,k) is the vertex

f(x) = 3(x - 2)^2 + 1.

The vertex is at (2,1)

Answer:

B or A

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right on a test a year ago

(is probably B though.)

Cheese required for 1 pizza = ½ pound

So, cheese required for 19 pizzas

= 19 × ½ pounds

= 19/2 pounds

= 9½ pounds

So, Hailey needs 9½ pounds of cheese to make 19 pizzas.

The solution is 9.5 pounds

The number of pounds of cheese Hailey need to make 19 pizzas is 9.5 pounds

What is an Equation?

Equations are mathematical statements with two algebraic expressions flanking the equals (=) sign on either side.

It demonstrates the equality of the relationship between the expressions printed on the left and right sides.

Coefficients, variables, operators, constants, terms, expressions, and the equal to sign are some of the components of an equation. The "=" sign and terms on both sides must always be present when writing an equation.

Given data ,

Let the number of pounds of cheese for 19 pizzas be A

Now , the equation will be

The number of pounds of cheese for 1 pizza = 1/2 pounds

So , the number of pounds of cheese for 19 pizzas = 19 x number of pounds of cheese for 1 pizza

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

The number of pounds of cheese for 19 pizzas = 19 x ( 1/2 )

The number of pounds of cheese for 19 pizzas = 19/2

The number of pounds of cheese for 19 pizzas = 9.5 pounds

Therefore , the value of A is 9.5 pounds

Hence , the number of pounds of cheese is 9.5 pounds

To learn more about equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/19297665

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I would begin by distributing the L. It will be easier in the end to do it this way. There are a couple of ways you can do this, but distribution is the easiest. After you distribute the L you have

T = 2L + LRS

Next subtract the 2L to get

T - 2L = LRS. Lastly, to isolate the R, divide away the LS to get

[tex]\frac{T}{LS}-\frac{2L}{LS}[/tex] = R  In that second term, the L's cancel each other out, leaving us with

[tex]\frac{T}{LS}-\frac{2}{S}[/tex] = R