Answer:
Forensic lab.
Explanation:
The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) unit transport evidence to the forensic laboratory for the testing of evidences. The physical evidence is collected by Crime Scene Investigators that may include fingerprints, footprints, hair, fibers and other materials that are found at the crime scene and on the victim's body. These evidences are used by the forensic scientist in order to find out the cause as well as the criminal.
6969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969669696969696969696969696969
Answer:
what is the question
please mark me as brainlist
thanks
why is the term judicial administration multifaceted
Answer:
Judicial administration
Explanation:
Judicial administration consists of the practices, procedures and offices that deal with the management of the system of the courts. Judicial administration, or administration of the courts, has traditionally been concerned with overseeing budgets, selecting juror pools, assigning judges to cases, creating court calendars of activities, and supervising non-judicial personnel. Court administrators, or clerks of the court, accept the filing of court documents, maintain a file system of cases and a record of all final judgments, and process paperwork generated by judges. Court administrators are also responsible for eliminating racial and gender bias in the courts, ensuring diversity in the court system, and providing easier access to the courts for persons representing themselves without an attorney (pro se or pro per litigants).
Can I helpfull of you
what are the elements of access control
Answer: Identification: For access control to be effective, it must provide some way to identify an individual. ...
Authentication: Identification requires authentication. ...
Authorization: The set of actions allowed to a particular identity makes up the meat of authorization.
Explanation:
một hành vi có thể đồng thời là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hành chính, nhưng không thể đồng thời vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật dân sự
Đúng hay sai
Câu trả lời là có. Nhiều phiên tòa có thể vừa dân sự vừa hình sự. Ví dụ, một người cố ý giết người khác có thể bị buộc tội giết người tại tòa án hình sự và cũng có thể bị kiện dân sự về tội chết oan.
Can it be said that: "Every act that causes damage to the legitimate interests of individuals and organizations in society is a violation of the law"? For example.
No
Explanation:
Depends on what you believe, more or less. In places where freedom of speech is allowed, then no, it's not a crime because you can say whatever you want. However, just because you can do something doesn't make it right. Not a lot of people seem to understand that.
What
are
the objectives of the
Industrial
pollution.
study
Answer:
High spatial resolution emissions
Integrated modelling
Health effects of air pollution
Assessment and quantification of health impacts
Distribution of welfare and challenges for the Nordic welfare systems
How does lack of sleep affect risk of injury?
A. It causes illness.
B. It causes distractions.
C. It interferes with motor responses.
• D. It interferes with hearing.
Ba lần phân công lao động nguyên nhân gián tiếp dẫn đến sự hình thành nhà nước
Answer:
Bắt nạt là một thói quen của một người trong đó họ lợi dụng người khác thông qua thể chất, lời nói, tình cảm, xã hội và thậm chí trong thế giới internet hoặc bắt nạt trên mạng. Điều này thường xảy ra với những người có mong muốn khác và muốn đạt được nó một cách nhanh nhất nên hãy dùng vũ lực để đạt được nó.Một số nguyên nhân gây ra hiện tượng xuất tinh ra máu như sau:Họ muốn thống trị, thống trị và được công nhận trong môi trường mà họ thuộc về vì lợi ích cá nhân.Vì khó chịu, bực bội và cực kỳ tức giận trước tình huống hoặc người đó nên nó dồn nén xung lực lên một người khác mà chúng ta biết sẽ không trả đũa.Ngoài ra một trong những nguyên nhân khiến người khác xuất tinh là vì muốn trả thù cho lần xuất tinh đã xảy ra với mình. Bị kiềm chế và không thể trả đũa người đã làm việc đó, nạn nhân cũng tìm đến những người quen trẻ hơn họ, những người mà họ biết là yếu và họ biết họ sẽ không bị trả thù.Tác động của xuất tinh là gì:Nạn nhân bị bắt nạt thường phải trải qua nỗi buồn và trầm cảm rất lớn. Do sự khác biệt lớn trong hành vi và không có khả năng tự vệ trước những kẻ bắt nạt, hầu hết nạn nhân trở nên trầm cảm và trải qua những thay đổi trong cách họ suy nghĩ, giao tiếp xã hội và tương tác với người khác cũng như đối phó với những người khác.Đối với các học sinh, những trải nghiệm sôi sục thông thường là cảm giác sợ hãi và e ngại, điều này lặp lại những điều đã xảy ra với anh ta. Kết quả là đứa trẻ không muốn đến trường. Họ xa cách với những người làm tổn thương và lạm dụng điểm yếu của họ.Khi không được điều trị, một số nạn nhân đã tự tử vì quá áp lực và xấu hổ.Cách đối phó với những kẻ bắt nạt bạn:Nếu bạn sôi nổi, hãy khoan dung những lời đã nói và hãy kiên nhẫn. Như câu nói, "hãy kéo dài sợi dây của bạn ..." Chúng ta hãy học cách tha thứ và quan tâm đầy đủ đến những điều khác có ý nghĩa hơn.Tránh xa hoặc chạy (nếu cần) đến người đang làm bạn sôi sục anh ta không thành công trong việc muốn gây rối.Nhấn mạnh những nhiệm vụ có ý nghĩa hơn trách nhiệm và chống lại những kẻ bắt nạt.Để biết thêm thông tin về hiện tượng sủi bọt, bạn có thể mở các liên kết bên dưới:Ảnh hưởng của bắt nạt đối với học sinh.Nguyên nhân và ảnh hưởng của việc bắt nạt brainly.ph/question/599432#LearnWithBrainlyExplanation:
#Vietnamese#AnswerForTreesA gardener, a citizen of State A, sues a homeowner, a citizen of State B, in a State A federal court seeking damages for breach of contract. It would not violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution for a State A federal court to hear the case. However, State A's long-arm statute would not grant a State A state court jurisdiction over the homeowner.
Required:
Can the State A federal court exert personal jurisdiction over the homeowner?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
The answer is "No" because, in the given scenario, the Federal Court has little ownership of the property. In line with the Rules of Civil Procedure, that's used to explains the process and how plaintiffs need to exhibit their arguments by a court or decision. In this the States, A lengthy statute needs to be applied, therefore the Federal judges apply the law of the civil procedure law.
Does the Bible say anything about standing up for yourself if you believe that the judicial system is not being fair or right
Answer:
no its says to stand up for those who cant stand up but ethier way if u wanna stand up for that then do it you dont have to follow it we sin but be you
Explanation: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
3. How can it be said that courts adjudicate the allocation of the costs of a consumer-oriented economy?
Answer:
It can be said that the courts assess the consumer profile and consumption pattern in a region, determining which sectors will receive more subsidies to reduce expenses, but increase the production of goods and services, optimizing the regional economy.
Explanation:
A consumer-oriented economy is one that is oriented and driven by consumer spending. Therefore, regions that have this type of economy should study and analyze the consumer profile that citizens have, evaluating the goods and services that are most consumed and that are sustaining this economy more efficiently. Thus, the allocation of expenditures should be determined by the courts in that region, based on the sectors that are most in line with the consumer's profile, being the most profitable sectors and the ones that should be more stimulated.
hội nghị trao đổi thông tin là gì ?
Answer: Trao đổi thông tin hoặc chia sẻ thông tin có nghĩa là mọi người hoặc các thực thể khác truyền thông tin từ người này sang người khác. Điều này có thể được thực hiện bằng điện tử hoặc thông qua các hệ thống nhất định. Đây là những thuật ngữ có thể đề cập đến việc truyền thông tin hai chiều trong viễn thông và khoa học máy tính hoặc truyền thông được nhìn từ quan điểm lý thuyết hệ thống hoặc lý thuyết thông tin. Như, "thông tin", trong ngữ cảnh này luôn đề cập đến dữ liệu (điện tử) mã hóa và đại diện cho thông tin có sẵn, một phương pháp xử lý rộng hơn có thể được tìm thấy trong quá trình trao đổi dữ liệu.
Explanation:
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
how raid is conducted
Answer: yes
it is for the people who suspected of black money or property.
hope its helps you keep smiling be happy stay safe.
Personal property generally does not convey in the sale of real property; however, sometimes the parties to the transaction agree to include some items of personal property in the sale. In an instance like this, the agent?
Answer: should identify in the contract which personal property items are to be included in the sale
Explanation:
Personal property refers to the class of property which has to do with an asset that's not a real estate.
Based on the situation given, in an instance like this, the agent should identify in the contract which personal property items are to be included in the sale.
One of the key tactics of the Civil Rights Movement was the widespread use of civil disobedience. This form of peaceful protest is practiced to this day. When can it be effective? When can it backfire?
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do?
what are the effects of the terms of the contract in a contract of employment
Answer:
One of the most important effects of the terms of the contract in a contract of employment is the obligation as to payment of wages imputed on the employer, which is usually effected in form of remuneration.
Explanation: as said above
The terms of a contract in an employment contract specify the terms of employment and, because they are legally enforceable, protect both parties.
What is an employment contract?
An agreement between an employer and an employee governing the term of employment is known as an employment contract. It may be assumed, expressed orally, or it may be set forth in a formal written agreement that the employee signs.
The conditions outlined in the contract are determined by what was agreed upon at the time the employee indicated they would accept the position.
The effect of terms in an employment contract is that it enables the employees to understand their duties and responsibilities. It also creates an obligation to the employer for payment of salary.
To learn more about contract of employment
https://brainly.com/question/28274545
#SPJ2
do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.
Answer:
Do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.
Explanation:
you are researching the effect of air pollution on human health.you find information from the following sources.which of these would likely be the LEAST biased?
Answer:
Any sources related to industries that cause air pollution such as Oil refineries, cigarette companies, thermal electricity generating firms and the like.
Explanation:
A biased source in a subject usually has some sort of interest in it which is usually financial. This is why we'd expect cigarette companies to lie about the effects of smoking on the lungs.
It is the same thing here. You included no options but the biased source should be one that stands to benefit from misleading the public on the effects of air pollution on health so that people are less enraged and they can continue benefitting from their harmful activities.
In a wrongful death action for the death of his wife in an automobile accident, the plaintiff alleged that the accident was caused by a mudflap assembly that fell off the defendant's truck. The plaintiff wishes to introduce the testimony of a witness, another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, who heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose. The witness does not know the identity of the person who gave the warning. Should the court admit the testimony
Answer: Yes. The court should admit the testimony.
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the court should admit the testimony in order to prove that the defendant was aware about the fact that the mudflap assembly was loose.
This can be infered from the information given from the testimony of
the witness, whom was another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, as he heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose.
Country B has a GDP of $1 trillion and a GDP per capita of $27,000. Its economy is a mix of manufacturing, high tech, services, aviation, agriculture, and mining. It has laws favorable to entrepreneurship and private sector growth. It has multinational corporations that have recently begun outsourcing jobs overseas, resulting in a rise in unemployment. Look for factors that will help you determine what type of economy exists in Country B. Which type of economy does Country B have?
Answer:
The answer is "GDP and GDP per capita are also the increased concentrations of economic growth".
Explanation:
In the developed country, growth and security are high. These are evaluated on a per meter and per person gross national savings, which would represent the whole value of all finished products and services generated for a specific time within a certain nation.
In developing countries, low infant mortality, long average lifespan, improved levels of use, great work as well as the exportation of goods are additional characteristics.
In this situation, you can see that GDP is fairly high and it gives us information that must be acknowledged as just a nation to its advanced economy.
Answer:
A. developed
Explanation:
i got it right on edge
Amanda and Kelly used to be friends after an argument with Amanda Kelly tell everyone at the galley middle school to me at the nearby park after school to watch her fight Amanda everyone at the school met at the park and watch Kelly fight and punched her over and over a student cause the police what do you think the consequences should be for Kelly
Answer:
Is this like a legit question
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
Công ty TNHH Hết hạn có 03 thành viên. Công ty muốn phát hành cổ phần vào tháng 12/2021 để chuyển đổi thành công ty cổ phần. Nhận định nào sau đây đúng? Tất cả đều đúng. "Được vì đây là trường hợp để chuyển thành công ty cổ phần", Bạn học giỏi nhất lớp nói. "Không được vì Công ty TNHH không được phát hành cổ phần trong mọi trường hợp", Chiên gia nói.
Answer:
Tôi khá chắc chắn là "Được rồi.".
Explanation:
how does the criminal justice system deals with vulnerable groups such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex ( LGBTQI) community amongst others when they are victims of hate crimes
Answer:
depending on the country of justice system implementation we are talking about, some countries protect their rights as minorities while others prohibited the prevalence of such groups
Answer:by using the law
Explanation:
Explain, In your own words, why the therapeutic alliance is so important in confronting offenders.
Answer:
A positive therapeutic alliance has many benefits one is it can reduce su-icide attempts among people with Borderline Personality Disorder in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. A confident “early working alliance” can also lead to a reduction in symptoms in chronically depressed patients. Overall this alliance can have a major affect on people.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking for but I hope this helps a bit
(I put a dash because I couldn't post with that word)
You are a prosecutor and are preparing for an upcoming trial. This is a case of arson, and the defendant is accused of setting fire to a barn, causing it to burn to the ground. You have an abundance of physical evidence that points to the defendant, but you also discover that a set of shoeprints found at the scene matches another suspect. This would be an example of what type of evidence?
Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.
What is evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.
In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.
Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
Now that you have listened to the first chapter of Common Sense, what do you think of Paine's philosophy? Particularly, what do think about how he views the government? Do you think he is right or wrong, and why?
